Cargando…

Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits

Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwerk, Birthe, Harder, Lisa, Windhövel, Claudia, Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion, Wagner, Anna, Bach, Jan-Peter, Voigt, Lena Carolin, Hinze, Ulf, Chichkov, Boris, Haferkamp, Heinz, Lubatschowski, Holger, Nikolic, Stephan, Nolte, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316
_version_ 1783410194949079040
author Schwerk, Birthe
Harder, Lisa
Windhövel, Claudia
Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion
Wagner, Anna
Bach, Jan-Peter
Voigt, Lena Carolin
Hinze, Ulf
Chichkov, Boris
Haferkamp, Heinz
Lubatschowski, Holger
Nikolic, Stephan
Nolte, Ingo
author_facet Schwerk, Birthe
Harder, Lisa
Windhövel, Claudia
Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion
Wagner, Anna
Bach, Jan-Peter
Voigt, Lena Carolin
Hinze, Ulf
Chichkov, Boris
Haferkamp, Heinz
Lubatschowski, Holger
Nikolic, Stephan
Nolte, Ingo
author_sort Schwerk, Birthe
collection PubMed
description Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was developed. The valve opening of the implant should eliminate inflammatory products from the outflow area and affect fibrous tissue formation to achieve a sufficient long-term aqueous humour outflow. Lifting of this valve should disturb cell adhesion by exerting mechanical forces. Before testing this hypothesis, the flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage devices, especially the outflow resistance by regular IOP, should be considered in a pilot study, as they are important in preventing too low postoperative intraocular pressure known as ocular hypotony. Therefore, two prototypes of the innovative implant differing in their valve area design were examined regarding their flow characteristics in a limited animal experiment lasting two weeks. Ten healthy New Zealand White rabbits were divided into two groups (A & B) with different implanted prototypes. Daily, tonometry and direct ophthalmoscopy were performed to assess the intraocular pressure and the inflammatory reaction of the eye. After two weeks, the rabbits were euthanised to evaluate the initially histological inflammatory reaction to the implant. In group A, one case of hypotony emerged. When considering the entire observation period, a highly statistically significant difference between the intraocular pressure in the operated eye and that in the control eye was detected in group A (p < 0.0001) in contrast to group B (p = 0.0063). The postoperative inflammatory signs decreased within two weeks. Histologically, a typical but low level foreign body reaction with macrophages and lymphocytes as well as mild to moderate fibrosis was seen after the short experimental period. Based on our tonometric results, prototype B seems to be the system of choice for further research assessing its long-term function and biocompatibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64595222019-05-03 Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits Schwerk, Birthe Harder, Lisa Windhövel, Claudia Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion Wagner, Anna Bach, Jan-Peter Voigt, Lena Carolin Hinze, Ulf Chichkov, Boris Haferkamp, Heinz Lubatschowski, Holger Nikolic, Stephan Nolte, Ingo PLoS One Research Article Glaucoma drainage devices are used in surgical glaucoma therapy. Success of controlling the intraocular pressure is limited due to fibrous implant encapsulation and fibrin coating on the implant which lead to drainage obstructions. An innovative implant with a magnetically adjustable valve was developed. The valve opening of the implant should eliminate inflammatory products from the outflow area and affect fibrous tissue formation to achieve a sufficient long-term aqueous humour outflow. Lifting of this valve should disturb cell adhesion by exerting mechanical forces. Before testing this hypothesis, the flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage devices, especially the outflow resistance by regular IOP, should be considered in a pilot study, as they are important in preventing too low postoperative intraocular pressure known as ocular hypotony. Therefore, two prototypes of the innovative implant differing in their valve area design were examined regarding their flow characteristics in a limited animal experiment lasting two weeks. Ten healthy New Zealand White rabbits were divided into two groups (A & B) with different implanted prototypes. Daily, tonometry and direct ophthalmoscopy were performed to assess the intraocular pressure and the inflammatory reaction of the eye. After two weeks, the rabbits were euthanised to evaluate the initially histological inflammatory reaction to the implant. In group A, one case of hypotony emerged. When considering the entire observation period, a highly statistically significant difference between the intraocular pressure in the operated eye and that in the control eye was detected in group A (p < 0.0001) in contrast to group B (p = 0.0063). The postoperative inflammatory signs decreased within two weeks. Histologically, a typical but low level foreign body reaction with macrophages and lymphocytes as well as mild to moderate fibrosis was seen after the short experimental period. Based on our tonometric results, prototype B seems to be the system of choice for further research assessing its long-term function and biocompatibility. Public Library of Science 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6459522/ /pubmed/30973952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316 Text en © 2019 Schwerk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwerk, Birthe
Harder, Lisa
Windhövel, Claudia
Hewicker-Trautwein, Marion
Wagner, Anna
Bach, Jan-Peter
Voigt, Lena Carolin
Hinze, Ulf
Chichkov, Boris
Haferkamp, Heinz
Lubatschowski, Holger
Nikolic, Stephan
Nolte, Ingo
Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title_full Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title_short Comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
title_sort comparison of two prototypes of a magnetically adjustable glaucoma implant in rabbits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215316
work_keys_str_mv AT schwerkbirthe comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT harderlisa comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT windhovelclaudia comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT hewickertrautweinmarion comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT wagneranna comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT bachjanpeter comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT voigtlenacarolin comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT hinzeulf comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT chichkovboris comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT haferkampheinz comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT lubatschowskiholger comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT nikolicstephan comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits
AT nolteingo comparisonoftwoprototypesofamagneticallyadjustableglaucomaimplantinrabbits