Cargando…

Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe muscle function deficit in patients after stroke as well as to define the relationship between maximal muscle power (P(max)) and optimal shortening velocity (υ(opt)) with functional efficiency in stroke survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 134...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kostka, Joanna, Niwald, Marta, Guligowska, Agnieszka, Kostka, Tomasz, Miller, Elżbieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1243
_version_ 1783409806351007744
author Kostka, Joanna
Niwald, Marta
Guligowska, Agnieszka
Kostka, Tomasz
Miller, Elżbieta
author_facet Kostka, Joanna
Niwald, Marta
Guligowska, Agnieszka
Kostka, Tomasz
Miller, Elżbieta
author_sort Kostka, Joanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe muscle function deficit in patients after stroke as well as to define the relationship between maximal muscle power (P(max)) and optimal shortening velocity (υ(opt)) with functional efficiency in stroke survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 134 participants were enrolled in the study, including 67 patients after a stroke and 67 volunteers, matched for age and sex (controls). Functional performance was measured with the timed Up and Go test (TUG) and additionally with Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) and Barthel Index (BI) in stroke survivors. To assess P(max) and υ(opt) of the knee extensor muscles, a specially equipped Monark cycle ergometer was used. RESULTS: The power generated by stroke survivors was 49.6% that of their peers and muscle contraction velocity was 65.5%. P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were associated with TUG outcomes in both groups. P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were associated with age in the control group, but not in patients after stroke. In multivariate analysis in patients after stroke, TUG was better predicted by P(max)/kg or υ(opt) than by the age. In stroke survivors, both P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were related to the BI and to the RMA total results. Both BI and RMA total were not determined by age. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle power and muscle contraction velocity in patients who have had a stroke within three months have reduced markedly. These factors significantly affect functional performance. Muscle power and optimal shortening velocity are more important determinants of functional status than age in these stroke survivors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6456770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64567702019-04-19 Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke Kostka, Joanna Niwald, Marta Guligowska, Agnieszka Kostka, Tomasz Miller, Elżbieta Brain Behav Original Research OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe muscle function deficit in patients after stroke as well as to define the relationship between maximal muscle power (P(max)) and optimal shortening velocity (υ(opt)) with functional efficiency in stroke survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 134 participants were enrolled in the study, including 67 patients after a stroke and 67 volunteers, matched for age and sex (controls). Functional performance was measured with the timed Up and Go test (TUG) and additionally with Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) and Barthel Index (BI) in stroke survivors. To assess P(max) and υ(opt) of the knee extensor muscles, a specially equipped Monark cycle ergometer was used. RESULTS: The power generated by stroke survivors was 49.6% that of their peers and muscle contraction velocity was 65.5%. P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were associated with TUG outcomes in both groups. P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were associated with age in the control group, but not in patients after stroke. In multivariate analysis in patients after stroke, TUG was better predicted by P(max)/kg or υ(opt) than by the age. In stroke survivors, both P(max)/kg and υ(opt) were related to the BI and to the RMA total results. Both BI and RMA total were not determined by age. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle power and muscle contraction velocity in patients who have had a stroke within three months have reduced markedly. These factors significantly affect functional performance. Muscle power and optimal shortening velocity are more important determinants of functional status than age in these stroke survivors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6456770/ /pubmed/30821102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1243 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kostka, Joanna
Niwald, Marta
Guligowska, Agnieszka
Kostka, Tomasz
Miller, Elżbieta
Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title_full Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title_fullStr Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title_short Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
title_sort muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1243
work_keys_str_mv AT kostkajoanna musclepowercontractionvelocityandfunctionalperformanceafterstroke
AT niwaldmarta musclepowercontractionvelocityandfunctionalperformanceafterstroke
AT guligowskaagnieszka musclepowercontractionvelocityandfunctionalperformanceafterstroke
AT kostkatomasz musclepowercontractionvelocityandfunctionalperformanceafterstroke
AT millerelzbieta musclepowercontractionvelocityandfunctionalperformanceafterstroke