Cargando…

Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Background: Despite the increasing use of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in patients with epilepsy, little is known about its brain regional distribution pattern, including diaschisis, and its correspondence with FDG-PET. Here, we investigated the regional match and mismatch between FDG-PET and ASL in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sone, Daichi, Maikusa, Norihide, Sato, Noriko, Kimura, Yukio, Ota, Miho, Matsuda, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00318
_version_ 1783409780236222464
author Sone, Daichi
Maikusa, Norihide
Sato, Noriko
Kimura, Yukio
Ota, Miho
Matsuda, Hiroshi
author_facet Sone, Daichi
Maikusa, Norihide
Sato, Noriko
Kimura, Yukio
Ota, Miho
Matsuda, Hiroshi
author_sort Sone, Daichi
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite the increasing use of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in patients with epilepsy, little is known about its brain regional distribution pattern, including diaschisis, and its correspondence with FDG-PET. Here, we investigated the regional match and mismatch between FDG-PET and ASL in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: We recruited 27 patients with unilateral TLE, who underwent inter-ictal ASL and FDG-PET scans. These images were spatially normalized using Statistical Parametric Mapping 12, and the regional values in both ASL and FDG-PET were calculated using PMOD software within 20 volumes of interest (VOIs), including the temporal lobe, adjacent cortices, subcortical structures, and cerebellum. ASL images of 37 healthy controls were also analyzed and compared. Results: Whereas, ASL showed significant side differences, mainly in the temporal and frontal lobes, the significant abnormalities in FDG-PET were more widespread and included the insula and supramarginal gyrus. Ipsilateral thalamic reduction was found in FDG-PET only. The detectability of the focus side compared with the contralateral side was generally higher in FDG-PET. The discriminative values in ASL compared with healthy controls were higher in temporal neocortex and amygdala VOIs. Conclusions: There are similar and differing regional distributions between FDG-PET and ASL in TLE, possibly reflecting regional match and mismatch of cerebral blood flow and metabolism. At this stage, it seems that ASL couldn't present comparable clinical usefulness with FDG-PET. These findings deepen our knowledge of ASL imaging and are potentially useful for its further application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6456651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64566512019-04-18 Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Sone, Daichi Maikusa, Norihide Sato, Noriko Kimura, Yukio Ota, Miho Matsuda, Hiroshi Front Neurol Neurology Background: Despite the increasing use of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in patients with epilepsy, little is known about its brain regional distribution pattern, including diaschisis, and its correspondence with FDG-PET. Here, we investigated the regional match and mismatch between FDG-PET and ASL in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: We recruited 27 patients with unilateral TLE, who underwent inter-ictal ASL and FDG-PET scans. These images were spatially normalized using Statistical Parametric Mapping 12, and the regional values in both ASL and FDG-PET were calculated using PMOD software within 20 volumes of interest (VOIs), including the temporal lobe, adjacent cortices, subcortical structures, and cerebellum. ASL images of 37 healthy controls were also analyzed and compared. Results: Whereas, ASL showed significant side differences, mainly in the temporal and frontal lobes, the significant abnormalities in FDG-PET were more widespread and included the insula and supramarginal gyrus. Ipsilateral thalamic reduction was found in FDG-PET only. The detectability of the focus side compared with the contralateral side was generally higher in FDG-PET. The discriminative values in ASL compared with healthy controls were higher in temporal neocortex and amygdala VOIs. Conclusions: There are similar and differing regional distributions between FDG-PET and ASL in TLE, possibly reflecting regional match and mismatch of cerebral blood flow and metabolism. At this stage, it seems that ASL couldn't present comparable clinical usefulness with FDG-PET. These findings deepen our knowledge of ASL imaging and are potentially useful for its further application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6456651/ /pubmed/31001198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00318 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sone, Maikusa, Sato, Kimura, Ota and Matsuda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Sone, Daichi
Maikusa, Norihide
Sato, Noriko
Kimura, Yukio
Ota, Miho
Matsuda, Hiroshi
Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title_full Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title_fullStr Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title_short Similar and Differing Distributions Between (18)F-FDG-PET and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
title_sort similar and differing distributions between (18)f-fdg-pet and arterial spin labeling imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00318
work_keys_str_mv AT sonedaichi similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy
AT maikusanorihide similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy
AT satonoriko similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy
AT kimurayukio similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy
AT otamiho similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy
AT matsudahiroshi similaranddifferingdistributionsbetween18ffdgpetandarterialspinlabelingimagingintemporallobeepilepsy