Cargando…

Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures for mental health services need to adopt a service-user recovery focus. AIMS: To develop and validate a 10- and 20-item self-report recovery-focused quality of life outcome measure named Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL). METHOD: Qualitative methods for item development...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keetharuth, Anju Devianee, Brazier, John, Connell, Janice, Bjorner, Jakob Bue, Carlton, Jill, Taylor Buck, Elizabeth, Ricketts, Thomas, McKendrick, Kirsty, Browne, John, Croudace, Tim, Barkham, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2017.10
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Outcome measures for mental health services need to adopt a service-user recovery focus. AIMS: To develop and validate a 10- and 20-item self-report recovery-focused quality of life outcome measure named Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL). METHOD: Qualitative methods for item development and initial testing, and quantitative methods for item reduction and scale construction were used. Data from >6500 service users were factor analysed and item response theory models employed to inform item selection. The measures were tested for reliability, validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 contain positively and negatively worded items covering seven themes: activity, hope, belonging and relationships, self-perception, well-being, autonomy, and physical health. Both versions achieved acceptable internal consistency, test–retest reliability (>0.85), known-group differences, convergence with related measures, and were responsive over time (standardised response mean (SRM) > 0.4). They performed marginally better than the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and markedly better than the EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: Both versions are appropriate for measuring service-user recovery-focused quality of life outcomes. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: M.B. and J.Co. were members of the research group that developed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) outcome measures.