Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit

Background and study aims  Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Janaki, Fang, John, Taylor, Linda J., Adler, Douglas G., Gawron, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284
_version_ 1783410492851617792
author Patel, Janaki
Fang, John
Taylor, Linda J.
Adler, Douglas G.
Gawron, Andrew J.
author_facet Patel, Janaki
Fang, John
Taylor, Linda J.
Adler, Douglas G.
Gawron, Andrew J.
author_sort Patel, Janaki
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of NAAP sedation in an ICU population. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) performed with NAAP sedation in our intensive care units from June 2014 to September 2016. All EGDs were performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point of this study was to analyze the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs). The secondary end points included successful completion of procedure and any endoscopic interventions performed. Results  Two of 161 procedures (1.2 %) had sedation-related AEs requiring procedure termination. One hundred forty-six of 161 procedures (90.7 %) were successfully completed. Incomplete procedures were due to excess heme, retained food or obstructive lesions (13/161, 8.1 %). Endoscopic intervention was performed successfully in 17/24 cases (70.8 %) that had endoscopically treated lesions identified. One hundred six of 161 patients (66 %) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III or IV. Conclusion  Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that EGDs can be successfully completed in ICU patients using NAAP sedation. When procedures cannot be completed, it is rarely due to sedation-related AEs. NAAP sedation further allows adequate examination and successful treatment of high-risk lesions. NAAP sedation appears safe and effective for endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6461546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64615462019-04-16 Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit Patel, Janaki Fang, John Taylor, Linda J. Adler, Douglas G. Gawron, Andrew J. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of NAAP sedation in an ICU population. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) performed with NAAP sedation in our intensive care units from June 2014 to September 2016. All EGDs were performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point of this study was to analyze the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs). The secondary end points included successful completion of procedure and any endoscopic interventions performed. Results  Two of 161 procedures (1.2 %) had sedation-related AEs requiring procedure termination. One hundred forty-six of 161 procedures (90.7 %) were successfully completed. Incomplete procedures were due to excess heme, retained food or obstructive lesions (13/161, 8.1 %). Endoscopic intervention was performed successfully in 17/24 cases (70.8 %) that had endoscopically treated lesions identified. One hundred six of 161 patients (66 %) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III or IV. Conclusion  Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that EGDs can be successfully completed in ICU patients using NAAP sedation. When procedures cannot be completed, it is rarely due to sedation-related AEs. NAAP sedation further allows adequate examination and successful treatment of high-risk lesions. NAAP sedation appears safe and effective for endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-04 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6461546/ /pubmed/30993168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Patel, Janaki
Fang, John
Taylor, Linda J.
Adler, Douglas G.
Gawron, Andrew J.
Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title_full Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title_short Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
title_sort safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284
work_keys_str_mv AT pateljanaki safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit
AT fangjohn safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit
AT taylorlindaj safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit
AT adlerdouglasg safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit
AT gawronandrewj safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit