Cargando…

Research imperative

There is a note of caution expressed when clinical care providers enroll their own patients into investigational trials, a concern expressed in the called dual-role consent. There is concern that this circumstance may create a conflict of interest for the physician-investigator, lead to loss of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Trachtman, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100350
_version_ 1783410500802969600
author Trachtman, Howard
author_facet Trachtman, Howard
author_sort Trachtman, Howard
collection PubMed
description There is a note of caution expressed when clinical care providers enroll their own patients into investigational trials, a concern expressed in the called dual-role consent. There is concern that this circumstance may create a conflict of interest for the physician-investigator, lead to loss of patient voluntarism, and promote the therapeutic misconceptions. In this opinion paper, I review the circumstances surrounding participation in clinical research and the conduct of standard patient care. I propose that when a patient is eligible for an institutional review board-approved clinical trial, instead of representing a potential ethical lapse, soliciting enrollment by the clinician-researcher may represent optimal care for the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6461583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64615832019-04-22 Research imperative Trachtman, Howard Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article There is a note of caution expressed when clinical care providers enroll their own patients into investigational trials, a concern expressed in the called dual-role consent. There is concern that this circumstance may create a conflict of interest for the physician-investigator, lead to loss of patient voluntarism, and promote the therapeutic misconceptions. In this opinion paper, I review the circumstances surrounding participation in clinical research and the conduct of standard patient care. I propose that when a patient is eligible for an institutional review board-approved clinical trial, instead of representing a potential ethical lapse, soliciting enrollment by the clinician-researcher may represent optimal care for the patient. Elsevier 2019-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6461583/ /pubmed/31011655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100350 Text en © 2019 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trachtman, Howard
Research imperative
title Research imperative
title_full Research imperative
title_fullStr Research imperative
title_full_unstemmed Research imperative
title_short Research imperative
title_sort research imperative
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100350
work_keys_str_mv AT trachtmanhoward researchimperative