Cargando…

Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that ablation of low‐voltage areas (LVAs) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves the success rate in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) patients with LVAs. However, the need for LVA ablation in addition to the posterior left atrial isolation, Box isol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumagai, Koichiro, Toyama, Hideko, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12169
_version_ 1783409891739697152
author Kumagai, Koichiro
Toyama, Hideko
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Kumagai, Koichiro
Toyama, Hideko
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Kumagai, Koichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that ablation of low‐voltage areas (LVAs) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves the success rate in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) patients with LVAs. However, the need for LVA ablation in addition to the posterior left atrial isolation, Box isolation (BOXI), for PerAF is unclear. We evaluated the effects of LVA ablation after BOXI for PerAF with LVAs. METHODS: In 115 patients with PerAF (75 longstanding PerAF), LA voltage maps were created during sinus rhythm after PVI. Subsequently, BOXI was performed. In 61 patients without LVAs (<0.5 mV), BOXI alone was performed. Fifty‐four patients with LVAs were randomly assigned to BOXI plus LVA ablation (33 patients) or BOXI alone (21 patients). RESULTS: The rate of AF termination or cardioversion after BOXI was significantly higher than that after PVI (100% vs 88%, P < 0.001). The inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia after BOXI was significantly lower than that after PVI (27% vs 100%, P < 0.001). During 24 ± 9 months of follow‐up after a single procedure, atrial tachyarrhythmia‐free rate in the patients with LVAs, was significantly lower than that without LVAs (65% vs 82%, P = 0.043). However, the success rate was not significantly different between the BOXI plus LVA ablation group and the BOXI alone group of patients with LVAs (67% vs 62%, P = 0.722). CONCLUSION: BOXI facilitates AF termination and its non‐inducibility. Among patients with PerAF, BOXI alone may be adequate in cases without LVAs. Although cases with LVAs have higher risk of AF recurrence, additional LVA ablation does not improve the outcomes much.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6457373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64573732019-04-19 Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation Kumagai, Koichiro Toyama, Hideko Zhang, Bo J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that ablation of low‐voltage areas (LVAs) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves the success rate in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) patients with LVAs. However, the need for LVA ablation in addition to the posterior left atrial isolation, Box isolation (BOXI), for PerAF is unclear. We evaluated the effects of LVA ablation after BOXI for PerAF with LVAs. METHODS: In 115 patients with PerAF (75 longstanding PerAF), LA voltage maps were created during sinus rhythm after PVI. Subsequently, BOXI was performed. In 61 patients without LVAs (<0.5 mV), BOXI alone was performed. Fifty‐four patients with LVAs were randomly assigned to BOXI plus LVA ablation (33 patients) or BOXI alone (21 patients). RESULTS: The rate of AF termination or cardioversion after BOXI was significantly higher than that after PVI (100% vs 88%, P < 0.001). The inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia after BOXI was significantly lower than that after PVI (27% vs 100%, P < 0.001). During 24 ± 9 months of follow‐up after a single procedure, atrial tachyarrhythmia‐free rate in the patients with LVAs, was significantly lower than that without LVAs (65% vs 82%, P = 0.043). However, the success rate was not significantly different between the BOXI plus LVA ablation group and the BOXI alone group of patients with LVAs (67% vs 62%, P = 0.722). CONCLUSION: BOXI facilitates AF termination and its non‐inducibility. Among patients with PerAF, BOXI alone may be adequate in cases without LVAs. Although cases with LVAs have higher risk of AF recurrence, additional LVA ablation does not improve the outcomes much. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6457373/ /pubmed/31007783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12169 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kumagai, Koichiro
Toyama, Hideko
Zhang, Bo
Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title_full Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title_short Effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after Box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
title_sort effects of additional ablation of low‐voltage areas after box isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12169
work_keys_str_mv AT kumagaikoichiro effectsofadditionalablationoflowvoltageareasafterboxisolationforpersistentatrialfibrillation
AT toyamahideko effectsofadditionalablationoflowvoltageareasafterboxisolationforpersistentatrialfibrillation
AT zhangbo effectsofadditionalablationoflowvoltageareasafterboxisolationforpersistentatrialfibrillation