Cargando…

Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia

OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, X.-M., Sun, R.-X., Huang, W.-H., Yu, J.-P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3
_version_ 1783409756867657728
author Jiang, X.-M.
Sun, R.-X.
Huang, W.-H.
Yu, J.-P.
author_facet Jiang, X.-M.
Sun, R.-X.
Huang, W.-H.
Yu, J.-P.
author_sort Jiang, X.-M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lower abdominal midline incision for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia. METHODS: Data of 47 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated or strangulated femoral hernias from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical incisions, they were divided into two groups: the observation group (21 cases) had a lower abdominal midline incision, and the control group (26 cases) had a traditional inguinal incision. General data of patients, intraoperative findings, operative time and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable.15 cases (31.9%) underwent intestinal resection, and 32 cases (68.1%) underwent first-stage tension-free repair in total. The rate of first-stage tension-free hernioplasty was significantly higher in the observation group (18/21, 85.7% vs 14/26 53.8%, P = 0.020). No additional incision was required in the observation group, while six cases of the control group (23.1%) had an additional incision for intestinal resection and anastomosis (P = 0.026). Mean operative time (53.6 ± 24.7 min vs 77.9 ± 36.5 min, P = 0.012) and the length of hospital stay (6.3 ± 4.2 days vs 10.3 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.020) were significantly shorter in the observation group. The time of return to normal physical activity resulted significantly reduced compared to the control group (9.2 ± 4.1 days vs 13.3 ± 6.6 days, P = 0.017). The total incidence of postoperative complication (including chronic pain, foreign body sensation, hernia recurrence, wound infection and seroma/hematomas) in the observation group was lower (14.3% vs 42.3% P = 0.037). There were two recurrences in the control group. No mesh-related infection and no mortalities in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Midline preperitoneal approach for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia is a convenient and effective technique. It can improve the rate of first-stage tension-free repair of incarcerated femoral hernia and allow intestinal resection through the same incision, and with lower rate of postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6456472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64564722019-04-26 Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia Jiang, X.-M. Sun, R.-X. Huang, W.-H. Yu, J.-P. Hernia Original Article OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lower abdominal midline incision for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia. METHODS: Data of 47 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated or strangulated femoral hernias from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical incisions, they were divided into two groups: the observation group (21 cases) had a lower abdominal midline incision, and the control group (26 cases) had a traditional inguinal incision. General data of patients, intraoperative findings, operative time and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable.15 cases (31.9%) underwent intestinal resection, and 32 cases (68.1%) underwent first-stage tension-free repair in total. The rate of first-stage tension-free hernioplasty was significantly higher in the observation group (18/21, 85.7% vs 14/26 53.8%, P = 0.020). No additional incision was required in the observation group, while six cases of the control group (23.1%) had an additional incision for intestinal resection and anastomosis (P = 0.026). Mean operative time (53.6 ± 24.7 min vs 77.9 ± 36.5 min, P = 0.012) and the length of hospital stay (6.3 ± 4.2 days vs 10.3 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.020) were significantly shorter in the observation group. The time of return to normal physical activity resulted significantly reduced compared to the control group (9.2 ± 4.1 days vs 13.3 ± 6.6 days, P = 0.017). The total incidence of postoperative complication (including chronic pain, foreign body sensation, hernia recurrence, wound infection and seroma/hematomas) in the observation group was lower (14.3% vs 42.3% P = 0.037). There were two recurrences in the control group. No mesh-related infection and no mortalities in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Midline preperitoneal approach for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia is a convenient and effective technique. It can improve the rate of first-stage tension-free repair of incarcerated femoral hernia and allow intestinal resection through the same incision, and with lower rate of postoperative complications. Springer Paris 2018-11-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6456472/ /pubmed/30448913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jiang, X.-M.
Sun, R.-X.
Huang, W.-H.
Yu, J.-P.
Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title_full Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title_fullStr Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title_full_unstemmed Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title_short Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
title_sort midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangxm midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia
AT sunrx midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia
AT huangwh midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia
AT yujp midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia