Cargando…

Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

INTRODUCTION: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. To date, no studies have assessed the role of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the status and maturation of the repaired ligament. The goal of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der List, Jelle P., Mintz, Douglas N., DiFelice, Gregory S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5940195
_version_ 1783409883885862912
author van der List, Jelle P.
Mintz, Douglas N.
DiFelice, Gregory S.
author_facet van der List, Jelle P.
Mintz, Douglas N.
DiFelice, Gregory S.
author_sort van der List, Jelle P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. To date, no studies have assessed the role of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the status and maturation of the repaired ligament. The goal of this study was therefore to assess (I) the accuracy of MRI on rerupture of the repaired ligament and (II) the maturation of the repaired ACL. METHODS: All postoperative MRIs of patients that underwent arthroscopic primary ACL repair were included. A musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded for MRI indication, surgery-MRI time interval, and clinical stability, retrospectively assessed the ligament continuity and graded ligament maturation as hypointense (similar to intact PCL), isointense (>50% similar to PCL), or hyperintense (<50% similar to PCL). RESULTS: Thirty-seven MRIs were included from 36 patients. Mean age was 30 years (range: 14–57 years), and mean surgery-MRI interval was 1.5 years (range: 0.1–4.9 years). The radiologist recognized 6 out of 8 reruptures and 26 out of 29 intact ligaments (sensitivity 75%, specificity 90%, and accuracy 86%). Ligaments in the first year were more often hyperintense than after one year (60% vs. 11%, p=0.02), most often isointense (60%) between one and two years, and more often hypointense after two years than before two years (56% vs. 10%, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Postoperative MRI was found to accurately predict the rerupture of the primarily repaired ACL. Furthermore, it can be expected that the repaired ligament is hyperintense within the first year, while the signal becomes similar to the intact PCL after two years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6457311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64573112019-04-28 Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair van der List, Jelle P. Mintz, Douglas N. DiFelice, Gregory S. Adv Orthop Research Article INTRODUCTION: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. To date, no studies have assessed the role of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the status and maturation of the repaired ligament. The goal of this study was therefore to assess (I) the accuracy of MRI on rerupture of the repaired ligament and (II) the maturation of the repaired ACL. METHODS: All postoperative MRIs of patients that underwent arthroscopic primary ACL repair were included. A musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded for MRI indication, surgery-MRI time interval, and clinical stability, retrospectively assessed the ligament continuity and graded ligament maturation as hypointense (similar to intact PCL), isointense (>50% similar to PCL), or hyperintense (<50% similar to PCL). RESULTS: Thirty-seven MRIs were included from 36 patients. Mean age was 30 years (range: 14–57 years), and mean surgery-MRI interval was 1.5 years (range: 0.1–4.9 years). The radiologist recognized 6 out of 8 reruptures and 26 out of 29 intact ligaments (sensitivity 75%, specificity 90%, and accuracy 86%). Ligaments in the first year were more often hyperintense than after one year (60% vs. 11%, p=0.02), most often isointense (60%) between one and two years, and more often hypointense after two years than before two years (56% vs. 10%, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Postoperative MRI was found to accurately predict the rerupture of the primarily repaired ACL. Furthermore, it can be expected that the repaired ligament is hyperintense within the first year, while the signal becomes similar to the intact PCL after two years. Hindawi 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6457311/ /pubmed/31032121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5940195 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jelle P. van der List et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der List, Jelle P.
Mintz, Douglas N.
DiFelice, Gregory S.
Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title_full Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title_fullStr Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title_short Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
title_sort postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5940195
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlistjellep postoperativemagneticresonanceimagingfollowingarthroscopicprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepair
AT mintzdouglasn postoperativemagneticresonanceimagingfollowingarthroscopicprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepair
AT difelicegregorys postoperativemagneticresonanceimagingfollowingarthroscopicprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepair