Cargando…

Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial

INTRODUCTION: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a prognostic and nonspecific biomarker associated with short-term mortality in emergency department (ED) patients. Therefore, the blood level of suPAR might be usable for identification of patients at high- and low risk, short...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schultz, Martin, Rasmussen, Line J. H., Kallemose, Thomas, Kjøller, Erik, Lind, Morten N., Ravn, Lisbet, Lange, Theis, Køber, Lars, Rasmussen, Lars S., Eugen-Olsen, Jesper, Iversen, Kasper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0621-7
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a prognostic and nonspecific biomarker associated with short-term mortality in emergency department (ED) patients. Therefore, the blood level of suPAR might be usable for identification of patients at high- and low risk, shortly after arrival at the ED. Here, we investigate the value of adding suPAR to triage and how this may impact on risk stratification regarding mortality. METHODS: The analyses were performed on the TRIAGE III cohort. Patients were triaged in four groups: Red, Orange, Yellow, and Green. Outcome was all-cause mortality within seven days. Discriminative abilities of triage and suPAR on mortality were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. A suPAR cut-off value was generated using the Youden’s index. Patients were subsequently reclassified one triage level up if the suPAR level was above this cut-off and one level down if the suPAR level was below that value. RESULTS: The study included 4420 patients with an available triage category and suPAR measurement. suPAR was significantly better in predicting mortality than triage; AUC (95% confidence interval): 0.85 (0.80–0.89) vs. 0.71 (0.64–0.78), P < 0.001. Combining suPAR and triage yielded an AUC of 0.87 (0.82–0-93). The Youden’s cut-off of suPAR was 5.9 ng/mL and reclassified triage using this value resulted in a more accurate risk stratification regarding hospital admission and mortality. CONCLUSION: Addition of suPAR to triage potentially improves prediction of short-term mortality. Measurement of suPAR in relation to the triage process may allow a more accurate identification of ED patients at risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02643459. Registered 31 December 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02643459?cond=NCT02643459&rank=1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-019-0621-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.