Cargando…

Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications

BACKGROUND: Myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping are promising techniques for quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial pathologies; however, due to conflicting data regarding normal values, routine clinical implementation of this method is still challenging. METHODS: To evaluate this situation d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granitz, Marcel, Motloch, Lukas J., Granitz, Christina, Meissnitzer, Matthias, Hitzl, Wolfgang, Hergan, Klaus, Schlattau, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3
_version_ 1783410225027481600
author Granitz, Marcel
Motloch, Lukas J.
Granitz, Christina
Meissnitzer, Matthias
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Hergan, Klaus
Schlattau, Alexander
author_facet Granitz, Marcel
Motloch, Lukas J.
Granitz, Christina
Meissnitzer, Matthias
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Hergan, Klaus
Schlattau, Alexander
author_sort Granitz, Marcel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping are promising techniques for quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial pathologies; however, due to conflicting data regarding normal values, routine clinical implementation of this method is still challenging. METHODS: To evaluate this situation during daily clinical practice the characteristics of normal values obtained in 60 healthy volunteers who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on 1.5T and 3T scanners were studied. The T1 modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI; 5(3)3; modified for higher heart rates) and T2 navigator gated black-blood prepared gradient-spin-echo (GraSE) sequences were used. RESULTS: While age and body mass index did not affect relaxation times, a gender and heart rate dependency was found showing higher T1 and T2 values in females, whereas at higher heart rates a prolongation of T1 and a shortening of T2 relaxation times was found. Particularly prone to artifacts were T2 measurements at 3T and the inferolateral wall. In the individual setting mean relaxation times for T1 were 995.8 ± 30.9 ms at 1.5T and 1183.8 ± 37.5 ms at 3T and 55.8 ± 2.8 ms at 1.5T and 51.6 ± 3 ms at 3T for T2 indicating a high dependency of reference values on MRI protocol when compared to the literature. Furthermore, as presumed mean T1 and T2 values correlated in the same individual. CONCLUSIONS: The T1 and T2 relaxation times depend on physiological factors and especially on MRI protocols. Therefore, reference values should be validated individually in every radiological institution before implementing mapping protocols in daily clinical practice. Correlation of mean T1 and T2 values in the same proband at both field strengths indicates intraindividual reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6459801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64598012019-05-03 Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications Granitz, Marcel Motloch, Lukas J. Granitz, Christina Meissnitzer, Matthias Hitzl, Wolfgang Hergan, Klaus Schlattau, Alexander Wien Klin Wochenschr Original Article BACKGROUND: Myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping are promising techniques for quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial pathologies; however, due to conflicting data regarding normal values, routine clinical implementation of this method is still challenging. METHODS: To evaluate this situation during daily clinical practice the characteristics of normal values obtained in 60 healthy volunteers who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on 1.5T and 3T scanners were studied. The T1 modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI; 5(3)3; modified for higher heart rates) and T2 navigator gated black-blood prepared gradient-spin-echo (GraSE) sequences were used. RESULTS: While age and body mass index did not affect relaxation times, a gender and heart rate dependency was found showing higher T1 and T2 values in females, whereas at higher heart rates a prolongation of T1 and a shortening of T2 relaxation times was found. Particularly prone to artifacts were T2 measurements at 3T and the inferolateral wall. In the individual setting mean relaxation times for T1 were 995.8 ± 30.9 ms at 1.5T and 1183.8 ± 37.5 ms at 3T and 55.8 ± 2.8 ms at 1.5T and 51.6 ± 3 ms at 3T for T2 indicating a high dependency of reference values on MRI protocol when compared to the literature. Furthermore, as presumed mean T1 and T2 values correlated in the same individual. CONCLUSIONS: The T1 and T2 relaxation times depend on physiological factors and especially on MRI protocols. Therefore, reference values should be validated individually in every radiological institution before implementing mapping protocols in daily clinical practice. Correlation of mean T1 and T2 values in the same proband at both field strengths indicates intraindividual reproducibility. Springer Vienna 2018-12-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6459801/ /pubmed/30519737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Granitz, Marcel
Motloch, Lukas J.
Granitz, Christina
Meissnitzer, Matthias
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Hergan, Klaus
Schlattau, Alexander
Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title_full Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title_fullStr Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title_short Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: Reference values and clinical implications
title_sort comparison of native myocardial t1 and t2 mapping at 1.5t and 3t in healthy volunteers: reference values and clinical implications
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6459801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3
work_keys_str_mv AT granitzmarcel comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT motlochlukasj comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT granitzchristina comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT meissnitzermatthias comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT hitzlwolfgang comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT herganklaus comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications
AT schlattaualexander comparisonofnativemyocardialt1andt2mappingat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteersreferencevaluesandclinicalimplications