Cargando…

Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation

Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Policies to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brody, Aaron, Sethuraman, Usha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30961654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9
_version_ 1783409603276439552
author Brody, Aaron
Sethuraman, Usha
author_facet Brody, Aaron
Sethuraman, Usha
author_sort Brody, Aaron
collection PubMed
description Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Policies to promote appropriate analgesia in the context of pediatric emergency care have been developed by several professional societies and governmental agencies in the United States; however, progress has been uneven, and data regarding these questions is lacking. In their excellent article, Capua and her co-authors address this precise problem through a unique methodology, by surveying nurse directors of both pediatric accredited and non-accredited emergency departments. Survey questions focused on availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, and on the prevalence with which providers administered both oral and parenteral medications. The results demonstrated widespread availability of evidence based analgesic and anxiolytic treatment, ranging from medical clowns and specific holding positions, to use of intravenous opiates and conscious sedation. No significant differences were found associated with accreditation. These results are surprising and seem to call into question the value of pediatric accreditation. However, an alternative hypothesis would be that accreditation has succeeded, and the results reflect a large spillover effect, in which providers trained in accredited institutions bring these advanced practices to their local departments. Regionalization has been promoted for emergency care of many acute conditions such as trauma, stroke, and myocardial infarction. These results suggest that for pediatric emergencies, at least in regard to analgesia, the answer likely lies in dissemination of knowledge, rather than super specialization. In other words, bring the expertise to the children, not the children to the experts. Further research in this area could focus on optimal ways to achieve such knowledge translation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6454749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64547492019-04-19 Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation Brody, Aaron Sethuraman, Usha Isr J Health Policy Res Commentary Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Policies to promote appropriate analgesia in the context of pediatric emergency care have been developed by several professional societies and governmental agencies in the United States; however, progress has been uneven, and data regarding these questions is lacking. In their excellent article, Capua and her co-authors address this precise problem through a unique methodology, by surveying nurse directors of both pediatric accredited and non-accredited emergency departments. Survey questions focused on availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, and on the prevalence with which providers administered both oral and parenteral medications. The results demonstrated widespread availability of evidence based analgesic and anxiolytic treatment, ranging from medical clowns and specific holding positions, to use of intravenous opiates and conscious sedation. No significant differences were found associated with accreditation. These results are surprising and seem to call into question the value of pediatric accreditation. However, an alternative hypothesis would be that accreditation has succeeded, and the results reflect a large spillover effect, in which providers trained in accredited institutions bring these advanced practices to their local departments. Regionalization has been promoted for emergency care of many acute conditions such as trauma, stroke, and myocardial infarction. These results suggest that for pediatric emergencies, at least in regard to analgesia, the answer likely lies in dissemination of knowledge, rather than super specialization. In other words, bring the expertise to the children, not the children to the experts. Further research in this area could focus on optimal ways to achieve such knowledge translation. BioMed Central 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6454749/ /pubmed/30961654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Brody, Aaron
Sethuraman, Usha
Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_full Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_fullStr Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_short Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_sort optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30961654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brodyaaron optimizingthetreatmentofpainandanxietyinpediatricemergenciestheroleofaccreditation
AT sethuramanusha optimizingthetreatmentofpainandanxietyinpediatricemergenciestheroleofaccreditation