Cargando…
Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5 |
_version_ | 1783410084552900608 |
---|---|
author | Preyer, Oliver Husslein, Heinrich Concin, Nicole Ridder, Anna Musielak, Maciej Pfeifer, Christian Oberaigner, Willi Husslein, Peter |
author_facet | Preyer, Oliver Husslein, Heinrich Concin, Nicole Ridder, Anna Musielak, Maciej Pfeifer, Christian Oberaigner, Willi Husslein, Peter |
author_sort | Preyer, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal BMI is a confounding factor because it is associated with both the fetal weight and the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation performed with ultrasound and with clinical examination with respect to BMI. METHODS: In this prospective blinded observational study we investigated the accuracy of clinical examination as compared to ultrasound measurement in fetal weight estimation, taking the actual birth weight as the gold standard. In a cohort of all consecutive patients who presented in our department from January 2016 to May 2017 to register for delivery at ≥37 weeks, examination was done by ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres to estimate fetal weight. All examiners (midwives and physicians) had about the same level of professional experience. The primary aim was to compare overall absolute error, overall absolute percent error, absolute percent error > 10% and absolute percent error > 20% for weight estimation by ultrasound and by means of Leopold’s manoeuvres versus the actual birth weight as the given gold standard, namely separately for normal weight and for overweight pregnant women. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-three patients were included in the data analysis. The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was significantly better with ultrasound than with Leopold’s manoeuvres in all absolute error calculations made in overweight pregnant women. For all error calculations performed in normal weight pregnant women, no statistically significant difference was seen in the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our prospective blinded observational study show a significantly better accuracy of ultrasound for fetal weight estimation in overweight pregnant women only as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres with a significant difference in absolute error. We did not observe significantly better accuracy of ultrasound as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres in normal weight women. Further research is needed to analyse the situation in normal weight women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6458793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64587932019-04-22 Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study Preyer, Oliver Husslein, Heinrich Concin, Nicole Ridder, Anna Musielak, Maciej Pfeifer, Christian Oberaigner, Willi Husslein, Peter BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal BMI is a confounding factor because it is associated with both the fetal weight and the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation performed with ultrasound and with clinical examination with respect to BMI. METHODS: In this prospective blinded observational study we investigated the accuracy of clinical examination as compared to ultrasound measurement in fetal weight estimation, taking the actual birth weight as the gold standard. In a cohort of all consecutive patients who presented in our department from January 2016 to May 2017 to register for delivery at ≥37 weeks, examination was done by ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres to estimate fetal weight. All examiners (midwives and physicians) had about the same level of professional experience. The primary aim was to compare overall absolute error, overall absolute percent error, absolute percent error > 10% and absolute percent error > 20% for weight estimation by ultrasound and by means of Leopold’s manoeuvres versus the actual birth weight as the given gold standard, namely separately for normal weight and for overweight pregnant women. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-three patients were included in the data analysis. The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was significantly better with ultrasound than with Leopold’s manoeuvres in all absolute error calculations made in overweight pregnant women. For all error calculations performed in normal weight pregnant women, no statistically significant difference was seen in the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our prospective blinded observational study show a significantly better accuracy of ultrasound for fetal weight estimation in overweight pregnant women only as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres with a significant difference in absolute error. We did not observe significantly better accuracy of ultrasound as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres in normal weight women. Further research is needed to analyse the situation in normal weight women. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458793/ /pubmed/30971199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Preyer, Oliver Husslein, Heinrich Concin, Nicole Ridder, Anna Musielak, Maciej Pfeifer, Christian Oberaigner, Willi Husslein, Peter Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title | Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title_full | Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title_fullStr | Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title_short | Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
title_sort | fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT preyeroliver fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT hussleinheinrich fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT concinnicole fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT ridderanna fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT musielakmaciej fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT pfeiferchristian fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT oberaignerwilli fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy AT hussleinpeter fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy |