Cargando…

Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation

PURPOSE: To perform quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy featuring continuous couch rotation (CCR-VMAT) using a C-arm linear accelerator. METHODS: We planned and delivered CCR-VMAT using the TrueBeam Developer Mode. Treatment plans were created for both a C-shaped phan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirashima, Hideaki, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Miyabe, Yuki, Mukumoto, Nobutaka, Ono, Tomohiro, Iramina, Hiraku, Mizowaki, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1264-6
_version_ 1783410070493593600
author Hirashima, Hideaki
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Miyabe, Yuki
Mukumoto, Nobutaka
Ono, Tomohiro
Iramina, Hiraku
Mizowaki, Takashi
author_facet Hirashima, Hideaki
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Miyabe, Yuki
Mukumoto, Nobutaka
Ono, Tomohiro
Iramina, Hiraku
Mizowaki, Takashi
author_sort Hirashima, Hideaki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To perform quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy featuring continuous couch rotation (CCR-VMAT) using a C-arm linear accelerator. METHODS: We planned and delivered CCR-VMAT using the TrueBeam Developer Mode. Treatment plans were created for both a C-shaped phantom and five prostate cancer patients using seven CCR trajectories that lacked collisions; we used RayStation software (ver. 4.7) to this end. Subsequently, verification plans were generated. The mean absolute error (MAE) between the center of an MV-imaged steel ball and the radiation field was calculated using the Winston–Lutz test. The MAEs between planned and actual irradiation values were also calculated from trajectory logs. In addition, correlation coefficients (r values) among the MAEs of gantry angle, couch angle, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) position, and mechanical parameters including gantry speed, couch speed, MLC speed, and beam output, were estimated. The dosimetric accuracies of planned and measured values were also assessed using ArcCHECK. RESULTS: The MAEs ±2 standard deviations as revealed by the Winston–Lutz test for all trajectories were 0.3 ± 0.3 mm in two dimensions. The MAEs of the gantry, couch, and MLC positions calculated from all trajectory logs were within 0.04°, 0.08°, and 0.02 mm, respectively. Deviations in the couch angle (r = 0.98, p < 0.05) and MLC position (r = 0.86, p < 0.05) increased significantly with speed. The MAE of the beam output error was less than 0.01 MU. The mean gamma passing rate ± 2 SD (range) of the 3%/3 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 5%/1 mm was 98.1 ± 1.9% (95.7–99.6%), 87.2 ± 2.8% (80.2–96.7%), and 96.3 ± 2.8% (93.9–99.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CCR-VMAT delivered via the TrueBeam Developer Mode was associated with high-level geometric and mechanical accuracy, thus affording to high dosimetric accuracy. The CCR-VMAT performance was stable regardless of the trajectory chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1264-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64587332019-04-19 Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation Hirashima, Hideaki Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Miyabe, Yuki Mukumoto, Nobutaka Ono, Tomohiro Iramina, Hiraku Mizowaki, Takashi Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To perform quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy featuring continuous couch rotation (CCR-VMAT) using a C-arm linear accelerator. METHODS: We planned and delivered CCR-VMAT using the TrueBeam Developer Mode. Treatment plans were created for both a C-shaped phantom and five prostate cancer patients using seven CCR trajectories that lacked collisions; we used RayStation software (ver. 4.7) to this end. Subsequently, verification plans were generated. The mean absolute error (MAE) between the center of an MV-imaged steel ball and the radiation field was calculated using the Winston–Lutz test. The MAEs between planned and actual irradiation values were also calculated from trajectory logs. In addition, correlation coefficients (r values) among the MAEs of gantry angle, couch angle, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) position, and mechanical parameters including gantry speed, couch speed, MLC speed, and beam output, were estimated. The dosimetric accuracies of planned and measured values were also assessed using ArcCHECK. RESULTS: The MAEs ±2 standard deviations as revealed by the Winston–Lutz test for all trajectories were 0.3 ± 0.3 mm in two dimensions. The MAEs of the gantry, couch, and MLC positions calculated from all trajectory logs were within 0.04°, 0.08°, and 0.02 mm, respectively. Deviations in the couch angle (r = 0.98, p < 0.05) and MLC position (r = 0.86, p < 0.05) increased significantly with speed. The MAE of the beam output error was less than 0.01 MU. The mean gamma passing rate ± 2 SD (range) of the 3%/3 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 5%/1 mm was 98.1 ± 1.9% (95.7–99.6%), 87.2 ± 2.8% (80.2–96.7%), and 96.3 ± 2.8% (93.9–99.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CCR-VMAT delivered via the TrueBeam Developer Mode was associated with high-level geometric and mechanical accuracy, thus affording to high dosimetric accuracy. The CCR-VMAT performance was stable regardless of the trajectory chosen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1264-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458733/ /pubmed/30971273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1264-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hirashima, Hideaki
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Miyabe, Yuki
Mukumoto, Nobutaka
Ono, Tomohiro
Iramina, Hiraku
Mizowaki, Takashi
Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title_full Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title_fullStr Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title_short Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
title_sort quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a c-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1264-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hirashimahideaki qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT nakamuramitsuhiro qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT miyabeyuki qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT mukumotonobutaka qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT onotomohiro qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT iraminahiraku qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation
AT mizowakitakashi qualityassuranceofnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyemployingacarmlinearacceleratorfeaturingcontinuouspatientcouchrotation