Cargando…
Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The process of growing leads to inter-individual differences in the timing of growth, maturational, and developmental processes during childhood and adolescence, also affecting balance performance in youth. However, differences in balance performance by age and sex in youth have not been...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30964877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214434 |
_version_ | 1783409744089710592 |
---|---|
author | Schedler, Simon Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas |
author_facet | Schedler, Simon Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas |
author_sort | Schedler, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The process of growing leads to inter-individual differences in the timing of growth, maturational, and developmental processes during childhood and adolescence, also affecting balance performance in youth. However, differences in balance performance by age and sex in youth have not been systematically investigated yet. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to characterize and quantify age- and sex-related differences in balance performance in healthy youth. METHODS: A computerized systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus. To be applicable for analysis, studies had to report at least one measure of static steady-state, dynamic steady-state, proactive or reactive balance in healthy children (6–12 years) and/or adolescents (13–18 years). Coding of the studies was done according to the following criteria: age, sex, and balance outcome. Study quality was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Weighted standardized mean differences were calculated and classified according to their magnitude. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies examined age-related differences in balance performance. A large effect for measures of static steady-state balance (SMD(ba) = 1.20) and small effects for proxies of dynamic steady-state (SMD(ba) = 0.26) and proactive balance (SMD(ba) = 0.28) were found; all in favor of adolescents. Twenty-five studies investigated sex-related differences in balance performance. A small-sized effect was observed for static steady-state balance (SMD(bs) = 0.33) in favor of girls and for dynamic steady-state (SMD(bs) -0.02) and proactive balance (SMD(bs) = -0.15) in favor of boys. Due to a lack of studies, no analysis for measures of reactive balance was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed better balance performances in adolescents compared to children, irrespective of the measure considered. Sex-related differences were inconsistent. These findings may have implications for example in terms of trainability of balance in youth that should be investigated in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6456289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64562892019-05-03 Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis Schedler, Simon Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The process of growing leads to inter-individual differences in the timing of growth, maturational, and developmental processes during childhood and adolescence, also affecting balance performance in youth. However, differences in balance performance by age and sex in youth have not been systematically investigated yet. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to characterize and quantify age- and sex-related differences in balance performance in healthy youth. METHODS: A computerized systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus. To be applicable for analysis, studies had to report at least one measure of static steady-state, dynamic steady-state, proactive or reactive balance in healthy children (6–12 years) and/or adolescents (13–18 years). Coding of the studies was done according to the following criteria: age, sex, and balance outcome. Study quality was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Weighted standardized mean differences were calculated and classified according to their magnitude. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies examined age-related differences in balance performance. A large effect for measures of static steady-state balance (SMD(ba) = 1.20) and small effects for proxies of dynamic steady-state (SMD(ba) = 0.26) and proactive balance (SMD(ba) = 0.28) were found; all in favor of adolescents. Twenty-five studies investigated sex-related differences in balance performance. A small-sized effect was observed for static steady-state balance (SMD(bs) = 0.33) in favor of girls and for dynamic steady-state (SMD(bs) -0.02) and proactive balance (SMD(bs) = -0.15) in favor of boys. Due to a lack of studies, no analysis for measures of reactive balance was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed better balance performances in adolescents compared to children, irrespective of the measure considered. Sex-related differences were inconsistent. These findings may have implications for example in terms of trainability of balance in youth that should be investigated in future studies. Public Library of Science 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6456289/ /pubmed/30964877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214434 Text en © 2019 Schedler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schedler, Simon Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | age and sex differences in human balance performance from 6-18 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30964877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schedlersimon ageandsexdifferencesinhumanbalanceperformancefrom618yearsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kissrainer ageandsexdifferencesinhumanbalanceperformancefrom618yearsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muehlbauerthomas ageandsexdifferencesinhumanbalanceperformancefrom618yearsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |