Cargando…

Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study

OBJECTIVES: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. The lack of an accepted definition of what constitutes a high-quality stabilisation of a traumatically injured child has limited the evaluation of direct interventions in simulation-based education and service-delivery models to improve t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKinnon, Ralph James, Pukk-Härenstam, Karin, Von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, Kennedy, Christopher, Stenfors, Terese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z
_version_ 1783410044503588864
author MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Kennedy, Christopher
Stenfors, Terese
author_facet MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Kennedy, Christopher
Stenfors, Terese
author_sort MacKinnon, Ralph James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. The lack of an accepted definition of what constitutes a high-quality stabilisation of a traumatically injured child has limited the evaluation of direct interventions in simulation-based education and service-delivery models to improve trauma care. The aim of this study was to create a framework that delineates quality by exploring the perceptions of the multi-disciplinary team providing and improving this initial care. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 36 experienced UK trauma team members and governance administrators (clinical directors to executive board level), from three standard UK trauma units. This study used a phenomenographic approach to explore the relationships and hierarchy between the contrasting perceptions of quality and evaluation of quality in this acute context. RESULTS: The findings show that defining quality is a more complex concept than simple proxy measurements, such as time to CT scanning. They also show that the concept of quality requires the consideration of a spectrum of perspectives that range from the simple to the more sophisticated. This study highlights the importance of teamwork, individualised perspectives and the culture of care provision, when describing quality. A novel framework to delineate quality is presented, comprising System, Team, Process, Individual, Data and Culture. CONCLUSIONS: This study has created a framework of understanding of acute paediatric trauma care quality and its measurement from the perspectives of team members and administrators. A framework and future tools to capture and disseminate the System, Team, Process, Individual, Data and Culture perspectives of the quality of trauma stabilisations could be a key advance in the care of severely injured children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64586222019-04-19 Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Kennedy, Christopher Stenfors, Terese Adv Simul (Lond) Research OBJECTIVES: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. The lack of an accepted definition of what constitutes a high-quality stabilisation of a traumatically injured child has limited the evaluation of direct interventions in simulation-based education and service-delivery models to improve trauma care. The aim of this study was to create a framework that delineates quality by exploring the perceptions of the multi-disciplinary team providing and improving this initial care. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 36 experienced UK trauma team members and governance administrators (clinical directors to executive board level), from three standard UK trauma units. This study used a phenomenographic approach to explore the relationships and hierarchy between the contrasting perceptions of quality and evaluation of quality in this acute context. RESULTS: The findings show that defining quality is a more complex concept than simple proxy measurements, such as time to CT scanning. They also show that the concept of quality requires the consideration of a spectrum of perspectives that range from the simple to the more sophisticated. This study highlights the importance of teamwork, individualised perspectives and the culture of care provision, when describing quality. A novel framework to delineate quality is presented, comprising System, Team, Process, Individual, Data and Culture. CONCLUSIONS: This study has created a framework of understanding of acute paediatric trauma care quality and its measurement from the perspectives of team members and administrators. A framework and future tools to capture and disseminate the System, Team, Process, Individual, Data and Culture perspectives of the quality of trauma stabilisations could be a key advance in the care of severely injured children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458622/ /pubmed/31007949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Kennedy, Christopher
Stenfors, Terese
Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title_full Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title_fullStr Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title_full_unstemmed Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title_short Defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
title_sort defining and measuring quality in acute paediatric trauma stabilisation: a phenomenographic study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0091-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mackinnonralphjames definingandmeasuringqualityinacutepaediatrictraumastabilisationaphenomenographicstudy
AT pukkharenstamkarin definingandmeasuringqualityinacutepaediatrictraumastabilisationaphenomenographicstudy
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica definingandmeasuringqualityinacutepaediatrictraumastabilisationaphenomenographicstudy
AT kennedychristopher definingandmeasuringqualityinacutepaediatrictraumastabilisationaphenomenographicstudy
AT stenforsterese definingandmeasuringqualityinacutepaediatrictraumastabilisationaphenomenographicstudy