Cargando…

Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication

RATIONALE: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require the care of specialist physicians for clinical or procedural expertise. The current state of communication between specialist physicians and families and nurses has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: To document the receip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roche, Stephanie D., Reichheld, Alyse M., Demosthenes, Nicholas, Johansson, Anna C., Howell, Michael D., Cocchi, Michael N., Landon, Bruce E., Stevens, Jennifer P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214918
_version_ 1783410211005923328
author Roche, Stephanie D.
Reichheld, Alyse M.
Demosthenes, Nicholas
Johansson, Anna C.
Howell, Michael D.
Cocchi, Michael N.
Landon, Bruce E.
Stevens, Jennifer P.
author_facet Roche, Stephanie D.
Reichheld, Alyse M.
Demosthenes, Nicholas
Johansson, Anna C.
Howell, Michael D.
Cocchi, Michael N.
Landon, Bruce E.
Stevens, Jennifer P.
author_sort Roche, Stephanie D.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require the care of specialist physicians for clinical or procedural expertise. The current state of communication between specialist physicians and families and nurses has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: To document the receipt of communication by nurses and family members regarding consultations performed on their patient or loved one, and to quantify how this impacts their overall perceptions of the quality of specialty care. METHODS: Prospective survey of 60 adult family members and 90 nurses of 189 ICU patients who received a specialist consultation between March and October of 2015 in a single academic medical center in the United States. Surveys measured the prevalence of direct communication—defined as communication conducted in person, via telephone, or via text-page in which the specialist team gathered information about the patient from the nurse/family member and/or shared recommendations for care—and perceived quality of care. RESULTS: In about two-thirds of family surveys (40/60) and one-half of nurse surveys (75/160), respondents had no direct communication with the specialist team that performed the consultation. Compared to nurses who had no direct communication with the specialists, those who did were 1.5 times more likely to rate the consultation as “excellent” (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.2–1.8, p<0.001). Nearly 40% (22/60) of families knew so little about the consultation that they felt incapable of evaluating it. CONCLUSIONS: Most ICU families and nurses have no interaction with specialist providers. Nurses’ frequent exclusion from conversations about specialty care may pose safety risks and increase the likelihood of mixed messages for patients and families, most of whom desire some interaction with specialists. Future research is needed to identify effective mechanisms for information sharing that keep nurses and families aware of consultation requests, delivery, and outcomes without increasing the risk of mixed messages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64595952019-05-03 Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication Roche, Stephanie D. Reichheld, Alyse M. Demosthenes, Nicholas Johansson, Anna C. Howell, Michael D. Cocchi, Michael N. Landon, Bruce E. Stevens, Jennifer P. PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require the care of specialist physicians for clinical or procedural expertise. The current state of communication between specialist physicians and families and nurses has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: To document the receipt of communication by nurses and family members regarding consultations performed on their patient or loved one, and to quantify how this impacts their overall perceptions of the quality of specialty care. METHODS: Prospective survey of 60 adult family members and 90 nurses of 189 ICU patients who received a specialist consultation between March and October of 2015 in a single academic medical center in the United States. Surveys measured the prevalence of direct communication—defined as communication conducted in person, via telephone, or via text-page in which the specialist team gathered information about the patient from the nurse/family member and/or shared recommendations for care—and perceived quality of care. RESULTS: In about two-thirds of family surveys (40/60) and one-half of nurse surveys (75/160), respondents had no direct communication with the specialist team that performed the consultation. Compared to nurses who had no direct communication with the specialists, those who did were 1.5 times more likely to rate the consultation as “excellent” (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.2–1.8, p<0.001). Nearly 40% (22/60) of families knew so little about the consultation that they felt incapable of evaluating it. CONCLUSIONS: Most ICU families and nurses have no interaction with specialist providers. Nurses’ frequent exclusion from conversations about specialty care may pose safety risks and increase the likelihood of mixed messages for patients and families, most of whom desire some interaction with specialists. Future research is needed to identify effective mechanisms for information sharing that keep nurses and families aware of consultation requests, delivery, and outcomes without increasing the risk of mixed messages. Public Library of Science 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6459595/ /pubmed/30973891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214918 Text en © 2019 Roche et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roche, Stephanie D.
Reichheld, Alyse M.
Demosthenes, Nicholas
Johansson, Anna C.
Howell, Michael D.
Cocchi, Michael N.
Landon, Bruce E.
Stevens, Jennifer P.
Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title_full Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title_fullStr Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title_short Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication
title_sort measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: nursing and family experiences of communication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214918
work_keys_str_mv AT rochestephanied measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT reichheldalysem measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT demosthenesnicholas measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT johanssonannac measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT howellmichaeld measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT cocchimichaeln measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT landonbrucee measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication
AT stevensjenniferp measuringthequalityofinpatientspecialistconsultationintheintensivecareunitnursingandfamilyexperiencesofcommunication