Cargando…

Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games

The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men’s singles; 108 sets in women’s singles; 77 sets in men’s d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres-Luque, Gema, Fernández-García, Ángel Iván, Blanca-Torres, Juan Carlos, Kondric, Miran, Cabello-Manrique, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731
_version_ 1783409874238963712
author Torres-Luque, Gema
Fernández-García, Ángel Iván
Blanca-Torres, Juan Carlos
Kondric, Miran
Cabello-Manrique, David
author_facet Torres-Luque, Gema
Fernández-García, Ángel Iván
Blanca-Torres, Juan Carlos
Kondric, Miran
Cabello-Manrique, David
author_sort Torres-Luque, Gema
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men’s singles; 108 sets in women’s singles; 77 sets in men’s doubles; 73 in women’s doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann–Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men’s and women’s singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women’s singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men’s doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) (p < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women’s doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6457257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64572572019-04-18 Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games Torres-Luque, Gema Fernández-García, Ángel Iván Blanca-Torres, Juan Carlos Kondric, Miran Cabello-Manrique, David Front Psychol Psychology The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men’s singles; 108 sets in women’s singles; 77 sets in men’s doubles; 73 in women’s doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann–Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men’s and women’s singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women’s singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men’s doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) (p < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women’s doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6457257/ /pubmed/31001177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731 Text en Copyright © 2019 Torres-Luque, Fernández-García, Blanca-Torres, Kondric and Cabello-Manrique. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Torres-Luque, Gema
Fernández-García, Ángel Iván
Blanca-Torres, Juan Carlos
Kondric, Miran
Cabello-Manrique, David
Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title_full Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title_fullStr Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title_full_unstemmed Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title_short Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games
title_sort statistical differences in set analysis in badminton at the rio 2016 olympic games
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731
work_keys_str_mv AT torresluquegema statisticaldifferencesinsetanalysisinbadmintonattherio2016olympicgames
AT fernandezgarciaangelivan statisticaldifferencesinsetanalysisinbadmintonattherio2016olympicgames
AT blancatorresjuancarlos statisticaldifferencesinsetanalysisinbadmintonattherio2016olympicgames
AT kondricmiran statisticaldifferencesinsetanalysisinbadmintonattherio2016olympicgames
AT cabellomanriquedavid statisticaldifferencesinsetanalysisinbadmintonattherio2016olympicgames