Cargando…

Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children

BACKGROUND: In 2006, artemether–lumefantrine (ALU), specifically Coartem(®) (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland), was approved as the first-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. Due to poor availability and affordability of the innovator’s product, the government of Tanzan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilonzi, Manase, Minzi, Omary, Mutagonda, Ritah, Sasi, Philip, Kamuhabwa, Appolinary, Aklillu, Eleni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2769-z
_version_ 1783410394766770176
author Kilonzi, Manase
Minzi, Omary
Mutagonda, Ritah
Sasi, Philip
Kamuhabwa, Appolinary
Aklillu, Eleni
author_facet Kilonzi, Manase
Minzi, Omary
Mutagonda, Ritah
Sasi, Philip
Kamuhabwa, Appolinary
Aklillu, Eleni
author_sort Kilonzi, Manase
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2006, artemether–lumefantrine (ALU), specifically Coartem(®) (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland), was approved as the first-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. Due to poor availability and affordability of the innovator’s product, the government of Tanzania in 2013 prequalified the use of generic anti-malarial drugs, whereby Artefan(®) (Ajanta, Pharma Ltd, India) was the first to be approved. METHODS: This was an equivalence prospective study that aimed to determine the effectiveness of anti-malarial generic Artefan(®) in comparison with innovator’s product Coartem(®). Patients aged 6 to 59 months with uncomplicated malaria were recruited and randomized to either receive Artefan(®) or Coartem(®) as a control. Participants were required to revisit clinic five times as follow up to monitor treatment outcome as per World Health Organization recommendations. On each visit, thick and thin blood smears, dried blood spot (DBS), haemoglobin concentrations and auxiliary temperature were performed and documented. RESULTS: Out of 230 recruited participants, 200 met inclusion criteria and were randomized equally to receive Artefan(®) and Coartem(®). The overall PCR uncorrected cure rate were 80% for Artefan(®) and 75% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.44). Adequate clinical and parasitological response were 82.1% for Artefan(®) and 74.7% for Coartem(®), and there was no early treatment failure (ETF) observed in both arms of treatment. Both drugs showed excellent early parasite clearance, whereby no participants had peripheral parasitaemia on day 3. Late clinical failures (LCF) were 3.6% for Artefan(®) and 1.3% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.31), and late parasitological failure (LPF) were 15.4% for Artefan(®) and 22.7% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.32). Mean haemoglobin (g/dl) concentrations observed on day 28 were higher compared to day 0 for both drugs, although not statistically significant. Only one (1.3%) participant on Artefan(®) had temperature ≥ 37.5 °C on day 3. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that both Artefan(®) and Coartem(®) are equivalent and effective in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst children in the Coast part of Tanzania.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64608452019-05-01 Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children Kilonzi, Manase Minzi, Omary Mutagonda, Ritah Sasi, Philip Kamuhabwa, Appolinary Aklillu, Eleni Malar J Research BACKGROUND: In 2006, artemether–lumefantrine (ALU), specifically Coartem(®) (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland), was approved as the first-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. Due to poor availability and affordability of the innovator’s product, the government of Tanzania in 2013 prequalified the use of generic anti-malarial drugs, whereby Artefan(®) (Ajanta, Pharma Ltd, India) was the first to be approved. METHODS: This was an equivalence prospective study that aimed to determine the effectiveness of anti-malarial generic Artefan(®) in comparison with innovator’s product Coartem(®). Patients aged 6 to 59 months with uncomplicated malaria were recruited and randomized to either receive Artefan(®) or Coartem(®) as a control. Participants were required to revisit clinic five times as follow up to monitor treatment outcome as per World Health Organization recommendations. On each visit, thick and thin blood smears, dried blood spot (DBS), haemoglobin concentrations and auxiliary temperature were performed and documented. RESULTS: Out of 230 recruited participants, 200 met inclusion criteria and were randomized equally to receive Artefan(®) and Coartem(®). The overall PCR uncorrected cure rate were 80% for Artefan(®) and 75% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.44). Adequate clinical and parasitological response were 82.1% for Artefan(®) and 74.7% for Coartem(®), and there was no early treatment failure (ETF) observed in both arms of treatment. Both drugs showed excellent early parasite clearance, whereby no participants had peripheral parasitaemia on day 3. Late clinical failures (LCF) were 3.6% for Artefan(®) and 1.3% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.31), and late parasitological failure (LPF) were 15.4% for Artefan(®) and 22.7% for Coartem(®) (p = 0.32). Mean haemoglobin (g/dl) concentrations observed on day 28 were higher compared to day 0 for both drugs, although not statistically significant. Only one (1.3%) participant on Artefan(®) had temperature ≥ 37.5 °C on day 3. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that both Artefan(®) and Coartem(®) are equivalent and effective in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst children in the Coast part of Tanzania. BioMed Central 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6460845/ /pubmed/30975147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2769-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kilonzi, Manase
Minzi, Omary
Mutagonda, Ritah
Sasi, Philip
Kamuhabwa, Appolinary
Aklillu, Eleni
Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title_full Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title_fullStr Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title_short Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children
title_sort comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst tanzanian children
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2769-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kilonzimanase comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren
AT minziomary comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren
AT mutagondaritah comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren
AT sasiphilip comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren
AT kamuhabwaappolinary comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren
AT aklillueleni comparisonofmalariatreatmentoutcomeofgenericandinnovatorsantimalarialdrugscontainingartemetherlumefantrinecombinationinthemanagementofuncomplicatedmalariaamongsttanzanianchildren