Cargando…
Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae
INTRODUCTION: The brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens Stål, Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the most devastating insect pests of the crucially important cereal crop, rice (Oryza sativa L.). Currently, multiple BPH-resistant rice varieties have been cultivated and generalized to control BPH....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4 |
_version_ | 1783410224777920512 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Kui Yue, Lei Xia, Xin Liu, Kai Zhang, Wenqing |
author_facet | Kang, Kui Yue, Lei Xia, Xin Liu, Kai Zhang, Wenqing |
author_sort | Kang, Kui |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens Stål, Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the most devastating insect pests of the crucially important cereal crop, rice (Oryza sativa L.). Currently, multiple BPH-resistant rice varieties have been cultivated and generalized to control BPH. However, the defence metabolic responses and their modes of action against BPH in different rice cultivars remain uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: We used a non-biased metabolomics approach to explore the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in the susceptible TN1 rice cultivar and two resistant cultivars (IR36 and IR56). METHODS: The metabolomic detection based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) was performed to investigate the content changes of identified metabolites in TN1, IR36 and IR56 rice varieties at various time points (0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 96 h) post BPH feeding. The differentially expressed metabolites were screened and the corresponding metabolic pathways were further enriched. RESULTS: The results showed that compared to that in TN1, the content changes of most primary metabolites were more stable, but the concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolites were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56. Furthermore, the differentially expressed pathways analysis revealed that cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolism was persistently induced in IR36, but changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism were more significant in IR56 during BPH infestation. Besides, the contents of quercetin and spermidine which were harmful to BPH fitness, were significantly elevated by BPH in TN1 and IR36, and the quercetin level was significantly decreased during BPH feeding in IR56. CONCLUSION: The results of the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in different rice cultivars were useful to clarify the metabolic mechanism of rice plants during BPH infestation and to provide new resources to control this insect pest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6459800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64598002019-05-03 Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae Kang, Kui Yue, Lei Xia, Xin Liu, Kai Zhang, Wenqing Metabolomics Original Article INTRODUCTION: The brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens Stål, Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the most devastating insect pests of the crucially important cereal crop, rice (Oryza sativa L.). Currently, multiple BPH-resistant rice varieties have been cultivated and generalized to control BPH. However, the defence metabolic responses and their modes of action against BPH in different rice cultivars remain uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: We used a non-biased metabolomics approach to explore the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in the susceptible TN1 rice cultivar and two resistant cultivars (IR36 and IR56). METHODS: The metabolomic detection based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) was performed to investigate the content changes of identified metabolites in TN1, IR36 and IR56 rice varieties at various time points (0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 96 h) post BPH feeding. The differentially expressed metabolites were screened and the corresponding metabolic pathways were further enriched. RESULTS: The results showed that compared to that in TN1, the content changes of most primary metabolites were more stable, but the concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolites were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56. Furthermore, the differentially expressed pathways analysis revealed that cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolism was persistently induced in IR36, but changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism were more significant in IR56 during BPH infestation. Besides, the contents of quercetin and spermidine which were harmful to BPH fitness, were significantly elevated by BPH in TN1 and IR36, and the quercetin level was significantly decreased during BPH feeding in IR56. CONCLUSION: The results of the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in different rice cultivars were useful to clarify the metabolic mechanism of rice plants during BPH infestation and to provide new resources to control this insect pest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-04-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6459800/ /pubmed/30976994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kang, Kui Yue, Lei Xia, Xin Liu, Kai Zhang, Wenqing Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title | Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title_full | Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title_fullStr | Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title_short | Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae |
title_sort | comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper nilaparvata lugens hemiptera: delphacidae |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangkui comparativemetabolomicsanalysisofdifferentresistantricevarietiesinresponsetothebrownplanthoppernilaparvatalugenshemipteradelphacidae AT yuelei comparativemetabolomicsanalysisofdifferentresistantricevarietiesinresponsetothebrownplanthoppernilaparvatalugenshemipteradelphacidae AT xiaxin comparativemetabolomicsanalysisofdifferentresistantricevarietiesinresponsetothebrownplanthoppernilaparvatalugenshemipteradelphacidae AT liukai comparativemetabolomicsanalysisofdifferentresistantricevarietiesinresponsetothebrownplanthoppernilaparvatalugenshemipteradelphacidae AT zhangwenqing comparativemetabolomicsanalysisofdifferentresistantricevarietiesinresponsetothebrownplanthoppernilaparvatalugenshemipteradelphacidae |