Cargando…

An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?

PURPOSE: Postoperative knee flexion protocol has been widely recognized as a highly attractive, simple, and cost-effective tactic to improve patient’s outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, optimal knee position and duration of knee flexion are still controversial. The purpos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hai-yang, Yu, Guang-shu, Li, Jie-hui, Zhang, Shou-xiong, Lin, Yan-bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1140-y
_version_ 1783409849299632128
author Wang, Hai-yang
Yu, Guang-shu
Li, Jie-hui
Zhang, Shou-xiong
Lin, Yan-bin
author_facet Wang, Hai-yang
Yu, Guang-shu
Li, Jie-hui
Zhang, Shou-xiong
Lin, Yan-bin
author_sort Wang, Hai-yang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Postoperative knee flexion protocol has been widely recognized as a highly attractive, simple, and cost-effective tactic to improve patient’s outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, optimal knee position and duration of knee flexion are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of different postoperative knee flexion protocols, as an aid to find out optimal limb management strategy following TKA. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the available and relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with regard to the influence of different postoperative knee positions on clinical outcomes after primary TKA in electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Med Online, and VIP, up to May 2018. In this meta-analysis, three major subgroups based on diverse postoperative knee flexion protocols were considered: long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), short term (< 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), and long-term (≥ 24 h) mild flexion (≤ 30°). The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials were finally included in this meta-analysis. The result of subgroup analysis indicated that keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P < 0.00001), hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001), and transfusion requirements (P = 0.003) and led to a significant improvement in range of motion (ROM) at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001); keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a short time (< 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.006) and hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001) but not significantly improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P = 0.34) and reduced transfusion requirements (P = 0.62); and keeping the knee in mild flexion (≤ 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.02) and transfusion requirements (P = 0.02) and improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001) but not significantly reduced hidden blood loss (P = 0.11). Furthermore, there was no significant difference with respect to the rates of wound-related infection and DVT between the three knee flexion subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that the long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°) protocol could be an optimal limb management to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements and facilitate early postoperative rehabilitation exercises in patients after primary TKA without increasing in complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6457036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64570362019-04-19 An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method? Wang, Hai-yang Yu, Guang-shu Li, Jie-hui Zhang, Shou-xiong Lin, Yan-bin J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review PURPOSE: Postoperative knee flexion protocol has been widely recognized as a highly attractive, simple, and cost-effective tactic to improve patient’s outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, optimal knee position and duration of knee flexion are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of different postoperative knee flexion protocols, as an aid to find out optimal limb management strategy following TKA. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the available and relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with regard to the influence of different postoperative knee positions on clinical outcomes after primary TKA in electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Med Online, and VIP, up to May 2018. In this meta-analysis, three major subgroups based on diverse postoperative knee flexion protocols were considered: long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), short term (< 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), and long-term (≥ 24 h) mild flexion (≤ 30°). The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials were finally included in this meta-analysis. The result of subgroup analysis indicated that keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P < 0.00001), hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001), and transfusion requirements (P = 0.003) and led to a significant improvement in range of motion (ROM) at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001); keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a short time (< 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.006) and hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001) but not significantly improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P = 0.34) and reduced transfusion requirements (P = 0.62); and keeping the knee in mild flexion (≤ 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.02) and transfusion requirements (P = 0.02) and improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001) but not significantly reduced hidden blood loss (P = 0.11). Furthermore, there was no significant difference with respect to the rates of wound-related infection and DVT between the three knee flexion subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that the long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°) protocol could be an optimal limb management to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements and facilitate early postoperative rehabilitation exercises in patients after primary TKA without increasing in complication rate. BioMed Central 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6457036/ /pubmed/30971262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1140-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Hai-yang
Yu, Guang-shu
Li, Jie-hui
Zhang, Shou-xiong
Lin, Yan-bin
An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title_full An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title_fullStr An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title_full_unstemmed An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title_short An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
title_sort updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty—what is the optimal method?
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1140-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghaiyang anupdatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT yuguangshu anupdatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT lijiehui anupdatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT zhangshouxiong anupdatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT linyanbin anupdatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT wanghaiyang updatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT yuguangshu updatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT lijiehui updatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT zhangshouxiong updatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod
AT linyanbin updatedmetaanalysisevaluatinglimbmanagementaftertotalkneearthroplastywhatistheoptimalmethod