Cargando…
Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being
Gross domestic product (GDP) and derived metrics such as productivity have been central to our understanding of economic progress and well-being. In principle, changes in consumer surplus provide a superior, and more direct, measure of changes in well-being, especially for digital goods. In practice...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815663116 |
_version_ | 1783410571297685504 |
---|---|
author | Brynjolfsson, Erik Collis, Avinash Eggers, Felix |
author_facet | Brynjolfsson, Erik Collis, Avinash Eggers, Felix |
author_sort | Brynjolfsson, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gross domestic product (GDP) and derived metrics such as productivity have been central to our understanding of economic progress and well-being. In principle, changes in consumer surplus provide a superior, and more direct, measure of changes in well-being, especially for digital goods. In practice, these alternatives have been difficult to quantify. We explore the potential of massive online choice experiments to measure consumer surplus. We illustrate this technique via several empirical examples which quantify the valuations of popular digital goods and categories. Our examples include incentive-compatible discrete-choice experiments where online and laboratory participants receive monetary compensation if and only if they forgo goods for predefined periods. For example, the median user needed a compensation of about $48 to forgo Facebook for 1 mo. Our overall analyses reveal that digital goods have created large gains in well-being that are not reflected in conventional measures of GDP and productivity. By periodically querying a large, representative sample of goods and services, including those which are not priced in existing markets, changes in consumer surplus and other new measures of well-being derived from these online choice experiments have the potential for providing cost-effective supplements to the existing national income and product accounts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6462102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64621022019-04-16 Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being Brynjolfsson, Erik Collis, Avinash Eggers, Felix Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Gross domestic product (GDP) and derived metrics such as productivity have been central to our understanding of economic progress and well-being. In principle, changes in consumer surplus provide a superior, and more direct, measure of changes in well-being, especially for digital goods. In practice, these alternatives have been difficult to quantify. We explore the potential of massive online choice experiments to measure consumer surplus. We illustrate this technique via several empirical examples which quantify the valuations of popular digital goods and categories. Our examples include incentive-compatible discrete-choice experiments where online and laboratory participants receive monetary compensation if and only if they forgo goods for predefined periods. For example, the median user needed a compensation of about $48 to forgo Facebook for 1 mo. Our overall analyses reveal that digital goods have created large gains in well-being that are not reflected in conventional measures of GDP and productivity. By periodically querying a large, representative sample of goods and services, including those which are not priced in existing markets, changes in consumer surplus and other new measures of well-being derived from these online choice experiments have the potential for providing cost-effective supplements to the existing national income and product accounts. National Academy of Sciences 2019-04-09 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6462102/ /pubmed/30914458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815663116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Brynjolfsson, Erik Collis, Avinash Eggers, Felix Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title | Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title_full | Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title_fullStr | Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title_full_unstemmed | Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title_short | Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
title_sort | using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815663116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brynjolfssonerik usingmassiveonlinechoiceexperimentstomeasurechangesinwellbeing AT collisavinash usingmassiveonlinechoiceexperimentstomeasurechangesinwellbeing AT eggersfelix usingmassiveonlinechoiceexperimentstomeasurechangesinwellbeing |