Cargando…

No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly

The perceived distance between two touches has been found to be larger for pairs of stimuli oriented across the width of the body than along the length of the body, for several body parts. Nevertheless, the magnitude of such biases varies from place to place, suggesting systematically different dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longo, Matthew R., Lulciuc, Anamaria, Sotakova, Lenka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180866
_version_ 1783410005447278592
author Longo, Matthew R.
Lulciuc, Anamaria
Sotakova, Lenka
author_facet Longo, Matthew R.
Lulciuc, Anamaria
Sotakova, Lenka
author_sort Longo, Matthew R.
collection PubMed
description The perceived distance between two touches has been found to be larger for pairs of stimuli oriented across the width of the body than along the length of the body, for several body parts. Nevertheless, the magnitude of such biases varies from place to place, suggesting systematically different distortions of tactile space across the body. Several recent studies have investigated perceived tactile distance on the belly as an implicit measure of body perception in clinical conditions including anorexia nervosa and obesity. In this study, we investigated whether there is an anisotropy of perceived tactile distance on the belly in a sample of adult women. Participants made verbal estimates of the perceived distance between pairs of touches oriented either across body width or along body length on the belly and the dorsum of the left hand. Consistent with previous results, a large anisotropy was apparent on the hand, with across stimuli perceived as larger than along stimuli. In contrast, no such bias was apparent on the belly. These results provide further evidence that anisotropies of perceived tactile distance vary systematically across the body and suggest that there is no anisotropy at all on the belly in healthy women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64584292019-04-26 No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly Longo, Matthew R. Lulciuc, Anamaria Sotakova, Lenka R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience The perceived distance between two touches has been found to be larger for pairs of stimuli oriented across the width of the body than along the length of the body, for several body parts. Nevertheless, the magnitude of such biases varies from place to place, suggesting systematically different distortions of tactile space across the body. Several recent studies have investigated perceived tactile distance on the belly as an implicit measure of body perception in clinical conditions including anorexia nervosa and obesity. In this study, we investigated whether there is an anisotropy of perceived tactile distance on the belly in a sample of adult women. Participants made verbal estimates of the perceived distance between pairs of touches oriented either across body width or along body length on the belly and the dorsum of the left hand. Consistent with previous results, a large anisotropy was apparent on the hand, with across stimuli perceived as larger than along stimuli. In contrast, no such bias was apparent on the belly. These results provide further evidence that anisotropies of perceived tactile distance vary systematically across the body and suggest that there is no anisotropy at all on the belly in healthy women. The Royal Society 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6458429/ /pubmed/31031988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180866 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Longo, Matthew R.
Lulciuc, Anamaria
Sotakova, Lenka
No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title_full No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title_fullStr No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title_full_unstemmed No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title_short No evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
title_sort no evidence of tactile distance anisotropy on the belly
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180866
work_keys_str_mv AT longomatthewr noevidenceoftactiledistanceanisotropyonthebelly
AT lulciucanamaria noevidenceoftactiledistanceanisotropyonthebelly
AT sotakovalenka noevidenceoftactiledistanceanisotropyonthebelly