Cargando…

Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH

BACKGROUND: Intravenous morphine titration (IVMT) is the French gold standard for opioid treatment in the emergency department (ED). Nebulized morphine titration (NMT) may represent an alternative without venous access, but it has not been adequately studied in adults. We test the hypothesis that NM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lvovschi, Virginie Eve, Joly, Justine, Lemaire, Nicolas, Maignan, Maxime, Canavaggio, Pauline, Leroi, Anne-Marie, Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre, Joly, Luc-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3
_version_ 1783410092057559040
author Lvovschi, Virginie Eve
Joly, Justine
Lemaire, Nicolas
Maignan, Maxime
Canavaggio, Pauline
Leroi, Anne-Marie
Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre
Joly, Luc-Marie
author_facet Lvovschi, Virginie Eve
Joly, Justine
Lemaire, Nicolas
Maignan, Maxime
Canavaggio, Pauline
Leroi, Anne-Marie
Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre
Joly, Luc-Marie
author_sort Lvovschi, Virginie Eve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravenous morphine titration (IVMT) is the French gold standard for opioid treatment in the emergency department (ED). Nebulized morphine titration (NMT) may represent an alternative without venous access, but it has not been adequately studied in adults. We test the hypothesis that NMT is at least as effective as IVMT to initially manage severe acute pain in the ED. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a multicenter (10 French EDs), single-blind, randomized and controlled trial. Adults between 18 and 75 years with visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 70/100 or numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 7/10 will be enrolled. We will randomize 850 patients into two groups to compare two routes of MT as long as VAS >  30 or NRS >  3. In group A (425), patients will receive an initial NMT for 5–25 min associated with titration of an intravenously (IV) administered placebo of physiologic serum (PS). In group B (425), patients will receive IVMT plus nebulized PS placebo. NMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 5-min nebulized boluses of 10 mg or 15 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 10-min fixed intervals. IVMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 6 boluses of 2 mg or 3 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 5-min fixed intervals. Nebulized placebo titration will be performed every 10 min. IV titration of PS will be performed every 5 min. In both groups, after 25 min, if VAS > 30/100 or NRS > 3/10, routine IVMT will be continued until pain relief. Pain severity, vital signs, bronchospasm, and Ramsay score will be recorded every 5 min. The primary outcome is the rate of relief obtained 1 h from the start of drug administration. Complete pain relief in both groups will be compared with a non-inferiority design. Secondary outcomes are pain relief at 30 min (the end of NMT) and at 2 h and median pain relief. We will compare final doses, and study the feasibility and tolerance of NMT (protocol deviations, respiratory or hemodynamic depression, sedation, and minor vegetative side effects). Co-analgesia will be recorded. Discharge criteria from the ED and hospital are defined. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first multicenter randomized and controlled NMT protocol for severe pain in the ED using the titration concept. We propose an original approach of combined titration with an endpoint at 1 h and a non-inferiority design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03257319. Registered on 22 August 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6458825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64588252019-04-22 Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH Lvovschi, Virginie Eve Joly, Justine Lemaire, Nicolas Maignan, Maxime Canavaggio, Pauline Leroi, Anne-Marie Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre Joly, Luc-Marie Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Intravenous morphine titration (IVMT) is the French gold standard for opioid treatment in the emergency department (ED). Nebulized morphine titration (NMT) may represent an alternative without venous access, but it has not been adequately studied in adults. We test the hypothesis that NMT is at least as effective as IVMT to initially manage severe acute pain in the ED. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a multicenter (10 French EDs), single-blind, randomized and controlled trial. Adults between 18 and 75 years with visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 70/100 or numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 7/10 will be enrolled. We will randomize 850 patients into two groups to compare two routes of MT as long as VAS >  30 or NRS >  3. In group A (425), patients will receive an initial NMT for 5–25 min associated with titration of an intravenously (IV) administered placebo of physiologic serum (PS). In group B (425), patients will receive IVMT plus nebulized PS placebo. NMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 5-min nebulized boluses of 10 mg or 15 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 10-min fixed intervals. IVMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 6 boluses of 2 mg or 3 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 5-min fixed intervals. Nebulized placebo titration will be performed every 10 min. IV titration of PS will be performed every 5 min. In both groups, after 25 min, if VAS > 30/100 or NRS > 3/10, routine IVMT will be continued until pain relief. Pain severity, vital signs, bronchospasm, and Ramsay score will be recorded every 5 min. The primary outcome is the rate of relief obtained 1 h from the start of drug administration. Complete pain relief in both groups will be compared with a non-inferiority design. Secondary outcomes are pain relief at 30 min (the end of NMT) and at 2 h and median pain relief. We will compare final doses, and study the feasibility and tolerance of NMT (protocol deviations, respiratory or hemodynamic depression, sedation, and minor vegetative side effects). Co-analgesia will be recorded. Discharge criteria from the ED and hospital are defined. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first multicenter randomized and controlled NMT protocol for severe pain in the ED using the titration concept. We propose an original approach of combined titration with an endpoint at 1 h and a non-inferiority design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03257319. Registered on 22 August 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6458825/ /pubmed/30975187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lvovschi, Virginie Eve
Joly, Justine
Lemaire, Nicolas
Maignan, Maxime
Canavaggio, Pauline
Leroi, Anne-Marie
Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre
Joly, Luc-Marie
Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title_full Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title_fullStr Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title_full_unstemmed Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title_short Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
title_sort nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, clin-aeromorph
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lvovschivirginieeve nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT jolyjustine nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT lemairenicolas nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT maignanmaxime nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT canavaggiopauline nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT leroiannemarie nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT tavolaccimariepierre nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph
AT jolylucmarie nebulizedversusintravenousmorphinetitrationfortheinitialtreatmentofsevereacutepainintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialclinaeromorph