Cargando…

Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation

BACKGROUND: Arterial blood gases (ABG) are essential for assessment of patients with severe illness, but sampling is difficult in some settings and more painful than for peripheral venous blood gas (VBG). Venous to Arterial Conversion (v-TAC; OBIMedical ApS, Denmark) is a method to calculate ABG val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekström, Magnus, Engblom, Anna, Ilic, Adam, Holthius, Nicholas, Nordström, Peter, Vaara, Ivar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30978246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215413
_version_ 1783410473846177792
author Ekström, Magnus
Engblom, Anna
Ilic, Adam
Holthius, Nicholas
Nordström, Peter
Vaara, Ivar
author_facet Ekström, Magnus
Engblom, Anna
Ilic, Adam
Holthius, Nicholas
Nordström, Peter
Vaara, Ivar
author_sort Ekström, Magnus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arterial blood gases (ABG) are essential for assessment of patients with severe illness, but sampling is difficult in some settings and more painful than for peripheral venous blood gas (VBG). Venous to Arterial Conversion (v-TAC; OBIMedical ApS, Denmark) is a method to calculate ABG values from a VBG and pulse oximetry (SpO(2)). The aim was to validate v-TAC against ABG for measuring pH, carbon dioxide (pCO(2)) and oxygenation (pO(2)). METHODS: Of 103 sample sets, 87 paired ABGs and VBGs with SpO(2) from 46 inpatients eligible for ABG met strict sampling criteria. Agreement was evaluated using mean difference with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: v-TAC had very high agreement with ABG for pH (mean diff((ABG–v-TAC)) -0.001; 95% LoA -0.017 to 0.016), pCO(2) (-0.14 kPa; 95% LoA -0.46 to 0.19) and moderate to high for pO(2) (-0.28 kPa; 95% LoA -1.31 to 0.76). For detecting hypercapnia (PaCO(2)>6.0 kPa), v-TAC had sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.8% and accuracy 97%. The accuracy of v-TAC for detecting hypoxemia (PaO(2)<8.0 kPa) was comparable to that of pulse oximetry. Agreement with ABG was higher for v-TAC than for VBG for all analyses. CONCLUSION: Calculated arterial blood gases (v-TAC) from a venous sample and pulse oximetry were comparable to ABG values and may be useful for evaluation of blood gases in clinical settings. This could reduce the logistic burden of arterial sampling, facilitate improved screening and follow-up and reduce patient pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6461265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64612652019-05-03 Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation Ekström, Magnus Engblom, Anna Ilic, Adam Holthius, Nicholas Nordström, Peter Vaara, Ivar PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Arterial blood gases (ABG) are essential for assessment of patients with severe illness, but sampling is difficult in some settings and more painful than for peripheral venous blood gas (VBG). Venous to Arterial Conversion (v-TAC; OBIMedical ApS, Denmark) is a method to calculate ABG values from a VBG and pulse oximetry (SpO(2)). The aim was to validate v-TAC against ABG for measuring pH, carbon dioxide (pCO(2)) and oxygenation (pO(2)). METHODS: Of 103 sample sets, 87 paired ABGs and VBGs with SpO(2) from 46 inpatients eligible for ABG met strict sampling criteria. Agreement was evaluated using mean difference with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: v-TAC had very high agreement with ABG for pH (mean diff((ABG–v-TAC)) -0.001; 95% LoA -0.017 to 0.016), pCO(2) (-0.14 kPa; 95% LoA -0.46 to 0.19) and moderate to high for pO(2) (-0.28 kPa; 95% LoA -1.31 to 0.76). For detecting hypercapnia (PaCO(2)>6.0 kPa), v-TAC had sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.8% and accuracy 97%. The accuracy of v-TAC for detecting hypoxemia (PaO(2)<8.0 kPa) was comparable to that of pulse oximetry. Agreement with ABG was higher for v-TAC than for VBG for all analyses. CONCLUSION: Calculated arterial blood gases (v-TAC) from a venous sample and pulse oximetry were comparable to ABG values and may be useful for evaluation of blood gases in clinical settings. This could reduce the logistic burden of arterial sampling, facilitate improved screening and follow-up and reduce patient pain. Public Library of Science 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6461265/ /pubmed/30978246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215413 Text en © 2019 Ekström et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ekström, Magnus
Engblom, Anna
Ilic, Adam
Holthius, Nicholas
Nordström, Peter
Vaara, Ivar
Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title_full Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title_fullStr Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title_full_unstemmed Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title_short Calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: Clinical validation
title_sort calculated arterial blood gas values from a venous sample and pulse oximetry: clinical validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30978246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215413
work_keys_str_mv AT ekstrommagnus calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation
AT engblomanna calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation
AT ilicadam calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation
AT holthiusnicholas calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation
AT nordstrompeter calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation
AT vaaraivar calculatedarterialbloodgasvaluesfromavenoussampleandpulseoximetryclinicalvalidation