Cargando…
Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome
Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Ger...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31000884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0774-8617 |
_version_ | 1783410490069745664 |
---|---|
author | Ortiz, Javier U. Hammerl, Thomas Wasmaier, Maria Wienerroither, Valerie Haller, Bernhard Hamann, Moritz Kuschel, Bettina Lobmaier, Silvia M. |
author_facet | Ortiz, Javier U. Hammerl, Thomas Wasmaier, Maria Wienerroither, Valerie Haller, Bernhard Hamann, Moritz Kuschel, Bettina Lobmaier, Silvia M. |
author_sort | Ortiz, Javier U. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Germany are limited. Our goal was to study the influence of these analgesic techniques (opioids vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil vs. epidural analgesia) on the second stage of labour and on perinatal outcome. Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with 254 parturients. The women were divided into 4 groups based on the analgesic technique and matched for parity, maternal age and gestational age (opioids n = 64, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil n = 60, epidural analgesia n = 64, controls without the medicinal products mentioned n = 66). Maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analysed. Results The expulsive stage was prolonged among both primiparas and multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (79 [74] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.016, and 28 [68] vs. 10 [11] min, p < 0.001, respectively) and epidural analgesia (90 [92] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.004, and 22.5 [73] vs. 10 [11] min, p = 0.003, respectively) compared with the controls. The length of the pushing stage was similar among primiparas in all groups but prolonged compared with the controls in multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (15 [17] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.001) and epidural analgesia (10 [15] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.006). The Apgar, umbilical arterial pH and base excess values were similar between the groups, as were the rates of acidosis and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion Parturients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil and epidural analgesia showed a prolonged expulsive stage compared with the opioid group and controls. The short-term neonatal outcome was not influenced by the three methods examined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6461463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64614632019-04-16 Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome Ortiz, Javier U. Hammerl, Thomas Wasmaier, Maria Wienerroither, Valerie Haller, Bernhard Hamann, Moritz Kuschel, Bettina Lobmaier, Silvia M. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Germany are limited. Our goal was to study the influence of these analgesic techniques (opioids vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil vs. epidural analgesia) on the second stage of labour and on perinatal outcome. Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with 254 parturients. The women were divided into 4 groups based on the analgesic technique and matched for parity, maternal age and gestational age (opioids n = 64, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil n = 60, epidural analgesia n = 64, controls without the medicinal products mentioned n = 66). Maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analysed. Results The expulsive stage was prolonged among both primiparas and multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (79 [74] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.016, and 28 [68] vs. 10 [11] min, p < 0.001, respectively) and epidural analgesia (90 [92] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.004, and 22.5 [73] vs. 10 [11] min, p = 0.003, respectively) compared with the controls. The length of the pushing stage was similar among primiparas in all groups but prolonged compared with the controls in multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (15 [17] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.001) and epidural analgesia (10 [15] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.006). The Apgar, umbilical arterial pH and base excess values were similar between the groups, as were the rates of acidosis and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion Parturients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil and epidural analgesia showed a prolonged expulsive stage compared with the opioid group and controls. The short-term neonatal outcome was not influenced by the three methods examined. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-04 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6461463/ /pubmed/31000884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0774-8617 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ortiz, Javier U. Hammerl, Thomas Wasmaier, Maria Wienerroither, Valerie Haller, Bernhard Hamann, Moritz Kuschel, Bettina Lobmaier, Silvia M. Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title | Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title_full | Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title_fullStr | Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title_short | Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome |
title_sort | influence of different methods of intrapartum analgesia on the progress of labour and on perinatal outcome |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31000884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0774-8617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortizjavieru influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT hammerlthomas influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT wasmaiermaria influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT wienerroithervalerie influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT hallerbernhard influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT hamannmoritz influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT kuschelbettina influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome AT lobmaiersilviam influenceofdifferentmethodsofintrapartumanalgesiaontheprogressoflabourandonperinataloutcome |