Cargando…

RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016

BACKGROUND: In April 2016, the Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) hosted an innovative, 2-day conference called Praxis 2016. RHI aimed to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to develop solutions for overcoming the challenges of translating spinal cord injury (SCI) research into practice. To unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gainforth, Heather L., Baxter, Kristy, Baron, Justine, Michalovic, Emilie, Caron, Jeffrey G., Sweet, Shane N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1
_version_ 1783410072113643520
author Gainforth, Heather L.
Baxter, Kristy
Baron, Justine
Michalovic, Emilie
Caron, Jeffrey G.
Sweet, Shane N.
author_facet Gainforth, Heather L.
Baxter, Kristy
Baron, Justine
Michalovic, Emilie
Caron, Jeffrey G.
Sweet, Shane N.
author_sort Gainforth, Heather L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In April 2016, the Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) hosted an innovative, 2-day conference called Praxis 2016. RHI aimed to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to develop solutions for overcoming the challenges of translating spinal cord injury (SCI) research into practice. To understand the impact of Praxis, RHI funded an independent team to evaluate Praxis at the individual and setting level using the RE-AIM framework. Individual-level findings are published elsewhere. The aim of this evaluation is to report on the impact of Praxis at the setting level in terms of its adoption, implementation and maintenance. METHODS: Data sources included interviews with attendees (n = 13) and organisers (n = 9), a fidelity assessment conducted at the conference, and observation notes provided by the evaluation team. RESULTS: Main findings indicated that the Praxis model was adopted by organisers and attendees, implemented by RHI as intended, and has the potential for long-term maintenance. Lessons learned highlighted the importance of including SCI community members throughout the entire process from development to post-conference activities as well as in the research process, the value of facilitation and fostering interactive problem solving, and the need to identify leadership and funds to foster long-term efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and implementing a solutions-focused conference that brings together a diverse group of SCI stakeholders was challenging and rewarding for attendees and organisers. Other domains could learn from, adopt and build on the Praxis 2016 approach to address research-to-practice gaps. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64587402019-04-19 RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016 Gainforth, Heather L. Baxter, Kristy Baron, Justine Michalovic, Emilie Caron, Jeffrey G. Sweet, Shane N. Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In April 2016, the Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) hosted an innovative, 2-day conference called Praxis 2016. RHI aimed to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to develop solutions for overcoming the challenges of translating spinal cord injury (SCI) research into practice. To understand the impact of Praxis, RHI funded an independent team to evaluate Praxis at the individual and setting level using the RE-AIM framework. Individual-level findings are published elsewhere. The aim of this evaluation is to report on the impact of Praxis at the setting level in terms of its adoption, implementation and maintenance. METHODS: Data sources included interviews with attendees (n = 13) and organisers (n = 9), a fidelity assessment conducted at the conference, and observation notes provided by the evaluation team. RESULTS: Main findings indicated that the Praxis model was adopted by organisers and attendees, implemented by RHI as intended, and has the potential for long-term maintenance. Lessons learned highlighted the importance of including SCI community members throughout the entire process from development to post-conference activities as well as in the research process, the value of facilitation and fostering interactive problem solving, and the need to identify leadership and funds to foster long-term efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and implementing a solutions-focused conference that brings together a diverse group of SCI stakeholders was challenging and rewarding for attendees and organisers. Other domains could learn from, adopt and build on the Praxis 2016 approach to address research-to-practice gaps. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458740/ /pubmed/30971267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gainforth, Heather L.
Baxter, Kristy
Baron, Justine
Michalovic, Emilie
Caron, Jeffrey G.
Sweet, Shane N.
RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title_full RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title_fullStr RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title_full_unstemmed RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title_short RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute’s Praxis 2016
title_sort re-aiming conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the rick hansen institute’s praxis 2016
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gainforthheatherl reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016
AT baxterkristy reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016
AT baronjustine reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016
AT michalovicemilie reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016
AT caronjeffreyg reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016
AT sweetshanen reaimingconferencesevaluatingtheadoptionimplementationandmaintenanceoftherickhanseninstitutespraxis2016