Cargando…

A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines

PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small abs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Christine, Hirji, Sitara, Onishi, Maika, Ha, Richard, Taback, Bret, Horowitz, David P., Connolly, Eileen P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004
_version_ 1783410281208086528
author Chin, Christine
Hirji, Sitara
Onishi, Maika
Ha, Richard
Taback, Bret
Horowitz, David P.
Connolly, Eileen P.
author_facet Chin, Christine
Hirji, Sitara
Onishi, Maika
Ha, Richard
Taback, Bret
Horowitz, David P.
Connolly, Eileen P.
author_sort Chin, Christine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small absolute benefit in local control with standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We examine how the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) APBI consensus guidelines (CG) may be applied to the preoperative selection of patients with DCIS for IORT and determine treatment outcomes by CG group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS enrolled in an institutional prospective registry IORT database using the Zeiss Intrabeam(®) device between September 2013 and February 2017. Based on available preoperative clinicopathologic information, patients were deemed suitable, cautionary, or unsuitable for IORT according to the ASTRO CG. Change in CG group based on final pathologic diagnosis was determined, and additional therapy was recommended for unsuitable patients. Outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was determined. RESULTS: A total of 61 DCIS lesions in 60 patients were treated with IORT. Preoperatively, 21 patients (35%) were suitable and 36 (59%) were cautionary. Four (6%) were unsuitable because of lesion size but declined WBI. Final pathologic diagnosis changed the CG grouping of 10 patients (16%) because of either occult high-grade disease in 2 (3%) or close/positive margins in 8 (13%). Ultimately 12 patients total were considered unsuitable, of whom 8 (66%) accepted additional WBI after IORT. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was identified among 2 suitable, 1 cautionary, and no unsuitable patients. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is necessary to refine selection of patients with DCIS who may be optimally treated with IORT alone. High acceptance of additional therapy among unsuitable patients resulted in excellent outcomes. The use of biomarkers in addition to traditional clinical and pathologic factors may help to better select patients for IORT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64600972019-04-22 A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines Chin, Christine Hirji, Sitara Onishi, Maika Ha, Richard Taback, Bret Horowitz, David P. Connolly, Eileen P. Adv Radiat Oncol Breast Cancer PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small absolute benefit in local control with standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We examine how the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) APBI consensus guidelines (CG) may be applied to the preoperative selection of patients with DCIS for IORT and determine treatment outcomes by CG group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS enrolled in an institutional prospective registry IORT database using the Zeiss Intrabeam(®) device between September 2013 and February 2017. Based on available preoperative clinicopathologic information, patients were deemed suitable, cautionary, or unsuitable for IORT according to the ASTRO CG. Change in CG group based on final pathologic diagnosis was determined, and additional therapy was recommended for unsuitable patients. Outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was determined. RESULTS: A total of 61 DCIS lesions in 60 patients were treated with IORT. Preoperatively, 21 patients (35%) were suitable and 36 (59%) were cautionary. Four (6%) were unsuitable because of lesion size but declined WBI. Final pathologic diagnosis changed the CG grouping of 10 patients (16%) because of either occult high-grade disease in 2 (3%) or close/positive margins in 8 (13%). Ultimately 12 patients total were considered unsuitable, of whom 8 (66%) accepted additional WBI after IORT. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was identified among 2 suitable, 1 cautionary, and no unsuitable patients. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is necessary to refine selection of patients with DCIS who may be optimally treated with IORT alone. High acceptance of additional therapy among unsuitable patients resulted in excellent outcomes. The use of biomarkers in addition to traditional clinical and pathologic factors may help to better select patients for IORT. Elsevier 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6460097/ /pubmed/31011670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Breast Cancer
Chin, Christine
Hirji, Sitara
Onishi, Maika
Ha, Richard
Taback, Bret
Horowitz, David P.
Connolly, Eileen P.
A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title_full A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title_fullStr A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title_short A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
title_sort single-institution experience in the preoperative selection of dcis patients for iort using the astro consensus guidelines
topic Breast Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004
work_keys_str_mv AT chinchristine asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT hirjisitara asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT onishimaika asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT harichard asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT tabackbret asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT horowitzdavidp asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT connollyeileenp asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT chinchristine singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT hirjisitara singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT onishimaika singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT harichard singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT tabackbret singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT horowitzdavidp singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines
AT connollyeileenp singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines