Cargando…
Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia
OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3 |
_version_ | 1783409756867657728 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, X.-M. Sun, R.-X. Huang, W.-H. Yu, J.-P. |
author_facet | Jiang, X.-M. Sun, R.-X. Huang, W.-H. Yu, J.-P. |
author_sort | Jiang, X.-M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lower abdominal midline incision for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia. METHODS: Data of 47 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated or strangulated femoral hernias from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical incisions, they were divided into two groups: the observation group (21 cases) had a lower abdominal midline incision, and the control group (26 cases) had a traditional inguinal incision. General data of patients, intraoperative findings, operative time and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable.15 cases (31.9%) underwent intestinal resection, and 32 cases (68.1%) underwent first-stage tension-free repair in total. The rate of first-stage tension-free hernioplasty was significantly higher in the observation group (18/21, 85.7% vs 14/26 53.8%, P = 0.020). No additional incision was required in the observation group, while six cases of the control group (23.1%) had an additional incision for intestinal resection and anastomosis (P = 0.026). Mean operative time (53.6 ± 24.7 min vs 77.9 ± 36.5 min, P = 0.012) and the length of hospital stay (6.3 ± 4.2 days vs 10.3 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.020) were significantly shorter in the observation group. The time of return to normal physical activity resulted significantly reduced compared to the control group (9.2 ± 4.1 days vs 13.3 ± 6.6 days, P = 0.017). The total incidence of postoperative complication (including chronic pain, foreign body sensation, hernia recurrence, wound infection and seroma/hematomas) in the observation group was lower (14.3% vs 42.3% P = 0.037). There were two recurrences in the control group. No mesh-related infection and no mortalities in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Midline preperitoneal approach for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia is a convenient and effective technique. It can improve the rate of first-stage tension-free repair of incarcerated femoral hernia and allow intestinal resection through the same incision, and with lower rate of postoperative complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6456472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64564722019-04-26 Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia Jiang, X.-M. Sun, R.-X. Huang, W.-H. Yu, J.-P. Hernia Original Article OBJECTIVE: Femoral hernias constantly present as incarceration or strangulation and require emergency surgery. Incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia repair remains challenging and controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of preperitoneal tension-free hernioplasty via lower abdominal midline incision for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia. METHODS: Data of 47 patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated or strangulated femoral hernias from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical incisions, they were divided into two groups: the observation group (21 cases) had a lower abdominal midline incision, and the control group (26 cases) had a traditional inguinal incision. General data of patients, intraoperative findings, operative time and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable.15 cases (31.9%) underwent intestinal resection, and 32 cases (68.1%) underwent first-stage tension-free repair in total. The rate of first-stage tension-free hernioplasty was significantly higher in the observation group (18/21, 85.7% vs 14/26 53.8%, P = 0.020). No additional incision was required in the observation group, while six cases of the control group (23.1%) had an additional incision for intestinal resection and anastomosis (P = 0.026). Mean operative time (53.6 ± 24.7 min vs 77.9 ± 36.5 min, P = 0.012) and the length of hospital stay (6.3 ± 4.2 days vs 10.3 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.020) were significantly shorter in the observation group. The time of return to normal physical activity resulted significantly reduced compared to the control group (9.2 ± 4.1 days vs 13.3 ± 6.6 days, P = 0.017). The total incidence of postoperative complication (including chronic pain, foreign body sensation, hernia recurrence, wound infection and seroma/hematomas) in the observation group was lower (14.3% vs 42.3% P = 0.037). There were two recurrences in the control group. No mesh-related infection and no mortalities in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Midline preperitoneal approach for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia is a convenient and effective technique. It can improve the rate of first-stage tension-free repair of incarcerated femoral hernia and allow intestinal resection through the same incision, and with lower rate of postoperative complications. Springer Paris 2018-11-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6456472/ /pubmed/30448913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jiang, X.-M. Sun, R.-X. Huang, W.-H. Yu, J.-P. Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title | Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title_full | Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title_fullStr | Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title_full_unstemmed | Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title_short | Midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
title_sort | midline preperitoneal repair for incarcerated and strangulated femoral hernia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1848-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangxm midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia AT sunrx midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia AT huangwh midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia AT yujp midlinepreperitonealrepairforincarceratedandstrangulatedfemoralhernia |