Cargando…

Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of stenting compared with standardized medical treatment in patients with moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS). Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe VAOS and indicated to undergo vertebral artery stenting were enrolled. Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Jia-Xin, Ling, Yun-Ao, Du, Hua-Ping, Zhai, Guo-Jie, Xu, Yuan, Cao, Yong-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6455932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014899
_version_ 1783409685939879936
author Shao, Jia-Xin
Ling, Yun-Ao
Du, Hua-Ping
Zhai, Guo-Jie
Xu, Yuan
Cao, Yong-Jun
author_facet Shao, Jia-Xin
Ling, Yun-Ao
Du, Hua-Ping
Zhai, Guo-Jie
Xu, Yuan
Cao, Yong-Jun
author_sort Shao, Jia-Xin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of stenting compared with standardized medical treatment in patients with moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS). Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe VAOS and indicated to undergo vertebral artery stenting were enrolled. Patients were divided into stenting group and standardized medical treatment group. All patients underwent transcranial Doppler (TCD) before and after treatment. Incidence of new cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack (TIA), improvement of clinical symptoms, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score were observed. A total of 98 patients were enrolled. Vertebral artery stenting implant was accepted by 43 patients. Two weeks after treatment, the NIHSS score in the stenting group decreased significantly compared to that in the standardized medical treatment group. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in the stenting group at three months was significantly lower than that in the medical treatment group (P = .044). The extent of vascular stenosis in the stent group decreased significantly (76.5 ± 10.0% vs. 13.7 ± 5.9%, t = 35.878, P = .000). The adverse events occurred in 9 (16.4%) patients in the medical treatment group and 5 (11.6%) in the stenting group (P = .506). There was one case with new cerebral infarction in the stenting group, whereas the medical treatment group showed 1 case with TIA and three with new cerebral infarction during follow-up after 3 months. The peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI) of stenosis vertebral artery, and PSV of basilar artery were significantly higher in the stent group than those in the standardized medical group (P < .05). Stenting for VAOS, rather than standardized medical treatment, can effectively relieve vascular stenosis, alter vertebral-basilar artery hemodynamics, and improve neurological function, with low perioperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6455932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64559322019-05-29 Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis Shao, Jia-Xin Ling, Yun-Ao Du, Hua-Ping Zhai, Guo-Jie Xu, Yuan Cao, Yong-Jun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of stenting compared with standardized medical treatment in patients with moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS). Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe VAOS and indicated to undergo vertebral artery stenting were enrolled. Patients were divided into stenting group and standardized medical treatment group. All patients underwent transcranial Doppler (TCD) before and after treatment. Incidence of new cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack (TIA), improvement of clinical symptoms, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score were observed. A total of 98 patients were enrolled. Vertebral artery stenting implant was accepted by 43 patients. Two weeks after treatment, the NIHSS score in the stenting group decreased significantly compared to that in the standardized medical treatment group. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in the stenting group at three months was significantly lower than that in the medical treatment group (P = .044). The extent of vascular stenosis in the stent group decreased significantly (76.5 ± 10.0% vs. 13.7 ± 5.9%, t = 35.878, P = .000). The adverse events occurred in 9 (16.4%) patients in the medical treatment group and 5 (11.6%) in the stenting group (P = .506). There was one case with new cerebral infarction in the stenting group, whereas the medical treatment group showed 1 case with TIA and three with new cerebral infarction during follow-up after 3 months. The peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI) of stenosis vertebral artery, and PSV of basilar artery were significantly higher in the stent group than those in the standardized medical group (P < .05). Stenting for VAOS, rather than standardized medical treatment, can effectively relieve vascular stenosis, alter vertebral-basilar artery hemodynamics, and improve neurological function, with low perioperative complications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6455932/ /pubmed/30921187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014899 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Shao, Jia-Xin
Ling, Yun-Ao
Du, Hua-Ping
Zhai, Guo-Jie
Xu, Yuan
Cao, Yong-Jun
Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title_full Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title_fullStr Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title_short Comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
title_sort comparison of hemodynamic changes and prognosis between stenting and standardized medical treatment in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe vertebral artery origin stenosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6455932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014899
work_keys_str_mv AT shaojiaxin comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis
AT lingyunao comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis
AT duhuaping comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis
AT zhaiguojie comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis
AT xuyuan comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis
AT caoyongjun comparisonofhemodynamicchangesandprognosisbetweenstentingandstandardizedmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithsymptomaticmoderatetoseverevertebralarteryoriginstenosis