Cargando…

Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Sanne, Haastrup, Peter Fentz, Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran, Elnegaard, Sandra, Christensen, René dePont, Storsveen, Maria Munch, Søndergaard, Jens, Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x
_version_ 1783410553763397632
author Rasmussen, Sanne
Haastrup, Peter Fentz
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Elnegaard, Sandra
Christensen, René dePont
Storsveen, Maria Munch
Søndergaard, Jens
Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg
author_facet Rasmussen, Sanne
Haastrup, Peter Fentz
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Elnegaard, Sandra
Christensen, René dePont
Storsveen, Maria Munch
Søndergaard, Jens
Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg
author_sort Rasmussen, Sanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort of 69,060 individuals ≥40 years randomly selected from the Danish population was invited to complete a survey regarding symptoms and healthcare-seeking in 2012. Information on CRC diagnoses in a 12-month follow-up came from the Danish Cancer Registry. PVs and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 37,455 individuals participated (response rate 54.2%). Sixty-four individuals were diagnosed with CRC. The single symptom with the highest positive PVs (PPV) and LR+ was rectal bleeding. PPVs were generally higher among individuals aged ≥75 years and highest among those reporting at least one specific alarm symptom that led to a GP contact. CONCLUSION: In general, the PPVs of CRC alarm symptoms are low and the NPVs high, especially in the youngest age groups. The LR +  show a relative association with specific symptoms like rectal bleeding. Future campaigns on early diagnosis of CRC should focus on healthcare-seeking when experiencing rectal bleeding and target older people with the highest incidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6461905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64619052020-02-22 Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study Rasmussen, Sanne Haastrup, Peter Fentz Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Elnegaard, Sandra Christensen, René dePont Storsveen, Maria Munch Søndergaard, Jens Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort of 69,060 individuals ≥40 years randomly selected from the Danish population was invited to complete a survey regarding symptoms and healthcare-seeking in 2012. Information on CRC diagnoses in a 12-month follow-up came from the Danish Cancer Registry. PVs and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 37,455 individuals participated (response rate 54.2%). Sixty-four individuals were diagnosed with CRC. The single symptom with the highest positive PVs (PPV) and LR+ was rectal bleeding. PPVs were generally higher among individuals aged ≥75 years and highest among those reporting at least one specific alarm symptom that led to a GP contact. CONCLUSION: In general, the PPVs of CRC alarm symptoms are low and the NPVs high, especially in the youngest age groups. The LR +  show a relative association with specific symptoms like rectal bleeding. Future campaigns on early diagnosis of CRC should focus on healthcare-seeking when experiencing rectal bleeding and target older people with the highest incidence. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-22 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6461905/ /pubmed/30792531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x Text en © Cancer Research UK 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Rasmussen, Sanne
Haastrup, Peter Fentz
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Elnegaard, Sandra
Christensen, René dePont
Storsveen, Maria Munch
Søndergaard, Jens
Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg
Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title_full Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title_fullStr Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title_short Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
title_sort predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussensanne predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT haastruppeterfentz predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT balasubramaniamkirubakaran predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT elnegaardsandra predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT christensenrenedepont predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT storsveenmariamunch predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT søndergaardjens predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy
AT jarbøldorteejg predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy