Cargando…

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging

PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) adds functional information to morphological magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in the assessment of the brachial nerve plexus. To determine the most appropriate pulse sequence in scan times suited for diagnostic imaging in clinical routine, we compared imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Michael J., Ciritsis, Alexander, Manoliu, Andrei, Stieltjes, Bram, Marcon, Magda, Andreisek, Gustav, Kuhn, Felix Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416178
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0004
_version_ 1783410286811676672
author Ho, Michael J.
Ciritsis, Alexander
Manoliu, Andrei
Stieltjes, Bram
Marcon, Magda
Andreisek, Gustav
Kuhn, Felix Pierre
author_facet Ho, Michael J.
Ciritsis, Alexander
Manoliu, Andrei
Stieltjes, Bram
Marcon, Magda
Andreisek, Gustav
Kuhn, Felix Pierre
author_sort Ho, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) adds functional information to morphological magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in the assessment of the brachial nerve plexus. To determine the most appropriate pulse sequence in scan times suited for diagnostic imaging in clinical routine, we compared image quality between simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented (rs-DTI) and conventional single-shot (ss-DTI) echo-planar imaging techniques. METHODS: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study including 10 healthy volunteers. The supraclavicular brachial plexus, covering the nerve roots and trunks from C5 to C7, was imaged on both sides with rs-DTI and ss-DTI. Both sequences were acquired in scan times <7 min with b-values of 900 s/mm(2) and with isotropic spatial resolution. RESULTS: In rs-DTI image, the overall quality was significantly better and distortion artifacts were significantly lower (P = 0.001–0.002 and P = 0.001–0.002, respectively) for both readers. In ss-DTI, a trend toward lower degree of ghosting and motion artifacts was elicited (reader 1, P = 0.121; reader 2, P = 0.264). No significant differences between the two DTI techniques were found for signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and fractional anisotropy (FA) (P ≥ 0.475, P ≥ 0.624, and P ≥ 0.169, respectively). Interreader agreement for all examined parameters and all sequences ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.064 to 0.905 and Kappa 0.40 to 0.851. CONCLUSION: Incomparable acquisition times rs-DTI showed higher image quality and less distortion artifacts than ss-DTI. The trend toward a higher degree of ghosting and motion artifacts in rs-DTI did not deteriorate image quality to a significant degree. Thus, rs-DTI should be considered for functional MRN of the brachial plexus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64601222019-04-15 Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging Ho, Michael J. Ciritsis, Alexander Manoliu, Andrei Stieltjes, Bram Marcon, Magda Andreisek, Gustav Kuhn, Felix Pierre Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) adds functional information to morphological magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in the assessment of the brachial nerve plexus. To determine the most appropriate pulse sequence in scan times suited for diagnostic imaging in clinical routine, we compared image quality between simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented (rs-DTI) and conventional single-shot (ss-DTI) echo-planar imaging techniques. METHODS: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study including 10 healthy volunteers. The supraclavicular brachial plexus, covering the nerve roots and trunks from C5 to C7, was imaged on both sides with rs-DTI and ss-DTI. Both sequences were acquired in scan times <7 min with b-values of 900 s/mm(2) and with isotropic spatial resolution. RESULTS: In rs-DTI image, the overall quality was significantly better and distortion artifacts were significantly lower (P = 0.001–0.002 and P = 0.001–0.002, respectively) for both readers. In ss-DTI, a trend toward lower degree of ghosting and motion artifacts was elicited (reader 1, P = 0.121; reader 2, P = 0.264). No significant differences between the two DTI techniques were found for signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and fractional anisotropy (FA) (P ≥ 0.475, P ≥ 0.624, and P ≥ 0.169, respectively). Interreader agreement for all examined parameters and all sequences ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.064 to 0.905 and Kappa 0.40 to 0.851. CONCLUSION: Incomparable acquisition times rs-DTI showed higher image quality and less distortion artifacts than ss-DTI. The trend toward a higher degree of ghosting and motion artifacts in rs-DTI did not deteriorate image quality to a significant degree. Thus, rs-DTI should be considered for functional MRN of the brachial plexus. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6460122/ /pubmed/30416178 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0004 Text en © 2018 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Major Paper
Ho, Michael J.
Ciritsis, Alexander
Manoliu, Andrei
Stieltjes, Bram
Marcon, Magda
Andreisek, Gustav
Kuhn, Felix Pierre
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title_full Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title_fullStr Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title_short Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
title_sort diffusion tensor imaging of the brachial plexus: a comparison between readout-segmented and conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416178
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT homichaelj diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT ciritsisalexander diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT manoliuandrei diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT stieltjesbram diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT marconmagda diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT andreisekgustav diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging
AT kuhnfelixpierre diffusiontensorimagingofthebrachialplexusacomparisonbetweenreadoutsegmentedandconventionalsingleshotechoplanarimaging