Cargando…

The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program

Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is known to provide emergency medical services which reduce the number of deaths in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The survival at these patients is affected by the training level of the bystander, but the best format of C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Shou-Chien, Kuo, Chan-Wei, Weng, Yi-Ming, Lin, Chi-Chun, Chen, Jih-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014418
_version_ 1783409692726263808
author Hsu, Shou-Chien
Kuo, Chan-Wei
Weng, Yi-Ming
Lin, Chi-Chun
Chen, Jih-Chang
author_facet Hsu, Shou-Chien
Kuo, Chan-Wei
Weng, Yi-Ming
Lin, Chi-Chun
Chen, Jih-Chang
author_sort Hsu, Shou-Chien
collection PubMed
description Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is known to provide emergency medical services which reduce the number of deaths in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The survival at these patients is affected by the training level of the bystander, but the best format of CPR training is unclear. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine whether the sequence of CPR instruction improves learning retention on the course materials. A total of 95 participants were recruited and divided into 2 groups; Group 1: 49 participants were taught firstly how to recognize a cardiac arrest and activate the emergency response system, and Group 2: 46 participants were taught chest compression first. The performance of participants was observed and evaluated, the results from 1 pre-test and 2 post-tests between 2 groups were then compared. There was a significantly better improvement of participants in Group 2 regarding the recognition of a cardiac arrest and the activation of the emergency response system than of those in Group 1. At the post-test, participants in Group 2 had an improvement in chest compression compared to those in Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant. Our study had revealed that teaching CPR first in a standardized public education program had improved the ability of participants to recognize cardiac arrest and to activate the emergency response system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6456000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64560002019-05-29 The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program Hsu, Shou-Chien Kuo, Chan-Wei Weng, Yi-Ming Lin, Chi-Chun Chen, Jih-Chang Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is known to provide emergency medical services which reduce the number of deaths in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The survival at these patients is affected by the training level of the bystander, but the best format of CPR training is unclear. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine whether the sequence of CPR instruction improves learning retention on the course materials. A total of 95 participants were recruited and divided into 2 groups; Group 1: 49 participants were taught firstly how to recognize a cardiac arrest and activate the emergency response system, and Group 2: 46 participants were taught chest compression first. The performance of participants was observed and evaluated, the results from 1 pre-test and 2 post-tests between 2 groups were then compared. There was a significantly better improvement of participants in Group 2 regarding the recognition of a cardiac arrest and the activation of the emergency response system than of those in Group 1. At the post-test, participants in Group 2 had an improvement in chest compression compared to those in Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant. Our study had revealed that teaching CPR first in a standardized public education program had improved the ability of participants to recognize cardiac arrest and to activate the emergency response system. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6456000/ /pubmed/30921176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014418 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsu, Shou-Chien
Kuo, Chan-Wei
Weng, Yi-Ming
Lin, Chi-Chun
Chen, Jih-Chang
The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title_full The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title_fullStr The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title_short The effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
title_sort effectiveness of teaching chest compression first in a standardized public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014418
work_keys_str_mv AT hsushouchien theeffectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT kuochanwei theeffectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT wengyiming theeffectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT linchichun theeffectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT chenjihchang theeffectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT hsushouchien effectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT kuochanwei effectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT wengyiming effectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT linchichun effectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram
AT chenjihchang effectivenessofteachingchestcompressionfirstinastandardizedpubliccardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingprogram