Cargando…

Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Introduction: Post-implantation rod deformation is anticipated in scoliosis surgery but the difference in rod deformation between titanium and cobalt chrome rod has not been elucidated. This study aims to compare the difference in rod deformation between two groups. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sia, U, Tan, BB, Teo, YY, Wong, CC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001378
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1903.002
_version_ 1783410132801028096
author Sia, U
Tan, BB
Teo, YY
Wong, CC
author_facet Sia, U
Tan, BB
Teo, YY
Wong, CC
author_sort Sia, U
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Post-implantation rod deformation is anticipated in scoliosis surgery but the difference in rod deformation between titanium and cobalt chrome rod has not been elucidated. This study aims to compare the difference in rod deformation between two groups. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were recruited from a single center. The over-contoured concave rods were traced prior to insertion. Post-operative sagittal rod shape was determined from lateral radiographs. Rod deformation was determined using maximal rod deflection and angle of the tangents to rod end points. The differences between pre- and post-operative rod contour were analysed statistically. Rod deformation and thoracic kyphosis between two types of implants were analysed. Results: Both rods exhibited significant change of rod angle and deflection post-operatively. Curvature of the titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod decreased from 60.5° to 37°, and 51° to 28° respectively. Deflection of titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod reduced from 28mm to 23.5mm and 30mm to 17mm respectively. There was no significant difference between titanium and cobalt chrome groups with regard to rod angle (p=0.173) and deflection (p=0.654). Thoracic kyphosis was increased from 20° to 26° in titanium group but a reduction from 25° to 23° was noticed in cobalt chrome group, but these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in rod deformation between the two groups. Thus, the use of titanium rod in correction of sagittal profile is not inferior in outcome compared with cobalt chrome but with lower cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64590342019-04-18 Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Sia, U Tan, BB Teo, YY Wong, CC Malays Orthop J Original Article Introduction: Post-implantation rod deformation is anticipated in scoliosis surgery but the difference in rod deformation between titanium and cobalt chrome rod has not been elucidated. This study aims to compare the difference in rod deformation between two groups. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were recruited from a single center. The over-contoured concave rods were traced prior to insertion. Post-operative sagittal rod shape was determined from lateral radiographs. Rod deformation was determined using maximal rod deflection and angle of the tangents to rod end points. The differences between pre- and post-operative rod contour were analysed statistically. Rod deformation and thoracic kyphosis between two types of implants were analysed. Results: Both rods exhibited significant change of rod angle and deflection post-operatively. Curvature of the titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod decreased from 60.5° to 37°, and 51° to 28° respectively. Deflection of titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod reduced from 28mm to 23.5mm and 30mm to 17mm respectively. There was no significant difference between titanium and cobalt chrome groups with regard to rod angle (p=0.173) and deflection (p=0.654). Thoracic kyphosis was increased from 20° to 26° in titanium group but a reduction from 25° to 23° was noticed in cobalt chrome group, but these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in rod deformation between the two groups. Thus, the use of titanium rod in correction of sagittal profile is not inferior in outcome compared with cobalt chrome but with lower cost. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6459034/ /pubmed/31001378 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1903.002 Text en © 2019 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Article
Sia, U
Tan, BB
Teo, YY
Wong, CC
Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title_full Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title_fullStr Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title_short Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
title_sort post-implantation deformation of titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001378
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1903.002
work_keys_str_mv AT siau postimplantationdeformationoftitaniumrodandcobaltchromerodinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT tanbb postimplantationdeformationoftitaniumrodandcobaltchromerodinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT teoyy postimplantationdeformationoftitaniumrodandcobaltchromerodinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT wongcc postimplantationdeformationoftitaniumrodandcobaltchromerodinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis