Cargando…

Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Chen, Han, Xiulan, Wang, Jie, Yuan, Zheng, Wang, Tao, Zhao, Mingdong, Han, Guowei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30764684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428
_version_ 1783410351694413824
author Yang, Chen
Han, Xiulan
Wang, Jie
Yuan, Zheng
Wang, Tao
Zhao, Mingdong
Han, Guowei
author_facet Yang, Chen
Han, Xiulan
Wang, Jie
Yuan, Zheng
Wang, Tao
Zhao, Mingdong
Han, Guowei
author_sort Yang, Chen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE THAs at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All consecutive procedures were managed by high-volume surgeons, using UN or CE THA approaches. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, and yearly thereafter. Patient-related functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Primary and secondary endpoints were early revision (<5 years) and functional outcome. RESULTS: In total, 496 primary unilateral THAs (CE, n = 184; UN, n = 182) were assessed with a median follow-up period of 75 months (range, 65–86 months). From 3 months after surgery to the final follow-up, HHS was consistently superior in the CE group. Respective prosthetic loosening rates in the UN and CE groups were 26.4% and 16.8% at a minimum of 5 years. There was a significant difference in rate of early revision (7.6% CE vs. 14.8% UN). CONCLUSION: Compared with UN THA, CE THA exhibits a superior outcome in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64606042019-04-19 Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up Yang, Chen Han, Xiulan Wang, Jie Yuan, Zheng Wang, Tao Zhao, Mingdong Han, Guowei J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: To compare medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary unilateral uncemented (UN) or cemented (CE) femoral component total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who underwent primary unilateral UN or CE THAs at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All consecutive procedures were managed by high-volume surgeons, using UN or CE THA approaches. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, and yearly thereafter. Patient-related functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Primary and secondary endpoints were early revision (<5 years) and functional outcome. RESULTS: In total, 496 primary unilateral THAs (CE, n = 184; UN, n = 182) were assessed with a median follow-up period of 75 months (range, 65–86 months). From 3 months after surgery to the final follow-up, HHS was consistently superior in the CE group. Respective prosthetic loosening rates in the UN and CE groups were 26.4% and 16.8% at a minimum of 5 years. There was a significant difference in rate of early revision (7.6% CE vs. 14.8% UN). CONCLUSION: Compared with UN THA, CE THA exhibits a superior outcome in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis. SAGE Publications 2019-02-14 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6460604/ /pubmed/30764684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research Reports
Yang, Chen
Han, Xiulan
Wang, Jie
Yuan, Zheng
Wang, Tao
Zhao, Mingdong
Han, Guowei
Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_full Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_fullStr Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_short Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
title_sort cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
topic Clinical Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30764684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518825428
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchen cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT hanxiulan cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT wangjie cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT yuanzheng cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT wangtao cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT zhaomingdong cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup
AT hanguowei cementedversusuncementedfemoralcomponenttotalhiparthroplastyinelderlypatientswithprimaryosteoporosisretrospectiveanalysiswith5yearfollowup