Cargando…
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
BACKGROUND: Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of results of evidence syntheses such as Cochrane reviews is problematic if the evidence is not prepared consistently. All systematic reviews should assess the risk of bias (RoB) in included studies, and in Coc...
Autores principales: | Babic, Andrija, Pijuk, Andela, Brázdilová, Lucie, Georgieva, Yuliyana, Raposo Pereira, Marco António, Poklepovic Pericic, Tina, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
por: Delaney, John, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)