Cargando…
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies
In orthopedic literature, there is little consensus regarding the best management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Controversies and disparate trends derive from differences in clinical presentation, various classifications, and a variety of surgical procedures that have been described....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040725 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S166735 |
_version_ | 1783410387952074752 |
---|---|
author | Aprato, Alessandro Conti, Andrea Bertolo, Federico Massè, Alessandro |
author_facet | Aprato, Alessandro Conti, Andrea Bertolo, Federico Massè, Alessandro |
author_sort | Aprato, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | In orthopedic literature, there is little consensus regarding the best management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Controversies and disparate trends derive from differences in clinical presentation, various classifications, and a variety of surgical procedures that have been described. Currently, there are no evidence-based recommendations. Surgical procedures vary, and they can be divided into fixation in situ, compensatory osteotomies, and direct corrections of the deformity at the head–neck junction. The first and second group of procedures have so far not gained optimal control over the risk of avascular necrosis or cannot achieve an anatomically aligned epiphysis with normal blood supply. On the other hand, the third technique can achieve this target and prevent residual deformity and the development of early hip arthritis, but it is not widely accepted, because of its surgical complexity. The purpose of this work is to present an overview of current knowledge and provide an orientation on clinical and surgical management of the patient suffering from SCFE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6460813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64608132019-04-30 Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies Aprato, Alessandro Conti, Andrea Bertolo, Federico Massè, Alessandro Orthop Res Rev Review In orthopedic literature, there is little consensus regarding the best management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Controversies and disparate trends derive from differences in clinical presentation, various classifications, and a variety of surgical procedures that have been described. Currently, there are no evidence-based recommendations. Surgical procedures vary, and they can be divided into fixation in situ, compensatory osteotomies, and direct corrections of the deformity at the head–neck junction. The first and second group of procedures have so far not gained optimal control over the risk of avascular necrosis or cannot achieve an anatomically aligned epiphysis with normal blood supply. On the other hand, the third technique can achieve this target and prevent residual deformity and the development of early hip arthritis, but it is not widely accepted, because of its surgical complexity. The purpose of this work is to present an overview of current knowledge and provide an orientation on clinical and surgical management of the patient suffering from SCFE. Dove Medical Press 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6460813/ /pubmed/31040725 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S166735 Text en © 2019 Aprato et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Aprato, Alessandro Conti, Andrea Bertolo, Federico Massè, Alessandro Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title | Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title_full | Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title_fullStr | Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title_short | Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
title_sort | slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040725 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S166735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apratoalessandro slippedcapitalfemoralepiphysiscurrentmanagementstrategies AT contiandrea slippedcapitalfemoralepiphysiscurrentmanagementstrategies AT bertolofederico slippedcapitalfemoralepiphysiscurrentmanagementstrategies AT massealessandro slippedcapitalfemoralepiphysiscurrentmanagementstrategies |