Cargando…

Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier

In short-term studies, block periodization of high-intensity training (HIT) has been shown to be an effective strategy that enhances performance and related physiological factors. However, long-term studies and detailed investigations of macro, meso, and micro-periodization of HIT blocks in world-cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solli, Guro Strøm, Tønnessen, Espen, Sandbakk, Øyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00375
_version_ 1783410421880848384
author Solli, Guro Strøm
Tønnessen, Espen
Sandbakk, Øyvind
author_facet Solli, Guro Strøm
Tønnessen, Espen
Sandbakk, Øyvind
author_sort Solli, Guro Strøm
collection PubMed
description In short-term studies, block periodization of high-intensity training (HIT) has been shown to be an effective strategy that enhances performance and related physiological factors. However, long-term studies and detailed investigations of macro, meso, and micro-periodization of HIT blocks in world-class endurance athletes are currently lacking. In a recent study, we showed that the world’s most successful cross-country (XC) skier used two different periodization models with success throughout her career. One including extensive use of HIT blocks, namely BP, and one using a traditional method namely TRAD. In this study, we compare BP with TRAD in two comparable successful seasons and provide a detailed description of the annual use of HIT blocks in BP. The participant is the most-decorated winter Olympian, with 8 Olympic gold medals, 18 world championship titles, and 114 world cup victories. Training data was categorized by training form (endurance, strength, and speed), intensity [low (LIT), moderate (MIT), and HIT], and mode (running, cycling, and skiing/roller skiing). No significant difference was found in the total endurance training load between BP and TRAD. However, training volume in BP was lower compared to TRAD (15 ± 6 vs. 18 ± 7 h/wk, P = 0.001), mainly explained by less LIT (13 ± 5 vs. 15 ± 5 h/wk, P = 0.004). Lower volume of MIT was also performed in BP compared to TRAD (13 vs. 38 sessions/year), whereas the amount of HIT was higher in BP (157 vs. 77 sessions/year). While BP included high amounts of HIT already from the first preparation period, followed by a reduction toward the competition period, TRAD had a progressive increase in HIT toward the competition period. In BP, the athlete performed seven HIT blocks, varying from 7 to 11 days, each including 8–13 HIT sessions. This study provides novel insights into successful utilization of two different periodization models in the worlds best XC skier, and illustrates the macro, meso and micro- periodization of HIT blocks to increase the overall amount of HIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6460991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64609912019-04-25 Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier Solli, Guro Strøm Tønnessen, Espen Sandbakk, Øyvind Front Physiol Physiology In short-term studies, block periodization of high-intensity training (HIT) has been shown to be an effective strategy that enhances performance and related physiological factors. However, long-term studies and detailed investigations of macro, meso, and micro-periodization of HIT blocks in world-class endurance athletes are currently lacking. In a recent study, we showed that the world’s most successful cross-country (XC) skier used two different periodization models with success throughout her career. One including extensive use of HIT blocks, namely BP, and one using a traditional method namely TRAD. In this study, we compare BP with TRAD in two comparable successful seasons and provide a detailed description of the annual use of HIT blocks in BP. The participant is the most-decorated winter Olympian, with 8 Olympic gold medals, 18 world championship titles, and 114 world cup victories. Training data was categorized by training form (endurance, strength, and speed), intensity [low (LIT), moderate (MIT), and HIT], and mode (running, cycling, and skiing/roller skiing). No significant difference was found in the total endurance training load between BP and TRAD. However, training volume in BP was lower compared to TRAD (15 ± 6 vs. 18 ± 7 h/wk, P = 0.001), mainly explained by less LIT (13 ± 5 vs. 15 ± 5 h/wk, P = 0.004). Lower volume of MIT was also performed in BP compared to TRAD (13 vs. 38 sessions/year), whereas the amount of HIT was higher in BP (157 vs. 77 sessions/year). While BP included high amounts of HIT already from the first preparation period, followed by a reduction toward the competition period, TRAD had a progressive increase in HIT toward the competition period. In BP, the athlete performed seven HIT blocks, varying from 7 to 11 days, each including 8–13 HIT sessions. This study provides novel insights into successful utilization of two different periodization models in the worlds best XC skier, and illustrates the macro, meso and micro- periodization of HIT blocks to increase the overall amount of HIT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6460991/ /pubmed/31024338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00375 Text en Copyright © 2019 Solli, Tønnessen and Sandbakk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Solli, Guro Strøm
Tønnessen, Espen
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title_full Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title_fullStr Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title_full_unstemmed Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title_short Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World’s Best Cross-Country Skier
title_sort block vs. traditional periodization of hit: two different paths to success for the world’s best cross-country skier
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6460991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00375
work_keys_str_mv AT solligurostrøm blockvstraditionalperiodizationofhittwodifferentpathstosuccessfortheworldsbestcrosscountryskier
AT tønnessenespen blockvstraditionalperiodizationofhittwodifferentpathstosuccessfortheworldsbestcrosscountryskier
AT sandbakkøyvind blockvstraditionalperiodizationofhittwodifferentpathstosuccessfortheworldsbestcrosscountryskier