Cargando…
Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across ten centers
PURPOSE: As massively parallel sequencing is increasingly being used for clinical decision-making, it has become critical to understand parameters that affect sequencing quality and to establish methods for measuring and reporting clinical sequencing standards. In this report, we propose a definitio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.192 |
_version_ | 1783409742024015872 |
---|---|
author | Sanghvi, Rashesh V. Buhay, Christian J. Powell, Bradford C. Tsai, Ellen A. Dorschner, Michael O. Hong, Celine S. Lebo, Matthew S. Sasson, Ariella Hanna, David S. McGee, Sean Bowling, Kevin M. Cooper, Gregory M. Gray, David E. Lonigro, Robert J. Dunford, Andrew Brennan, Christine A. Cibulskis, Carrie Walker, Kimberly Carneiro, Mauricio O. Sailsbery, Joshua Hindorff, Lucia A. Robinson, Dan R. Santani, Avni Sarmady, Mahdi Rehm, Heidi L. Biesecker, Leslie G. Nickerson, Deborah A. Hutter, Carolyn M. Garraway, Levi Muzny, Donna M. Wagle, Nikhil |
author_facet | Sanghvi, Rashesh V. Buhay, Christian J. Powell, Bradford C. Tsai, Ellen A. Dorschner, Michael O. Hong, Celine S. Lebo, Matthew S. Sasson, Ariella Hanna, David S. McGee, Sean Bowling, Kevin M. Cooper, Gregory M. Gray, David E. Lonigro, Robert J. Dunford, Andrew Brennan, Christine A. Cibulskis, Carrie Walker, Kimberly Carneiro, Mauricio O. Sailsbery, Joshua Hindorff, Lucia A. Robinson, Dan R. Santani, Avni Sarmady, Mahdi Rehm, Heidi L. Biesecker, Leslie G. Nickerson, Deborah A. Hutter, Carolyn M. Garraway, Levi Muzny, Donna M. Wagle, Nikhil |
author_sort | Sanghvi, Rashesh V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: As massively parallel sequencing is increasingly being used for clinical decision-making, it has become critical to understand parameters that affect sequencing quality and to establish methods for measuring and reporting clinical sequencing standards. In this report, we propose a definition for reduced coverage regions and have established a set of standards for variant calling in clinical sequencing applications. METHODS: To enable sequencing centers to assess the regions of poor sequencing quality in their own data, we optimized and used a tool (ExCid) to identify reduced coverage loci within genes or regions of particular interest. We used this framework to examine sequencing data from 500 patients generated in ten projects from sequencing centers in the NHGRI/NCI Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. RESULTS: This approach identified reduced coverage regions in clinically relevant genes, including known clinically relevant loci that were uniquely missed at individual centers, in multiple centers, and in all centers. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides a process roadmap for clinical sequencing centers looking to perform similar analyses on their data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6456263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64562632019-04-10 Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across ten centers Sanghvi, Rashesh V. Buhay, Christian J. Powell, Bradford C. Tsai, Ellen A. Dorschner, Michael O. Hong, Celine S. Lebo, Matthew S. Sasson, Ariella Hanna, David S. McGee, Sean Bowling, Kevin M. Cooper, Gregory M. Gray, David E. Lonigro, Robert J. Dunford, Andrew Brennan, Christine A. Cibulskis, Carrie Walker, Kimberly Carneiro, Mauricio O. Sailsbery, Joshua Hindorff, Lucia A. Robinson, Dan R. Santani, Avni Sarmady, Mahdi Rehm, Heidi L. Biesecker, Leslie G. Nickerson, Deborah A. Hutter, Carolyn M. Garraway, Levi Muzny, Donna M. Wagle, Nikhil Genet Med Article PURPOSE: As massively parallel sequencing is increasingly being used for clinical decision-making, it has become critical to understand parameters that affect sequencing quality and to establish methods for measuring and reporting clinical sequencing standards. In this report, we propose a definition for reduced coverage regions and have established a set of standards for variant calling in clinical sequencing applications. METHODS: To enable sequencing centers to assess the regions of poor sequencing quality in their own data, we optimized and used a tool (ExCid) to identify reduced coverage loci within genes or regions of particular interest. We used this framework to examine sequencing data from 500 patients generated in ten projects from sequencing centers in the NHGRI/NCI Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium. RESULTS: This approach identified reduced coverage regions in clinically relevant genes, including known clinically relevant loci that were uniquely missed at individual centers, in multiple centers, and in all centers. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides a process roadmap for clinical sequencing centers looking to perform similar analyses on their data. 2017-11-16 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6456263/ /pubmed/29144510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.192 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Sanghvi, Rashesh V. Buhay, Christian J. Powell, Bradford C. Tsai, Ellen A. Dorschner, Michael O. Hong, Celine S. Lebo, Matthew S. Sasson, Ariella Hanna, David S. McGee, Sean Bowling, Kevin M. Cooper, Gregory M. Gray, David E. Lonigro, Robert J. Dunford, Andrew Brennan, Christine A. Cibulskis, Carrie Walker, Kimberly Carneiro, Mauricio O. Sailsbery, Joshua Hindorff, Lucia A. Robinson, Dan R. Santani, Avni Sarmady, Mahdi Rehm, Heidi L. Biesecker, Leslie G. Nickerson, Deborah A. Hutter, Carolyn M. Garraway, Levi Muzny, Donna M. Wagle, Nikhil Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title | Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title_full | Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title_fullStr | Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title_short | Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
title_sort | characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome
and genome sequencing data across ten centers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanghvirasheshv characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT buhaychristianj characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT powellbradfordc characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT tsaiellena characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT dorschnermichaelo characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT hongcelines characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT lebomatthews characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT sassonariella characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT hannadavids characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT mcgeesean characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT bowlingkevinm characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT coopergregorym characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT graydavide characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT lonigrorobertj characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT dunfordandrew characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT brennanchristinea characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT cibulskiscarrie characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT walkerkimberly characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT carneiromauricioo characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT sailsberyjoshua characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT hindorffluciaa characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT robinsondanr characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT santaniavni characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT sarmadymahdi characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT rehmheidil characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT bieseckerleslieg characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT nickersondeboraha characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT huttercarolynm characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT garrawaylevi characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT muznydonnam characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters AT waglenikhil characterizingreducedcoverageregionsthroughcomparisonofexomeandgenomesequencingdataacrosstencenters |