Cargando…
Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x |
_version_ | 1783410553763397632 |
---|---|
author | Rasmussen, Sanne Haastrup, Peter Fentz Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Elnegaard, Sandra Christensen, René dePont Storsveen, Maria Munch Søndergaard, Jens Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg |
author_facet | Rasmussen, Sanne Haastrup, Peter Fentz Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Elnegaard, Sandra Christensen, René dePont Storsveen, Maria Munch Søndergaard, Jens Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg |
author_sort | Rasmussen, Sanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort of 69,060 individuals ≥40 years randomly selected from the Danish population was invited to complete a survey regarding symptoms and healthcare-seeking in 2012. Information on CRC diagnoses in a 12-month follow-up came from the Danish Cancer Registry. PVs and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 37,455 individuals participated (response rate 54.2%). Sixty-four individuals were diagnosed with CRC. The single symptom with the highest positive PVs (PPV) and LR+ was rectal bleeding. PPVs were generally higher among individuals aged ≥75 years and highest among those reporting at least one specific alarm symptom that led to a GP contact. CONCLUSION: In general, the PPVs of CRC alarm symptoms are low and the NPVs high, especially in the youngest age groups. The LR + show a relative association with specific symptoms like rectal bleeding. Future campaigns on early diagnosis of CRC should focus on healthcare-seeking when experiencing rectal bleeding and target older people with the highest incidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6461905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64619052020-02-22 Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study Rasmussen, Sanne Haastrup, Peter Fentz Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Elnegaard, Sandra Christensen, René dePont Storsveen, Maria Munch Søndergaard, Jens Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Alarm symptoms are used in many cancer referral guidelines. The objectives were to determine the 1-year predictive values (PVs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) alarm symptoms in the general population and to describe the proportion of alarm symptoms reported prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort of 69,060 individuals ≥40 years randomly selected from the Danish population was invited to complete a survey regarding symptoms and healthcare-seeking in 2012. Information on CRC diagnoses in a 12-month follow-up came from the Danish Cancer Registry. PVs and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 37,455 individuals participated (response rate 54.2%). Sixty-four individuals were diagnosed with CRC. The single symptom with the highest positive PVs (PPV) and LR+ was rectal bleeding. PPVs were generally higher among individuals aged ≥75 years and highest among those reporting at least one specific alarm symptom that led to a GP contact. CONCLUSION: In general, the PPVs of CRC alarm symptoms are low and the NPVs high, especially in the youngest age groups. The LR + show a relative association with specific symptoms like rectal bleeding. Future campaigns on early diagnosis of CRC should focus on healthcare-seeking when experiencing rectal bleeding and target older people with the highest incidence. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-22 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6461905/ /pubmed/30792531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x Text en © Cancer Research UK 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Rasmussen, Sanne Haastrup, Peter Fentz Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Elnegaard, Sandra Christensen, René dePont Storsveen, Maria Munch Søndergaard, Jens Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title | Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title_full | Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title_fullStr | Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title_short | Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
title_sort | predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6461905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmussensanne predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT haastruppeterfentz predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT balasubramaniamkirubakaran predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT elnegaardsandra predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT christensenrenedepont predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT storsveenmariamunch predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT søndergaardjens predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy AT jarbøldorteejg predictivevaluesofcolorectalcanceralarmsymptomsinthegeneralpopulationanationwidecohortstudy |