Cargando…

Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation

PURPOSE: Operations managers are subjected to various cognitive biases, which may lead them to make less optimal decisions as suggested by the normative models. In their seminal work, Tversky and Kahneman introduced three heuristics based on which people make decisions: representativeness, availabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AlKhars, Mohammed, Evangelopoulos, Nicholas, Pavur, Robert, Kulkarni, Shailesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040729
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S193092
_version_ 1783410575037956096
author AlKhars, Mohammed
Evangelopoulos, Nicholas
Pavur, Robert
Kulkarni, Shailesh
author_facet AlKhars, Mohammed
Evangelopoulos, Nicholas
Pavur, Robert
Kulkarni, Shailesh
author_sort AlKhars, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Operations managers are subjected to various cognitive biases, which may lead them to make less optimal decisions as suggested by the normative models. In their seminal work, Tversky and Kahneman introduced three heuristics based on which people make decisions: representativeness, availability, and anchoring. This paper aims to investigate the six cognitive biases resulting from the use of the representativeness heuristic, namely, insensitivity to prior probability of outcomes, insensitivity to sample size, misconception of chance, insensitivity to predictability, the illusion of validity, and misconception of regression. Specifically, the paper examines how cognitive reflection and training affect these six cognitive biases in the operations management context. METHODS: For each cognitive bias, a scenario related to operations management was developed. The participants of the experimental study are asked to select among three responses, where one response is correct and the other two are biased. A total of 315 students from the University of North Texas participated in this study and 302 valid responses were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The results show that in all six scenarios, >50% of the respondents make biased decisions. However, using simple training, the bias is significantly reduced. Regarding the relationship between cognitive biases and cognitive reflection, the results partially support the hypothesis that people with high cognitive reflection ability tend to make less biased decisions. Regarding the effect of training on making biased decisions, the results show that making people aware of the existence of cognitive biases helps them partially to avoid making biased decisions. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study demonstrates the value of training in helping operations managers make less biased decisions. Our discussion section offers some related guidelines for creating a professional environment where the effect of the representativeness heuristic is minimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6462158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64621582019-04-30 Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation AlKhars, Mohammed Evangelopoulos, Nicholas Pavur, Robert Kulkarni, Shailesh Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Operations managers are subjected to various cognitive biases, which may lead them to make less optimal decisions as suggested by the normative models. In their seminal work, Tversky and Kahneman introduced three heuristics based on which people make decisions: representativeness, availability, and anchoring. This paper aims to investigate the six cognitive biases resulting from the use of the representativeness heuristic, namely, insensitivity to prior probability of outcomes, insensitivity to sample size, misconception of chance, insensitivity to predictability, the illusion of validity, and misconception of regression. Specifically, the paper examines how cognitive reflection and training affect these six cognitive biases in the operations management context. METHODS: For each cognitive bias, a scenario related to operations management was developed. The participants of the experimental study are asked to select among three responses, where one response is correct and the other two are biased. A total of 315 students from the University of North Texas participated in this study and 302 valid responses were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The results show that in all six scenarios, >50% of the respondents make biased decisions. However, using simple training, the bias is significantly reduced. Regarding the relationship between cognitive biases and cognitive reflection, the results partially support the hypothesis that people with high cognitive reflection ability tend to make less biased decisions. Regarding the effect of training on making biased decisions, the results show that making people aware of the existence of cognitive biases helps them partially to avoid making biased decisions. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study demonstrates the value of training in helping operations managers make less biased decisions. Our discussion section offers some related guidelines for creating a professional environment where the effect of the representativeness heuristic is minimized. Dove Medical Press 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6462158/ /pubmed/31040729 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S193092 Text en © 2019 AlKhars et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
AlKhars, Mohammed
Evangelopoulos, Nicholas
Pavur, Robert
Kulkarni, Shailesh
Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title_full Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title_fullStr Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title_short Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
title_sort cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040729
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S193092
work_keys_str_mv AT alkharsmohammed cognitivebiasesresultingfromtherepresentativenessheuristicinoperationsmanagementanexperimentalinvestigation
AT evangelopoulosnicholas cognitivebiasesresultingfromtherepresentativenessheuristicinoperationsmanagementanexperimentalinvestigation
AT pavurrobert cognitivebiasesresultingfromtherepresentativenessheuristicinoperationsmanagementanexperimentalinvestigation
AT kulkarnishailesh cognitivebiasesresultingfromtherepresentativenessheuristicinoperationsmanagementanexperimentalinvestigation