Cargando…

Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord is a rare entity. It presents as a firm and painless intrascrotal mass. For diagnosis radiological methods such as ultrasound, CT or MRI are necessary. Radical orchiectomy is the gold standard of treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We reported a one case of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moussa, Mohamad, Abou Chakra, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30981071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.04.006
_version_ 1783410497506246656
author Moussa, Mohamad
Abou Chakra, Mohamed
author_facet Moussa, Mohamad
Abou Chakra, Mohamed
author_sort Moussa, Mohamad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord is a rare entity. It presents as a firm and painless intrascrotal mass. For diagnosis radiological methods such as ultrasound, CT or MRI are necessary. Radical orchiectomy is the gold standard of treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We reported a one case of a 66-year-old man that he has suffered from a painless hard mass in the right hemiscrotum since three years. Ultrasound revealed a paratesticular mass. Further workup revealed no distant metastasis before surgery. Right radical orchiectomy was performed, the final pathologic examination showed a leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord. The patient remained disease-free twelve-month during follow up after surgery. DISCUSSION: Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord is a rare condition, it arises from mesenchymal cells of the spermatic cord and occurs mainly in elderly patients. The diagnosis of spermatic cord leiomyosarcoma is difficult if based only on imaging procedures, it is revealed by histological examination post surgery. No treatment protocol has yet been established for paratesticular leiomyosarcoma due to the rarity of the disease. Standard treatment is radical orchidectomy with high ligation of the spermatic cord. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy are not well understood and may differ according to the surgeon's preferences. CONCLUSION: The lack of such cases results in the challenging nature of the diagnosis and treatment of leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord. Additional studies are needed to better define optimal management strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6461569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64615692019-04-22 Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review Moussa, Mohamad Abou Chakra, Mohamed Int J Surg Case Rep Article BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord is a rare entity. It presents as a firm and painless intrascrotal mass. For diagnosis radiological methods such as ultrasound, CT or MRI are necessary. Radical orchiectomy is the gold standard of treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We reported a one case of a 66-year-old man that he has suffered from a painless hard mass in the right hemiscrotum since three years. Ultrasound revealed a paratesticular mass. Further workup revealed no distant metastasis before surgery. Right radical orchiectomy was performed, the final pathologic examination showed a leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord. The patient remained disease-free twelve-month during follow up after surgery. DISCUSSION: Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord is a rare condition, it arises from mesenchymal cells of the spermatic cord and occurs mainly in elderly patients. The diagnosis of spermatic cord leiomyosarcoma is difficult if based only on imaging procedures, it is revealed by histological examination post surgery. No treatment protocol has yet been established for paratesticular leiomyosarcoma due to the rarity of the disease. Standard treatment is radical orchidectomy with high ligation of the spermatic cord. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy are not well understood and may differ according to the surgeon's preferences. CONCLUSION: The lack of such cases results in the challenging nature of the diagnosis and treatment of leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord. Additional studies are needed to better define optimal management strategies. Elsevier 2019-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6461569/ /pubmed/30981071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.04.006 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moussa, Mohamad
Abou Chakra, Mohamed
Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title_full Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title_fullStr Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title_short Leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and literature review
title_sort leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord: a case report and literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30981071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.04.006
work_keys_str_mv AT moussamohamad leiomyosarcomaofthespermaticcordacasereportandliteraturereview
AT abouchakramohamed leiomyosarcomaofthespermaticcordacasereportandliteraturereview