Cargando…
A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines
PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small abs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004 |
_version_ | 1783410281208086528 |
---|---|
author | Chin, Christine Hirji, Sitara Onishi, Maika Ha, Richard Taback, Bret Horowitz, David P. Connolly, Eileen P. |
author_facet | Chin, Christine Hirji, Sitara Onishi, Maika Ha, Richard Taback, Bret Horowitz, David P. Connolly, Eileen P. |
author_sort | Chin, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small absolute benefit in local control with standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We examine how the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) APBI consensus guidelines (CG) may be applied to the preoperative selection of patients with DCIS for IORT and determine treatment outcomes by CG group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS enrolled in an institutional prospective registry IORT database using the Zeiss Intrabeam(®) device between September 2013 and February 2017. Based on available preoperative clinicopathologic information, patients were deemed suitable, cautionary, or unsuitable for IORT according to the ASTRO CG. Change in CG group based on final pathologic diagnosis was determined, and additional therapy was recommended for unsuitable patients. Outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was determined. RESULTS: A total of 61 DCIS lesions in 60 patients were treated with IORT. Preoperatively, 21 patients (35%) were suitable and 36 (59%) were cautionary. Four (6%) were unsuitable because of lesion size but declined WBI. Final pathologic diagnosis changed the CG grouping of 10 patients (16%) because of either occult high-grade disease in 2 (3%) or close/positive margins in 8 (13%). Ultimately 12 patients total were considered unsuitable, of whom 8 (66%) accepted additional WBI after IORT. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was identified among 2 suitable, 1 cautionary, and no unsuitable patients. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is necessary to refine selection of patients with DCIS who may be optimally treated with IORT alone. High acceptance of additional therapy among unsuitable patients resulted in excellent outcomes. The use of biomarkers in addition to traditional clinical and pathologic factors may help to better select patients for IORT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6460097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64600972019-04-22 A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines Chin, Christine Hirji, Sitara Onishi, Maika Ha, Richard Taback, Bret Horowitz, David P. Connolly, Eileen P. Adv Radiat Oncol Breast Cancer PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small absolute benefit in local control with standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We examine how the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) APBI consensus guidelines (CG) may be applied to the preoperative selection of patients with DCIS for IORT and determine treatment outcomes by CG group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS enrolled in an institutional prospective registry IORT database using the Zeiss Intrabeam(®) device between September 2013 and February 2017. Based on available preoperative clinicopathologic information, patients were deemed suitable, cautionary, or unsuitable for IORT according to the ASTRO CG. Change in CG group based on final pathologic diagnosis was determined, and additional therapy was recommended for unsuitable patients. Outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was determined. RESULTS: A total of 61 DCIS lesions in 60 patients were treated with IORT. Preoperatively, 21 patients (35%) were suitable and 36 (59%) were cautionary. Four (6%) were unsuitable because of lesion size but declined WBI. Final pathologic diagnosis changed the CG grouping of 10 patients (16%) because of either occult high-grade disease in 2 (3%) or close/positive margins in 8 (13%). Ultimately 12 patients total were considered unsuitable, of whom 8 (66%) accepted additional WBI after IORT. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was identified among 2 suitable, 1 cautionary, and no unsuitable patients. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is necessary to refine selection of patients with DCIS who may be optimally treated with IORT alone. High acceptance of additional therapy among unsuitable patients resulted in excellent outcomes. The use of biomarkers in addition to traditional clinical and pathologic factors may help to better select patients for IORT. Elsevier 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6460097/ /pubmed/31011670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Breast Cancer Chin, Christine Hirji, Sitara Onishi, Maika Ha, Richard Taback, Bret Horowitz, David P. Connolly, Eileen P. A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title | A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title_full | A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title_fullStr | A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title_short | A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines |
title_sort | single-institution experience in the preoperative selection of dcis patients for iort using the astro consensus guidelines |
topic | Breast Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.11.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chinchristine asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT hirjisitara asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT onishimaika asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT harichard asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT tabackbret asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT horowitzdavidp asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT connollyeileenp asingleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT chinchristine singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT hirjisitara singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT onishimaika singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT harichard singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT tabackbret singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT horowitzdavidp singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines AT connollyeileenp singleinstitutionexperienceinthepreoperativeselectionofdcispatientsforiortusingtheastroconsensusguidelines |