Cargando…

The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease with severe complications and without approved therapies. Currently, there is limited data on the overall burden of the disease for patients or on patient needs and preferences. This study investigates patient preferences in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Nigel, Geier, Andreas, Schmid, Andreas, Hirschfield, Gideon, Kautz, Achim, Schattenberg, Jörn M., Balp, Maria-Magdalena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00061
_version_ 1783409873048829952
author Cook, Nigel
Geier, Andreas
Schmid, Andreas
Hirschfield, Gideon
Kautz, Achim
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
author_facet Cook, Nigel
Geier, Andreas
Schmid, Andreas
Hirschfield, Gideon
Kautz, Achim
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
author_sort Cook, Nigel
collection PubMed
description Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease with severe complications and without approved therapies. Currently, there is limited data on the overall burden of the disease for patients or on patient needs and preferences. This study investigates patient preferences in relation to potential future therapies for NASH. In addition, the factors that are relevant to patients and their importance in relation to future treatment options are explored. Method: Telephone in-depth interviews (TDIs) preceded an online 30-min quantitative survey. The online survey included (1) multiple choice questions (MCQs) on NASH diagnosis and disease background. (2) An exercise to determine patients' satisfaction levels with information provided at diagnosis, and to explore symptomatology in detail. (3) Exercises to evaluate potential new products and product attributes, including a “drag and drop” ranking exercise, and an adaptive choice-based conjoint exercise (ACBC). (4) The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which measures patients' health status. (5) Collection of socio-demographic data, and (6) Questions to measure patient satisfaction with the survey. Results: There were 166 patients included in this study from Canada [n = 36], Germany [n = 50], the UK [n = 30], and USA [n = 50]. Fifty seven percent of patients [n = 94] had had a liver biopsy for confirmation of NASH. Patients were often unable to link their symptoms to NASH or other conditions. ACBC results showed that efficacy, defined as “impact on liver status” was the single most important attribute of a potential future NASH therapy. Other attributes considered to have secondary importance included impact on weight, symptom control and the presence of side effects. The EQ-5D utility score was 0.81 and VAS = 67.2. Conclusion: “Impact on liver status” is the primary outcome sought. Patients demonstrate a general lack of understanding of their disease and appeared to be unfamiliar with longer-term consequences of NASH. It is necessary to improve patient understanding of NASH and its progressive nature, and there is a need for improving confirmatory diagnosis and monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6457207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64572072019-05-17 The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs Cook, Nigel Geier, Andreas Schmid, Andreas Hirschfield, Gideon Kautz, Achim Schattenberg, Jörn M. Balp, Maria-Magdalena Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease with severe complications and without approved therapies. Currently, there is limited data on the overall burden of the disease for patients or on patient needs and preferences. This study investigates patient preferences in relation to potential future therapies for NASH. In addition, the factors that are relevant to patients and their importance in relation to future treatment options are explored. Method: Telephone in-depth interviews (TDIs) preceded an online 30-min quantitative survey. The online survey included (1) multiple choice questions (MCQs) on NASH diagnosis and disease background. (2) An exercise to determine patients' satisfaction levels with information provided at diagnosis, and to explore symptomatology in detail. (3) Exercises to evaluate potential new products and product attributes, including a “drag and drop” ranking exercise, and an adaptive choice-based conjoint exercise (ACBC). (4) The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which measures patients' health status. (5) Collection of socio-demographic data, and (6) Questions to measure patient satisfaction with the survey. Results: There were 166 patients included in this study from Canada [n = 36], Germany [n = 50], the UK [n = 30], and USA [n = 50]. Fifty seven percent of patients [n = 94] had had a liver biopsy for confirmation of NASH. Patients were often unable to link their symptoms to NASH or other conditions. ACBC results showed that efficacy, defined as “impact on liver status” was the single most important attribute of a potential future NASH therapy. Other attributes considered to have secondary importance included impact on weight, symptom control and the presence of side effects. The EQ-5D utility score was 0.81 and VAS = 67.2. Conclusion: “Impact on liver status” is the primary outcome sought. Patients demonstrate a general lack of understanding of their disease and appeared to be unfamiliar with longer-term consequences of NASH. It is necessary to improve patient understanding of NASH and its progressive nature, and there is a need for improving confirmatory diagnosis and monitoring. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6457207/ /pubmed/31106203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00061 Text en Copyright © 2019 Cook, Geier, Schmid, Hirschfield, Kautz, Schattenberg and Balp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Cook, Nigel
Geier, Andreas
Schmid, Andreas
Hirschfield, Gideon
Kautz, Achim
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Balp, Maria-Magdalena
The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title_full The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title_fullStr The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title_full_unstemmed The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title_short The Patient Perspectives on Future Therapeutic Options in NASH and Patient Needs
title_sort patient perspectives on future therapeutic options in nash and patient needs
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00061
work_keys_str_mv AT cooknigel thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT geierandreas thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT schmidandreas thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT hirschfieldgideon thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT kautzachim thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT schattenbergjornm thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT balpmariamagdalena thepatientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT cooknigel patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT geierandreas patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT schmidandreas patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT hirschfieldgideon patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT kautzachim patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT schattenbergjornm patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds
AT balpmariamagdalena patientperspectivesonfuturetherapeuticoptionsinnashandpatientneeds