Cargando…

Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Adequate epileptic seizure detection may have the potential to minimize seizure-related complications and improve treatment evaluation. Autonomic changes often precede ictal electroencephalographic discharges and therefore provide a promising tool for timely seizure detection. We reviewed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Westrhenen, Anouk, De Cooman, Thomas, Lazeron, Richard H. C., Van Huffel, Sabine, Thijs, Roland D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0568-1
_version_ 1783410223611904000
author van Westrhenen, Anouk
De Cooman, Thomas
Lazeron, Richard H. C.
Van Huffel, Sabine
Thijs, Roland D.
author_facet van Westrhenen, Anouk
De Cooman, Thomas
Lazeron, Richard H. C.
Van Huffel, Sabine
Thijs, Roland D.
author_sort van Westrhenen, Anouk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adequate epileptic seizure detection may have the potential to minimize seizure-related complications and improve treatment evaluation. Autonomic changes often precede ictal electroencephalographic discharges and therefore provide a promising tool for timely seizure detection. We reviewed the literature for seizure detection algorithms using autonomic nervous system parameters. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for original human studies that validate an algorithm for automatic seizure detection based on autonomic function alterations. Studies on neonates only and pilot studies without performance data were excluded. Algorithm performance was compared for studies with a similar design (retrospective vs. prospective) reporting both sensitivity and false alarm rate (FAR). Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and recently reported quality standards on reporting seizure detection algorithms. RESULTS: Twenty-one out of 638 studies were included in the analysis. Fifteen studies presented a single-modality algorithm based on heart rate variability (n = 10), heart rate (n = 4), or QRS morphology (n = 1), while six studies assessed multimodal algorithms using various combinations of HR, corrected QT interval, oxygen saturation, electrodermal activity, and accelerometry. Most studies had small sample sizes and a short follow-up period. Only two studies performed a prospective validation. A tendency for a lower FAR was found for retrospectively validated algorithms using multimodal autonomic parameters compared to those using single modalities (mean sensitivity per participant 71–100% vs. 64–96%, and mean FAR per participant 0.0–2.4/h vs. 0.7–5.4/h). CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of studies on seizure detection using autonomic parameters is low. Unimodal autonomic algorithms cannot reach acceptable performance as false alarm rates are still too high. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate multimodal automatic seizure detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10286-018-0568-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64597952019-05-03 Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review van Westrhenen, Anouk De Cooman, Thomas Lazeron, Richard H. C. Van Huffel, Sabine Thijs, Roland D. Clin Auton Res Review Article PURPOSE: Adequate epileptic seizure detection may have the potential to minimize seizure-related complications and improve treatment evaluation. Autonomic changes often precede ictal electroencephalographic discharges and therefore provide a promising tool for timely seizure detection. We reviewed the literature for seizure detection algorithms using autonomic nervous system parameters. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for original human studies that validate an algorithm for automatic seizure detection based on autonomic function alterations. Studies on neonates only and pilot studies without performance data were excluded. Algorithm performance was compared for studies with a similar design (retrospective vs. prospective) reporting both sensitivity and false alarm rate (FAR). Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and recently reported quality standards on reporting seizure detection algorithms. RESULTS: Twenty-one out of 638 studies were included in the analysis. Fifteen studies presented a single-modality algorithm based on heart rate variability (n = 10), heart rate (n = 4), or QRS morphology (n = 1), while six studies assessed multimodal algorithms using various combinations of HR, corrected QT interval, oxygen saturation, electrodermal activity, and accelerometry. Most studies had small sample sizes and a short follow-up period. Only two studies performed a prospective validation. A tendency for a lower FAR was found for retrospectively validated algorithms using multimodal autonomic parameters compared to those using single modalities (mean sensitivity per participant 71–100% vs. 64–96%, and mean FAR per participant 0.0–2.4/h vs. 0.7–5.4/h). CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of studies on seizure detection using autonomic parameters is low. Unimodal autonomic algorithms cannot reach acceptable performance as false alarm rates are still too high. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate multimodal automatic seizure detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10286-018-0568-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6459795/ /pubmed/30377843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0568-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
van Westrhenen, Anouk
De Cooman, Thomas
Lazeron, Richard H. C.
Van Huffel, Sabine
Thijs, Roland D.
Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title_full Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title_fullStr Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title_short Ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
title_sort ictal autonomic changes as a tool for seizure detection: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0568-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwestrhenenanouk ictalautonomicchangesasatoolforseizuredetectionasystematicreview
AT decoomanthomas ictalautonomicchangesasatoolforseizuredetectionasystematicreview
AT lazeronrichardhc ictalautonomicchangesasatoolforseizuredetectionasystematicreview
AT vanhuffelsabine ictalautonomicchangesasatoolforseizuredetectionasystematicreview
AT thijsrolandd ictalautonomicchangesasatoolforseizuredetectionasystematicreview