Cargando…

Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity

BACKGROUND: The hand hygiene (HH) behaviour of the general public and its effect on illnesses are issues of growing importance. Gender is associated with HH behaviour. HH efficiency is a combination of washing efficiency and hand drying, but information about the knowledge level and HH behaviour of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suen, Lorna K. P., So, Zoe Y. Y., Yeung, Simon K. W., Lo, Kiki Y. K., Lam, Simon C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6705-5
_version_ 1783410370879160320
author Suen, Lorna K. P.
So, Zoe Y. Y.
Yeung, Simon K. W.
Lo, Kiki Y. K.
Lam, Simon C.
author_facet Suen, Lorna K. P.
So, Zoe Y. Y.
Yeung, Simon K. W.
Lo, Kiki Y. K.
Lam, Simon C.
author_sort Suen, Lorna K. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hand hygiene (HH) behaviour of the general public and its effect on illnesses are issues of growing importance. Gender is associated with HH behaviour. HH efficiency is a combination of washing efficiency and hand drying, but information about the knowledge level and HH behaviour of the general public is relatively limited. The findings of this cross-sectional study can substantially contribute to the understanding on the knowledge gap and public behaviour towards HH, thereby providing information on gender-specific health promotion activities and campaigns to improve HH compliance. METHODS: An epidemiological investigation by using a cross-sectional study design on the general public was conducted either via an online platform (SurveyMonkey) or paper-and-pen methods. The hand-washing and -drying questionnaire was used for data collection. RESULTS: A total of 815 valid questionnaires were collected. Majority of the respondents can differentiate the diseases that can or cannot be transmitted with poor HH, but the HH knowledge of the respondents was relatively inadequate. The female respondents had a significantly better HH knowledge than male respondents. The multiple regression analysis results also indicated that females had a significantly higher knowledge score by 0.288 towards HH than males after adjusting for age and education level. Although the majority of the respondents indicated that they performed hand cleaning under different specific situations, they admitted only using water instead of washing their hands with soap. More males than females dried their hands on their own clothing, whereas more females dried their hands through air evaporation. The average time of using warm hand dryers was generally inadequate amongst the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Being a female, middle-aged and having tertiary education level are protective factors to improve HH knowledge. Misconceptions related to the concepts associated with HH were noted amongst the public. Self-reported practice on hand drying methods indicated that additional education was needed. The findings of this study can provide information on gender-specific health promotion activities and creative campaigns to achieve sustained improvement in HH practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64607272019-05-01 Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity Suen, Lorna K. P. So, Zoe Y. Y. Yeung, Simon K. W. Lo, Kiki Y. K. Lam, Simon C. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The hand hygiene (HH) behaviour of the general public and its effect on illnesses are issues of growing importance. Gender is associated with HH behaviour. HH efficiency is a combination of washing efficiency and hand drying, but information about the knowledge level and HH behaviour of the general public is relatively limited. The findings of this cross-sectional study can substantially contribute to the understanding on the knowledge gap and public behaviour towards HH, thereby providing information on gender-specific health promotion activities and campaigns to improve HH compliance. METHODS: An epidemiological investigation by using a cross-sectional study design on the general public was conducted either via an online platform (SurveyMonkey) or paper-and-pen methods. The hand-washing and -drying questionnaire was used for data collection. RESULTS: A total of 815 valid questionnaires were collected. Majority of the respondents can differentiate the diseases that can or cannot be transmitted with poor HH, but the HH knowledge of the respondents was relatively inadequate. The female respondents had a significantly better HH knowledge than male respondents. The multiple regression analysis results also indicated that females had a significantly higher knowledge score by 0.288 towards HH than males after adjusting for age and education level. Although the majority of the respondents indicated that they performed hand cleaning under different specific situations, they admitted only using water instead of washing their hands with soap. More males than females dried their hands on their own clothing, whereas more females dried their hands through air evaporation. The average time of using warm hand dryers was generally inadequate amongst the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Being a female, middle-aged and having tertiary education level are protective factors to improve HH knowledge. Misconceptions related to the concepts associated with HH were noted amongst the public. Self-reported practice on hand drying methods indicated that additional education was needed. The findings of this study can provide information on gender-specific health promotion activities and creative campaigns to achieve sustained improvement in HH practices. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6460727/ /pubmed/30975130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6705-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suen, Lorna K. P.
So, Zoe Y. Y.
Yeung, Simon K. W.
Lo, Kiki Y. K.
Lam, Simon C.
Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title_full Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title_fullStr Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title_short Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
title_sort epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study on gender disparity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6705-5
work_keys_str_mv AT suenlornakp epidemiologicalinvestigationonhandhygieneknowledgeandbehaviouracrosssectionalstudyongenderdisparity
AT sozoeyy epidemiologicalinvestigationonhandhygieneknowledgeandbehaviouracrosssectionalstudyongenderdisparity
AT yeungsimonkw epidemiologicalinvestigationonhandhygieneknowledgeandbehaviouracrosssectionalstudyongenderdisparity
AT lokikiyk epidemiologicalinvestigationonhandhygieneknowledgeandbehaviouracrosssectionalstudyongenderdisparity
AT lamsimonc epidemiologicalinvestigationonhandhygieneknowledgeandbehaviouracrosssectionalstudyongenderdisparity