Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit
Background and study aims Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284 |
_version_ | 1783410492851617792 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Janaki Fang, John Taylor, Linda J. Adler, Douglas G. Gawron, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Patel, Janaki Fang, John Taylor, Linda J. Adler, Douglas G. Gawron, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Patel, Janaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of NAAP sedation in an ICU population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) performed with NAAP sedation in our intensive care units from June 2014 to September 2016. All EGDs were performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point of this study was to analyze the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs). The secondary end points included successful completion of procedure and any endoscopic interventions performed. Results Two of 161 procedures (1.2 %) had sedation-related AEs requiring procedure termination. One hundred forty-six of 161 procedures (90.7 %) were successfully completed. Incomplete procedures were due to excess heme, retained food or obstructive lesions (13/161, 8.1 %). Endoscopic intervention was performed successfully in 17/24 cases (70.8 %) that had endoscopically treated lesions identified. One hundred six of 161 patients (66 %) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III or IV. Conclusion Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that EGDs can be successfully completed in ICU patients using NAAP sedation. When procedures cannot be completed, it is rarely due to sedation-related AEs. NAAP sedation further allows adequate examination and successful treatment of high-risk lesions. NAAP sedation appears safe and effective for endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6461546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64615462019-04-16 Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit Patel, Janaki Fang, John Taylor, Linda J. Adler, Douglas G. Gawron, Andrew J. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of NAAP sedation in an ICU population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) performed with NAAP sedation in our intensive care units from June 2014 to September 2016. All EGDs were performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point of this study was to analyze the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs). The secondary end points included successful completion of procedure and any endoscopic interventions performed. Results Two of 161 procedures (1.2 %) had sedation-related AEs requiring procedure termination. One hundred forty-six of 161 procedures (90.7 %) were successfully completed. Incomplete procedures were due to excess heme, retained food or obstructive lesions (13/161, 8.1 %). Endoscopic intervention was performed successfully in 17/24 cases (70.8 %) that had endoscopically treated lesions identified. One hundred six of 161 patients (66 %) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III or IV. Conclusion Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that EGDs can be successfully completed in ICU patients using NAAP sedation. When procedures cannot be completed, it is rarely due to sedation-related AEs. NAAP sedation further allows adequate examination and successful treatment of high-risk lesions. NAAP sedation appears safe and effective for endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-04 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6461546/ /pubmed/30993168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Patel, Janaki Fang, John Taylor, Linda J. Adler, Douglas G. Gawron, Andrew J. Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title | Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the intensive care unit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0829-6284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pateljanaki safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit AT fangjohn safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit AT taylorlindaj safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit AT adlerdouglasg safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit AT gawronandrewj safetyandefficacyofnonanesthesiologistadministrationofpropofolsedationduringesophagogastroduodenoscopyintheintensivecareunit |