Cargando…

Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Despite the common nature of this disease, there is a poor understanding of biomarkers that predict responsiveness to immunotherapeutic agents such as the programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manogue, Charlotte, Cotogno, Patrick, Ledet, Elisa, Lewis, Brian, Wyatt, Alexander W., Sartor, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0546
_version_ 1783410156354142208
author Manogue, Charlotte
Cotogno, Patrick
Ledet, Elisa
Lewis, Brian
Wyatt, Alexander W.
Sartor, Oliver
author_facet Manogue, Charlotte
Cotogno, Patrick
Ledet, Elisa
Lewis, Brian
Wyatt, Alexander W.
Sartor, Oliver
author_sort Manogue, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Despite the common nature of this disease, there is a poor understanding of biomarkers that predict responsiveness to immunotherapeutic agents such as the programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors. Herein we describe a case of complete remission with pembrolizumab therapy in a metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patient with a complex germline MSH2 alteration (Boland inversion) in association with a tumor demonstrating high microsatellite instability. Potential utility of high mutational burden assessed by an experimental circulating tumor DNA assay is also shown. The literature concerning biomarkers for PD‐1 inhibition is reviewed, including data for various mismatch repair gene deficiencies, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, PD‐L1 3' untranslated region mutations, selected POLE mutations, and biallelic CDK12 mutations. Taken together, although prostate cancer is generally believed to be a tumor unresponsive to PD‐1 inhibition, careful dissection of tumor biology is able to provide an approach toward predictive biomarkers that has the potential for expanded clinical utility. KEY POINTS. Biomarkers for anti‐PD1 and anti‐PDL1 therapy are poorly defined in prostate cancer. Recent advances are defining new important classes of responsive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64592472019-06-20 Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer Manogue, Charlotte Cotogno, Patrick Ledet, Elisa Lewis, Brian Wyatt, Alexander W. Sartor, Oliver Oncologist Precision Medicine Clinic: Molecular Tumor Board Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Despite the common nature of this disease, there is a poor understanding of biomarkers that predict responsiveness to immunotherapeutic agents such as the programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors. Herein we describe a case of complete remission with pembrolizumab therapy in a metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer patient with a complex germline MSH2 alteration (Boland inversion) in association with a tumor demonstrating high microsatellite instability. Potential utility of high mutational burden assessed by an experimental circulating tumor DNA assay is also shown. The literature concerning biomarkers for PD‐1 inhibition is reviewed, including data for various mismatch repair gene deficiencies, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, PD‐L1 3' untranslated region mutations, selected POLE mutations, and biallelic CDK12 mutations. Taken together, although prostate cancer is generally believed to be a tumor unresponsive to PD‐1 inhibition, careful dissection of tumor biology is able to provide an approach toward predictive biomarkers that has the potential for expanded clinical utility. KEY POINTS. Biomarkers for anti‐PD1 and anti‐PDL1 therapy are poorly defined in prostate cancer. Recent advances are defining new important classes of responsive patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-12-12 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6459247/ /pubmed/30541755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0546 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2018
spellingShingle Precision Medicine Clinic: Molecular Tumor Board
Manogue, Charlotte
Cotogno, Patrick
Ledet, Elisa
Lewis, Brian
Wyatt, Alexander W.
Sartor, Oliver
Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title_full Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title_short Biomarkers for Programmed Death‐1 Inhibition in Prostate Cancer
title_sort biomarkers for programmed death‐1 inhibition in prostate cancer
topic Precision Medicine Clinic: Molecular Tumor Board
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0546
work_keys_str_mv AT manoguecharlotte biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer
AT cotognopatrick biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer
AT ledetelisa biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer
AT lewisbrian biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer
AT wyattalexanderw biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer
AT sartoroliver biomarkersforprogrammeddeath1inhibitioninprostatecancer