Cargando…

Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions

Epiphytic vascular plants comprise an essential part of the tropical flora and are a key component for ecosystem functioning. Some recent studies have used a network approach to investigate the interaction of epiphytes with host phorophytes at the community level. However, knowledge on commensalisti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naranjo, Carlos, Iriondo, José M, Riofrio, María L, Lara-Romero, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz011
_version_ 1783410585816268800
author Naranjo, Carlos
Iriondo, José M
Riofrio, María L
Lara-Romero, Carlos
author_facet Naranjo, Carlos
Iriondo, José M
Riofrio, María L
Lara-Romero, Carlos
author_sort Naranjo, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Epiphytic vascular plants comprise an essential part of the tropical flora and are a key component for ecosystem functioning. Some recent studies have used a network approach to investigate the interaction of epiphytes with host phorophytes at the community level. However, knowledge on commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte network structure still lags behind with regard to other biotic interaction networks. Our goal was to provide a more complete overall perspective on commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte interaction and its placement with respect to other better studied mutualistic interactions. We hypothesized that the intensity of the fitness effect of the different types of biotic interactions would determine the degree of specialization of the interacting organisms. Thus, commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte interactions would have lower specialization than mutualistic interactions. We compiled and analysed the structural properties (nestedness, network specialization and modularity) of 12 commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks and compared them with the same metrics to 11 ant–myrmecophyte, 86 pollination and 13 seed dispersal mutualistic networks. Epiphyte–phorophyte networks were nested and modular with regard to the corresponding null models and had greater nestedness than mutualistic networks, whereas specialization and modularity were significantly lower. Commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks of interactions are both nested and modular, and hence, are structured in a similar way to most other types of networks that involve co-evolutionary interactions. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the ecological processes involved in the generation of these patterns is likely to differ. The lower values of modularity in commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks are probably due to the low levels of specialization and the lack of co-evolutionary processes between the interacting partners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6462211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64622112019-04-17 Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions Naranjo, Carlos Iriondo, José M Riofrio, María L Lara-Romero, Carlos AoB Plants Studies Epiphytic vascular plants comprise an essential part of the tropical flora and are a key component for ecosystem functioning. Some recent studies have used a network approach to investigate the interaction of epiphytes with host phorophytes at the community level. However, knowledge on commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte network structure still lags behind with regard to other biotic interaction networks. Our goal was to provide a more complete overall perspective on commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte interaction and its placement with respect to other better studied mutualistic interactions. We hypothesized that the intensity of the fitness effect of the different types of biotic interactions would determine the degree of specialization of the interacting organisms. Thus, commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte interactions would have lower specialization than mutualistic interactions. We compiled and analysed the structural properties (nestedness, network specialization and modularity) of 12 commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks and compared them with the same metrics to 11 ant–myrmecophyte, 86 pollination and 13 seed dispersal mutualistic networks. Epiphyte–phorophyte networks were nested and modular with regard to the corresponding null models and had greater nestedness than mutualistic networks, whereas specialization and modularity were significantly lower. Commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks of interactions are both nested and modular, and hence, are structured in a similar way to most other types of networks that involve co-evolutionary interactions. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the ecological processes involved in the generation of these patterns is likely to differ. The lower values of modularity in commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks are probably due to the low levels of specialization and the lack of co-evolutionary processes between the interacting partners. Oxford University Press 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6462211/ /pubmed/30996861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz011 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Studies
Naranjo, Carlos
Iriondo, José M
Riofrio, María L
Lara-Romero, Carlos
Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title_full Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title_fullStr Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title_short Evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
title_sort evaluating the structure of commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte networks: a comparative perspective of biotic interactions
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz011
work_keys_str_mv AT naranjocarlos evaluatingthestructureofcommensalisticepiphytephorophytenetworksacomparativeperspectiveofbioticinteractions
AT iriondojosem evaluatingthestructureofcommensalisticepiphytephorophytenetworksacomparativeperspectiveofbioticinteractions
AT riofriomarial evaluatingthestructureofcommensalisticepiphytephorophytenetworksacomparativeperspectiveofbioticinteractions
AT lararomerocarlos evaluatingthestructureofcommensalisticepiphytephorophytenetworksacomparativeperspectiveofbioticinteractions