Cargando…

Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) is regarded as one of the highest risk interventions that pre-hospital providers perform. AAGBI guidance from 2017 suggests the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to audit PHEA quality. The aim of this study was to develop KPIs for use in o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raitt, James, Hudgell, James, Knott, Henry, Masud, Syed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0610-x
_version_ 1783410091362353152
author Raitt, James
Hudgell, James
Knott, Henry
Masud, Syed
author_facet Raitt, James
Hudgell, James
Knott, Henry
Masud, Syed
author_sort Raitt, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) is regarded as one of the highest risk interventions that pre-hospital providers perform. AAGBI guidance from 2017 suggests the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to audit PHEA quality. The aim of this study was to develop KPIs for use in our service and evaluate their impact. METHODS: Using the AAGBI 2017 document as a guide we developed a list of ten auditable domains. Data for each case was extracted from the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) and a score assigned to each of the domains; one if the domain is achieved and zero if the domain is not achieved or if data is missing, giving a total score out of ten. This analysis is then presented as a colour-coded matrix alongside the score. Data were analysed monthly at our case review and governance meeting. The process was refined during the year and after 12 months a formal review of the KPI process occurred. RESULTS: Eighty-two cases were analysed. Domains with the highest percentage of achievement were: Indication 96%; Tube position confirmed 94% and Full AAGBI monitoring and Grade of view < 3 both 89%. The amount of missing data declined throughout the year. The results of the clinician survey showed that almost all respondents found the TVAA PHEA review process useful. CONCLUSION: The KPI process has demonstrated areas of good quality practice and led to improvements in equipment, processes and documentation and therefore patient care. We offer suggestions to other organisations considering implementing KPIs for PHEA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64588222019-04-22 Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation Raitt, James Hudgell, James Knott, Henry Masud, Syed Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) is regarded as one of the highest risk interventions that pre-hospital providers perform. AAGBI guidance from 2017 suggests the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to audit PHEA quality. The aim of this study was to develop KPIs for use in our service and evaluate their impact. METHODS: Using the AAGBI 2017 document as a guide we developed a list of ten auditable domains. Data for each case was extracted from the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) and a score assigned to each of the domains; one if the domain is achieved and zero if the domain is not achieved or if data is missing, giving a total score out of ten. This analysis is then presented as a colour-coded matrix alongside the score. Data were analysed monthly at our case review and governance meeting. The process was refined during the year and after 12 months a formal review of the KPI process occurred. RESULTS: Eighty-two cases were analysed. Domains with the highest percentage of achievement were: Indication 96%; Tube position confirmed 94% and Full AAGBI monitoring and Grade of view < 3 both 89%. The amount of missing data declined throughout the year. The results of the clinician survey showed that almost all respondents found the TVAA PHEA review process useful. CONCLUSION: The KPI process has demonstrated areas of good quality practice and led to improvements in equipment, processes and documentation and therefore patient care. We offer suggestions to other organisations considering implementing KPIs for PHEA. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458822/ /pubmed/30975182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0610-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Raitt, James
Hudgell, James
Knott, Henry
Masud, Syed
Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title_full Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title_fullStr Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title_full_unstemmed Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title_short Key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency Anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
title_sort key performance indicators for pre hospital emergency anaesthesia - a suggested approach for implementation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0610-x
work_keys_str_mv AT raittjames keyperformanceindicatorsforprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaasuggestedapproachforimplementation
AT hudgelljames keyperformanceindicatorsforprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaasuggestedapproachforimplementation
AT knotthenry keyperformanceindicatorsforprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaasuggestedapproachforimplementation
AT masudsyed keyperformanceindicatorsforprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaasuggestedapproachforimplementation