Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in the treatment of burns and to provide evidence-based medical information for clinicians to choose the appropriate treatment measures for burns. METHODS: Seven databases, including PubMed, the C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30946374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015102 |
_version_ | 1783409710751285248 |
---|---|
author | Zhan, Da-Chuan Shen, Yong-Shuai Zhao, Yue-Rong Meng, Fan-Jun |
author_facet | Zhan, Da-Chuan Shen, Yong-Shuai Zhao, Yue-Rong Meng, Fan-Jun |
author_sort | Zhan, Da-Chuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in the treatment of burns and to provide evidence-based medical information for clinicians to choose the appropriate treatment measures for burns. METHODS: Seven databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Wanfang Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Internet, and the Chongqing Chongqing Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VIP), were searched by computer. Randomized controlled trials on bFGF in the treatment of burns were collected, and the search was conducted by using a combination of subject terms (MeSH) and free words. The search time limit was from the establishment of each database until January 2019. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. According to the evaluation criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.3.0, they conducted a rigorous bias risk assessment for the included studies, and Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: System evaluation and meta-analysis were carried out strictly in accordance with the requirements of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.3.0 on meta-analysis and provided a high-quality evaluation of the efficacy and safety of bFGF in the treatment of burns. CONCLUSION: This study provided conclusions from evidence-based medicine and a scientific basis for the efficacy and safety of bFGF in the clinical treatment of burns. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was not a clinical trial and therefore did not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in an SCI academic journal related to this study in the form of a public publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124778. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6456122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64561222019-05-29 Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zhan, Da-Chuan Shen, Yong-Shuai Zhao, Yue-Rong Meng, Fan-Jun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in the treatment of burns and to provide evidence-based medical information for clinicians to choose the appropriate treatment measures for burns. METHODS: Seven databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Wanfang Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Internet, and the Chongqing Chongqing Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VIP), were searched by computer. Randomized controlled trials on bFGF in the treatment of burns were collected, and the search was conducted by using a combination of subject terms (MeSH) and free words. The search time limit was from the establishment of each database until January 2019. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. According to the evaluation criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.3.0, they conducted a rigorous bias risk assessment for the included studies, and Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: System evaluation and meta-analysis were carried out strictly in accordance with the requirements of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.3.0 on meta-analysis and provided a high-quality evaluation of the efficacy and safety of bFGF in the treatment of burns. CONCLUSION: This study provided conclusions from evidence-based medicine and a scientific basis for the efficacy and safety of bFGF in the clinical treatment of burns. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was not a clinical trial and therefore did not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in an SCI academic journal related to this study in the form of a public publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124778. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6456122/ /pubmed/30946374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015102 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhan, Da-Chuan Shen, Yong-Shuai Zhao, Yue-Rong Meng, Fan-Jun Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of basic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of burns: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30946374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhandachuan efficacyandsafetyofbasicfibroblastgrowthfactorinthetreatmentofburnsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shenyongshuai efficacyandsafetyofbasicfibroblastgrowthfactorinthetreatmentofburnsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhaoyuerong efficacyandsafetyofbasicfibroblastgrowthfactorinthetreatmentofburnsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mengfanjun efficacyandsafetyofbasicfibroblastgrowthfactorinthetreatmentofburnsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |