Cargando…
Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was devel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316 |
_version_ | 1783410194949079040 |
---|---|
author | Schwerk, Birthe Harder, Lisa Windhövel, Claudia Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion Wagner, Anna Bach, Jan-Peter Voigt, Lena Carolin Hinze, Ulf Chichkov, Boris Haferkamp, Heinz Lubatschowski, Holger Nikolic, Stephan Nolte, Ingo |
author_facet | Schwerk, Birthe Harder, Lisa Windhövel, Claudia Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion Wagner, Anna Bach, Jan-Peter Voigt, Lena Carolin Hinze, Ulf Chichkov, Boris Haferkamp, Heinz Lubatschowski, Holger Nikolic, Stephan Nolte, Ingo |
author_sort | Schwerk, Birthe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was developed. The valve opening of the implant should eliminate inflammatory products from the outflow area and affect fibrous tissue formation to achieve a sufficient long-term aqueous humour outflow. Lifting of this valve should disturb cell adhesion by exerting mechanical forces. Before testing this hypothesis, the flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage devices, especially the outflow resistance by regular IOP, should be considered in a pilot study, as they are important in preventing too low postoperative intraocular pressure known as ocular hypotony. Therefore, two prototypes of the innovative implant differing in their valve area design were examined regarding their flow characteristics in a limited animal experiment lasting two weeks. Ten healthy New Zealand White rabbits were divided into two groups (A & B) with different implanted prototypes. Daily, tonometry and direct ophthalmoscopy were performed to assess the intraocular pressure and the inflammatory reaction of the eye. After two weeks, the rabbits were euthanised to evaluate the initially histological inflammatory reaction to the implant. In group A, one case of hypotony emerged. When considering the entire observation period, a highly statistically significant difference between the intraocular pressure in the operated eye and that in the control eye was detected in group A (p < 0.0001) in contrast to group B (p = 0.0063). The postoperative inflammatory signs decreased within two weeks. Histologically, a typical but low level foreign body reaction with macrophages and lymphocytes as well as mild to moderate fibrosis was seen after the short experimental period. Based on our tonometric results, prototype B seems to be the system of choice for further research assessing its long-term function and biocompatibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6459522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64595222019-05-03 Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits Schwerk, Birthe Harder, Lisa Windhövel, Claudia Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion Wagner, Anna Bach, Jan-Peter Voigt, Lena Carolin Hinze, Ulf Chichkov, Boris Haferkamp, Heinz Lubatschowski, Holger Nikolic, Stephan Nolte, Ingo PLoS One Research Article Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was developed. The valve opening of the implant should eliminate inflammatory products from the outflow area and affect fibrous tissue formation to achieve a sufficient long-term aqueous humour outflow. Lifting of this valve should disturb cell adhesion by exerting mechanical forces. Before testing this hypothesis, the flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage devices, especially the outflow resistance by regular IOP, should be considered in a pilot study, as they are important in preventing too low postoperative intraocular pressure known as ocular hypotony. Therefore, two prototypes of the innovative implant differing in their valve area design were examined regarding their flow characteristics in a limited animal experiment lasting two weeks. Ten healthy New Zealand White rabbits were divided into two groups (A & B) with different implanted prototypes. Daily, tonometry and direct ophthalmoscopy were performed to assess the intraocular pressure and the inflammatory reaction of the eye. After two weeks, the rabbits were euthanised to evaluate the initially histological inflammatory reaction to the implant. In group A, one case of hypotony emerged. When considering the entire observation period, a highly statistically significant difference between the intraocular pressure in the operated eye and that in the control eye was detected in group A (p < 0.0001) in contrast to group B (p = 0.0063). The postoperative inflammatory signs decreased within two weeks. Histologically, a typical but low level foreign body reaction with macrophages and lymphocytes as well as mild to moderate fibrosis was seen after the short experimental period. Based on our tonometric results, prototype B seems to be the system of choice for further research assessing its long-term function and biocompatibility. Public Library of Science 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6459522/ /pubmed/30973952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316 Text en © 2019 Schwerk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schwerk, Birthe Harder, Lisa Windhövel, Claudia Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion Wagner, Anna Bach, Jan-Peter Voigt, Lena Carolin Hinze, Ulf Chichkov, Boris Haferkamp, Heinz Lubatschowski, Holger Nikolic, Stephan Nolte, Ingo Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title | Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title_full | Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title_short | Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
title_sort | comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwerkbirthe comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT harderlisa comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT windhovelclaudia comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT hewickertrautweinmarion comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT wagneranna comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT bachjanpeter comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT voigtlenacarolin comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT hinzeulf comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT chichkovboris comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT haferkampheinz comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT lubatschowskiholger comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT nikolicstephan comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits AT nolteingo comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits |