Cargando…

Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers

Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is “invaded” by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dempsey-Jones, Harriet, Themistocleous, Andreas C., Carone, Davide, Ng, Tammy W. C., Harrar, Vanessa, Makin, Tamar R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000514
_version_ 1783410141649960960
author Dempsey-Jones, Harriet
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Carone, Davide
Ng, Tammy W. C.
Harrar, Vanessa
Makin, Tamar R.
author_facet Dempsey-Jones, Harriet
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Carone, Davide
Ng, Tammy W. C.
Harrar, Vanessa
Makin, Tamar R.
author_sort Dempsey-Jones, Harriet
collection PubMed
description Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is “invaded” by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization leads to functional benefits for the invading representation, the behavioral evidence is controversial. Here, we investigate whether a temporary period of somatosensory input loss to one finger, induced by anesthetic block, is sufficient to cause improvements in touch perception (“direct” effects of deafferentation). Further, we determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training (“interactive” effects). Importantly, we explore whether direct and interactive effects of deprivation are dissociable by directly comparing their effects on touch perception. Using psychophysical thresholds, we found brief deprivation alone caused improvements in tactile perception of a finger adjacent to the blocked finger but not to non-neighboring fingers. Two additional groups underwent minimal tactile training to one finger either during anesthetic block of the neighboring finger or a sham block with saline. Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. That is, following deafferentation and training, learning gains were seen in fingers normally outside the boundaries of topographic transfer of tactile perceptual learning. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning. This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64590892019-04-19 Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers Dempsey-Jones, Harriet Themistocleous, Andreas C. Carone, Davide Ng, Tammy W. C. Harrar, Vanessa Makin, Tamar R. J Exp Psychol Gen Articles Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is “invaded” by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization leads to functional benefits for the invading representation, the behavioral evidence is controversial. Here, we investigate whether a temporary period of somatosensory input loss to one finger, induced by anesthetic block, is sufficient to cause improvements in touch perception (“direct” effects of deafferentation). Further, we determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training (“interactive” effects). Importantly, we explore whether direct and interactive effects of deprivation are dissociable by directly comparing their effects on touch perception. Using psychophysical thresholds, we found brief deprivation alone caused improvements in tactile perception of a finger adjacent to the blocked finger but not to non-neighboring fingers. Two additional groups underwent minimal tactile training to one finger either during anesthetic block of the neighboring finger or a sham block with saline. Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. That is, following deafferentation and training, learning gains were seen in fingers normally outside the boundaries of topographic transfer of tactile perceptual learning. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning. This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation. American Psychological Association 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6459089/ /pubmed/30973263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000514 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Articles
Dempsey-Jones, Harriet
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Carone, Davide
Ng, Tammy W. C.
Harrar, Vanessa
Makin, Tamar R.
Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title_full Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title_fullStr Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title_full_unstemmed Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title_short Blocking Tactile Input to One Finger Using Anaesthetic Enhances Touch Perception and Learning in Other Fingers
title_sort blocking tactile input to one finger using anaesthetic enhances touch perception and learning in other fingers
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000514
work_keys_str_mv AT dempseyjonesharriet blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers
AT themistocleousandreasc blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers
AT caronedavide blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers
AT ngtammywc blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers
AT harrarvanessa blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers
AT makintamarr blockingtactileinputtoonefingerusinganaestheticenhancestouchperceptionandlearninginotherfingers