Cargando…

Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study

BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preyer, Oliver, Husslein, Heinrich, Concin, Nicole, Ridder, Anna, Musielak, Maciej, Pfeifer, Christian, Oberaigner, Willi, Husslein, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5
_version_ 1783410084552900608
author Preyer, Oliver
Husslein, Heinrich
Concin, Nicole
Ridder, Anna
Musielak, Maciej
Pfeifer, Christian
Oberaigner, Willi
Husslein, Peter
author_facet Preyer, Oliver
Husslein, Heinrich
Concin, Nicole
Ridder, Anna
Musielak, Maciej
Pfeifer, Christian
Oberaigner, Willi
Husslein, Peter
author_sort Preyer, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal BMI is a confounding factor because it is associated with both the fetal weight and the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation performed with ultrasound and with clinical examination with respect to BMI. METHODS: In this prospective blinded observational study we investigated the accuracy of clinical examination as compared to ultrasound measurement in fetal weight estimation, taking the actual birth weight as the gold standard. In a cohort of all consecutive patients who presented in our department from January 2016 to May 2017 to register for delivery at ≥37 weeks, examination was done by ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres to estimate fetal weight. All examiners (midwives and physicians) had about the same level of professional experience. The primary aim was to compare overall absolute error, overall absolute percent error, absolute percent error > 10% and absolute percent error > 20% for weight estimation by ultrasound and by means of Leopold’s manoeuvres versus the actual birth weight as the given gold standard, namely separately for normal weight and for overweight pregnant women. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-three patients were included in the data analysis. The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was significantly better with ultrasound than with Leopold’s manoeuvres in all absolute error calculations made in overweight pregnant women. For all error calculations performed in normal weight pregnant women, no statistically significant difference was seen in the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our prospective blinded observational study show a significantly better accuracy of ultrasound for fetal weight estimation in overweight pregnant women only as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres with a significant difference in absolute error. We did not observe significantly better accuracy of ultrasound as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres in normal weight women. Further research is needed to analyse the situation in normal weight women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64587932019-04-22 Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study Preyer, Oliver Husslein, Heinrich Concin, Nicole Ridder, Anna Musielak, Maciej Pfeifer, Christian Oberaigner, Willi Husslein, Peter BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Fetal weight estimation is of key importance in the decision-making process for obstetric planning and management. The literature is inconsistent on the accuracy of measurements with either ultrasound or clinical examination, known as Leopold’s manoeuvres, shortly before term. Maternal BMI is a confounding factor because it is associated with both the fetal weight and the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation performed with ultrasound and with clinical examination with respect to BMI. METHODS: In this prospective blinded observational study we investigated the accuracy of clinical examination as compared to ultrasound measurement in fetal weight estimation, taking the actual birth weight as the gold standard. In a cohort of all consecutive patients who presented in our department from January 2016 to May 2017 to register for delivery at ≥37 weeks, examination was done by ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres to estimate fetal weight. All examiners (midwives and physicians) had about the same level of professional experience. The primary aim was to compare overall absolute error, overall absolute percent error, absolute percent error > 10% and absolute percent error > 20% for weight estimation by ultrasound and by means of Leopold’s manoeuvres versus the actual birth weight as the given gold standard, namely separately for normal weight and for overweight pregnant women. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-three patients were included in the data analysis. The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was significantly better with ultrasound than with Leopold’s manoeuvres in all absolute error calculations made in overweight pregnant women. For all error calculations performed in normal weight pregnant women, no statistically significant difference was seen in the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between ultrasound and Leopold’s manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our prospective blinded observational study show a significantly better accuracy of ultrasound for fetal weight estimation in overweight pregnant women only as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres with a significant difference in absolute error. We did not observe significantly better accuracy of ultrasound as compared to Leopold’s manoeuvres in normal weight women. Further research is needed to analyse the situation in normal weight women. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458793/ /pubmed/30971199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Preyer, Oliver
Husslein, Heinrich
Concin, Nicole
Ridder, Anna
Musielak, Maciej
Pfeifer, Christian
Oberaigner, Willi
Husslein, Peter
Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title_full Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title_fullStr Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title_full_unstemmed Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title_short Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
title_sort fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2251-5
work_keys_str_mv AT preyeroliver fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT hussleinheinrich fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT concinnicole fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT ridderanna fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT musielakmaciej fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT pfeiferchristian fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT oberaignerwilli fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy
AT hussleinpeter fetalweightestimationattermultrasoundversusclinicalexaminationwithleopoldsmanoeuvresaprospectiveblindedobservationalstudy