Cargando…

Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies related to assessing functional connectivity (FC) in resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging have revealed that the resulting connectivity patterns exhibit considerable fluctuations (dynamic FC [dFC]). A widely applied method for quantifying dFC is the slidin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savva, Antonis D., Mitsis, Georgios D., Matsopoulos, George K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1255
_version_ 1783409809645633536
author Savva, Antonis D.
Mitsis, Georgios D.
Matsopoulos, George K.
author_facet Savva, Antonis D.
Mitsis, Georgios D.
Matsopoulos, George K.
author_sort Savva, Antonis D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent studies related to assessing functional connectivity (FC) in resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging have revealed that the resulting connectivity patterns exhibit considerable fluctuations (dynamic FC [dFC]). A widely applied method for quantifying dFC is the sliding window technique. According to this method, the data are divided into segments with the same length (window size) and a correlation metric is employed to assess the connectivity within these segments, whereby the window size is often empirically chosen. METHODS: In this study, we rigorously investigate the assessment of dFC using the sliding window approach. Specifically, we perform a detailed comparison between different correlation metrics, including Pearson, Spearman and Kendall correlation, Pearson and Spearman partial correlation, Mutual Information (MI), Variation of Information (VI), Kullback–Leibler divergence, Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives and Inverse Covariance. RESULTS: Using test–retest datasets, we show that MI and VI yielded the most consistent results by achieving high reliability with respect to dFC estimates for different window sizes. Subsequent hypothesis testing, based on multivariate phase randomization surrogate data generation, allowed the identification of dynamic connections between the posterior cingulate cortex and regions in the frontal lobe and inferior parietal lobes, which were overall in agreement with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of MI and VI, a window size of at least 120 s was found to be necessary for detecting dFC for some of the previously identified dynamically connected regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6456784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64567842019-04-19 Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique Savva, Antonis D. Mitsis, Georgios D. Matsopoulos, George K. Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Recent studies related to assessing functional connectivity (FC) in resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging have revealed that the resulting connectivity patterns exhibit considerable fluctuations (dynamic FC [dFC]). A widely applied method for quantifying dFC is the sliding window technique. According to this method, the data are divided into segments with the same length (window size) and a correlation metric is employed to assess the connectivity within these segments, whereby the window size is often empirically chosen. METHODS: In this study, we rigorously investigate the assessment of dFC using the sliding window approach. Specifically, we perform a detailed comparison between different correlation metrics, including Pearson, Spearman and Kendall correlation, Pearson and Spearman partial correlation, Mutual Information (MI), Variation of Information (VI), Kullback–Leibler divergence, Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives and Inverse Covariance. RESULTS: Using test–retest datasets, we show that MI and VI yielded the most consistent results by achieving high reliability with respect to dFC estimates for different window sizes. Subsequent hypothesis testing, based on multivariate phase randomization surrogate data generation, allowed the identification of dynamic connections between the posterior cingulate cortex and regions in the frontal lobe and inferior parietal lobes, which were overall in agreement with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of MI and VI, a window size of at least 120 s was found to be necessary for detecting dFC for some of the previously identified dynamically connected regions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6456784/ /pubmed/30884215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1255 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Savva, Antonis D.
Mitsis, Georgios D.
Matsopoulos, George K.
Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title_full Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title_fullStr Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title_short Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI using the sliding window technique
title_sort assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fmri using the sliding window technique
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1255
work_keys_str_mv AT savvaantonisd assessmentofdynamicfunctionalconnectivityinrestingstatefmriusingtheslidingwindowtechnique
AT mitsisgeorgiosd assessmentofdynamicfunctionalconnectivityinrestingstatefmriusingtheslidingwindowtechnique
AT matsopoulosgeorgek assessmentofdynamicfunctionalconnectivityinrestingstatefmriusingtheslidingwindowtechnique