Cargando…

The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening

BACKGROUND: This study was an evaluation of the role of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the detection of trisomy 7 in prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 35 consecutive cases underwent screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing between April 2015 and November 2017 due to suspicious N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Yiming, Yang, Jiexia, Hou, Yaping, Guo, Fangfang, Peng, Haishan, Wang, Dongmei, Du, Qianyi, Yin, Aihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-019-0201-y
_version_ 1783410065544314880
author Qi, Yiming
Yang, Jiexia
Hou, Yaping
Guo, Fangfang
Peng, Haishan
Wang, Dongmei
Du, Qianyi
Yin, Aihua
author_facet Qi, Yiming
Yang, Jiexia
Hou, Yaping
Guo, Fangfang
Peng, Haishan
Wang, Dongmei
Du, Qianyi
Yin, Aihua
author_sort Qi, Yiming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was an evaluation of the role of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the detection of trisomy 7 in prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 35 consecutive cases underwent screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing between April 2015 and November 2017 due to suspicious NIPT results; these cases represented 0.11% of patients (35/31,250) with similar frequencies of abnormal results among the laboratories performing the tests. NIPT was offered to further screen for common fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used to detect 20, 14, and 25 patients, respectively, who accepted confirmatory diagnostic testing. RESULTS: High-risk results by NIPT were recorded for trisomy 7 alone in 29 women: dual aneuploidy in 4 patients and multiple aneuploidy in 2 patients. Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells was normal in all 20 pregnancies, suggesting a probability of confined placental mosaicism. Further CMA data were obtained in 14 of the cases mentioned above, and 2 fetuses were detected with positive results with copy number variation. The NGS results suggested that all these samples were placental chimerisms of chromosome 7, except for one sample that was found to be an additional chimerism of chromosome 2, which was also consistent with the NIPT result. CONCLUSION: Our results may be useful for the counseling of pregnant women in the detection of trisomy 7 by NIPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64587122019-04-19 The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening Qi, Yiming Yang, Jiexia Hou, Yaping Guo, Fangfang Peng, Haishan Wang, Dongmei Du, Qianyi Yin, Aihua Hum Genomics Primary Research BACKGROUND: This study was an evaluation of the role of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the detection of trisomy 7 in prenatal diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 35 consecutive cases underwent screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing between April 2015 and November 2017 due to suspicious NIPT results; these cases represented 0.11% of patients (35/31,250) with similar frequencies of abnormal results among the laboratories performing the tests. NIPT was offered to further screen for common fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used to detect 20, 14, and 25 patients, respectively, who accepted confirmatory diagnostic testing. RESULTS: High-risk results by NIPT were recorded for trisomy 7 alone in 29 women: dual aneuploidy in 4 patients and multiple aneuploidy in 2 patients. Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells was normal in all 20 pregnancies, suggesting a probability of confined placental mosaicism. Further CMA data were obtained in 14 of the cases mentioned above, and 2 fetuses were detected with positive results with copy number variation. The NGS results suggested that all these samples were placental chimerisms of chromosome 7, except for one sample that was found to be an additional chimerism of chromosome 2, which was also consistent with the NIPT result. CONCLUSION: Our results may be useful for the counseling of pregnant women in the detection of trisomy 7 by NIPT. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458712/ /pubmed/30971315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-019-0201-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Primary Research
Qi, Yiming
Yang, Jiexia
Hou, Yaping
Guo, Fangfang
Peng, Haishan
Wang, Dongmei
Du, Qianyi
Yin, Aihua
The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title_full The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title_fullStr The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title_full_unstemmed The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title_short The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
title_sort significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40246-019-0201-y
work_keys_str_mv AT qiyiming thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT yangjiexia thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT houyaping thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT guofangfang thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT penghaishan thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT wangdongmei thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT duqianyi thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT yinaihua thesignificanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT qiyiming significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT yangjiexia significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT houyaping significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT guofangfang significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT penghaishan significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT wangdongmei significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT duqianyi significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening
AT yinaihua significanceoftrisomy7mosaicisminnoninvasiveprenatalscreening